Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/8045 |
Resumo: | Fish and other seafood are important sources of nutrients, but they are also sources of chemical contaminants that may cause adverse health effects. This article aimed to identify existing risk–benefit assessments (RBA) of fish, shellfish, and other seafood, compare methodologies, discuss differences and commonalities in findings, and identify limitations and ways forward for future studies. We conducted a scoping review of the scientific literature of studies in all languages published from 2000 through April 2019. We identified 106 RBA of fish and other seafood across Europe, Asia, North America, Africa, and at the global level. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of types of fish and other seafood considered, beneficial and adverse compounds assessed, and overall methodology. Collected data showed that a diet consisting of a variety of lean and fatty fish and other seafood is recommended for the overall population and that women of childbearing age and children should limit the consumption of fish and other seafood types that have a high likelihood of contamination. Our review emphasizes the need for evidence-based, up-to-date, and harmonized approaches in RBA in general. |
id |
RCAP_cdb3fe6c9ce2180bd0a9770810c12fa8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/8045 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping reviewHealth EffectsAdverseBeneficialNutrientsContaminantsFishSeafoodImpact AssessmentSegurança AlimentarComposição dos AlimentosToxicologia dos AlimentosAvaliação do RiscoFish and other seafood are important sources of nutrients, but they are also sources of chemical contaminants that may cause adverse health effects. This article aimed to identify existing risk–benefit assessments (RBA) of fish, shellfish, and other seafood, compare methodologies, discuss differences and commonalities in findings, and identify limitations and ways forward for future studies. We conducted a scoping review of the scientific literature of studies in all languages published from 2000 through April 2019. We identified 106 RBA of fish and other seafood across Europe, Asia, North America, Africa, and at the global level. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of types of fish and other seafood considered, beneficial and adverse compounds assessed, and overall methodology. Collected data showed that a diet consisting of a variety of lean and fatty fish and other seafood is recommended for the overall population and that women of childbearing age and children should limit the consumption of fish and other seafood types that have a high likelihood of contamination. Our review emphasizes the need for evidence-based, up-to-date, and harmonized approaches in RBA in general.Sofie T. Thomsen and Sara M. Pires were partly funded by the Danish Ministry of Environment and Food through the Metrix project. Alberto Garre was supported by a postdoctoral granted from the Fundaci on Seneca (20900/PD/18) and by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska- Curie Individual Fellowship grant no. 844423 (FANTASTICAL). Ricardo Assuncão thanks to FCT/MCTES for the financial support to CESAM (UIDP/50017/2020þUIDB/50017/2020), through national funds.Taylor and FrancisRepositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de SaúdeThomsen, S.T.Assunção, RicardoAfonso, C.Boué, G.Cardoso, C.Cubadda, F.Garre, A.Kruisselbrink, J.Mantovani, A.Pitter, J.Poulsen, M.Verhagen, H.Ververis, E.van der Voet, H.Watzl, B.Pires, S.2022-07-03T15:07:28Z2021-05-062021-05-06T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/8045engCrit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021 May 6;1-22. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1915240. Online ahead of print.1040-839810.1080/10408398.2021.1915240info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-20T15:42:24Zoai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/8045Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:42:47.960013Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review |
title |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review |
spellingShingle |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review Thomsen, S.T. Health Effects Adverse Beneficial Nutrients Contaminants Fish Seafood Impact Assessment Segurança Alimentar Composição dos Alimentos Toxicologia dos Alimentos Avaliação do Risco |
title_short |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review |
title_full |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review |
title_fullStr |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review |
title_sort |
Human health risk–benefit assessment of fish and other seafood: a scoping review |
author |
Thomsen, S.T. |
author_facet |
Thomsen, S.T. Assunção, Ricardo Afonso, C. Boué, G. Cardoso, C. Cubadda, F. Garre, A. Kruisselbrink, J. Mantovani, A. Pitter, J. Poulsen, M. Verhagen, H. Ververis, E. van der Voet, H. Watzl, B. Pires, S. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Assunção, Ricardo Afonso, C. Boué, G. Cardoso, C. Cubadda, F. Garre, A. Kruisselbrink, J. Mantovani, A. Pitter, J. Poulsen, M. Verhagen, H. Ververis, E. van der Voet, H. Watzl, B. Pires, S. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de Saúde |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Thomsen, S.T. Assunção, Ricardo Afonso, C. Boué, G. Cardoso, C. Cubadda, F. Garre, A. Kruisselbrink, J. Mantovani, A. Pitter, J. Poulsen, M. Verhagen, H. Ververis, E. van der Voet, H. Watzl, B. Pires, S. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Effects Adverse Beneficial Nutrients Contaminants Fish Seafood Impact Assessment Segurança Alimentar Composição dos Alimentos Toxicologia dos Alimentos Avaliação do Risco |
topic |
Health Effects Adverse Beneficial Nutrients Contaminants Fish Seafood Impact Assessment Segurança Alimentar Composição dos Alimentos Toxicologia dos Alimentos Avaliação do Risco |
description |
Fish and other seafood are important sources of nutrients, but they are also sources of chemical contaminants that may cause adverse health effects. This article aimed to identify existing risk–benefit assessments (RBA) of fish, shellfish, and other seafood, compare methodologies, discuss differences and commonalities in findings, and identify limitations and ways forward for future studies. We conducted a scoping review of the scientific literature of studies in all languages published from 2000 through April 2019. We identified 106 RBA of fish and other seafood across Europe, Asia, North America, Africa, and at the global level. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of types of fish and other seafood considered, beneficial and adverse compounds assessed, and overall methodology. Collected data showed that a diet consisting of a variety of lean and fatty fish and other seafood is recommended for the overall population and that women of childbearing age and children should limit the consumption of fish and other seafood types that have a high likelihood of contamination. Our review emphasizes the need for evidence-based, up-to-date, and harmonized approaches in RBA in general. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-06 2021-05-06T00:00:00Z 2022-07-03T15:07:28Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/8045 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/8045 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021 May 6;1-22. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1915240. Online ahead of print. 1040-8398 10.1080/10408398.2021.1915240 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
embargoedAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor and Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132173692829696 |