Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Blount, Kelly
Data de Publicação: 2020
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.9548
Resumo: In many ways, policing is a noteworthy feature of the field of criminal law. Its diverse mandate includes ensuring public order, and preventing and investigating crime. Though these roles have been traditionally managed as distinct functions, as prevention subsumes the others they are becoming more closely aligned in practice. This contribution will assess the role that AI has played in strengthening the mandate for crime prevention. It will argue that AI has been a critical tool in advancing crime prevention, but its use has outpaced legal processes and individuals may face violations of their legal interests in a legal framework ill-equipped for countering robust crime prevention measures. The article will ultimately advocate the expanding and strengthening of the legal protections afforded to criminal suspects in preventative investigations, while also addressing the way in which AI alters the enforcement of legal standards.
id RCAP_ce1459624275ce12240b2a9a00e2c153
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/9548
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?In many ways, policing is a noteworthy feature of the field of criminal law. Its diverse mandate includes ensuring public order, and preventing and investigating crime. Though these roles have been traditionally managed as distinct functions, as prevention subsumes the others they are becoming more closely aligned in practice. This contribution will assess the role that AI has played in strengthening the mandate for crime prevention. It will argue that AI has been a critical tool in advancing crime prevention, but its use has outpaced legal processes and individuals may face violations of their legal interests in a legal framework ill-equipped for countering robust crime prevention measures. The article will ultimately advocate the expanding and strengthening of the legal protections afforded to criminal suspects in preventative investigations, while also addressing the way in which AI alters the enforcement of legal standards.O policiamento é, de muitas formas, uma dimensão relevante no âmbito do Direito Criminal. Os seus diversos mandatos incluem manter a ordem pública, prevenir e investigar crimes. Apesar destes papéis terem sido tradicionalmente tratados enquanto funções diferentes, como a prevenção inclui os outros, têm-se tornado, na prática, mais estreitamente alinhados. Este contributo irá servir para avaliar o papel que a AI (inteligência artificial) tem desempenhado no reforço do mandato para a prevenção do crime. Pode-se argumentar que a AI tem sido um instrumento crítico para o desenvolvimento da prevenção criminal, mas o seu uso ultrapassou os processos legais e os indivíduos podem enfrentar as violações dos seus interesses num quadro legal mal equipado para combater medidas robustas de prevenção criminal. Por fim, o artigo irá defender a expansão e reforço da proteção legal concedida aos suspeitos nas investigações preventivas, enquanto aborda também o modo como AI altera a aplicação dos padrões legais.Universidade Católica Portuguesa2020-11-20info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.9548https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.9548Católica Law Review; Vol 4 No 3 (2020): Criminal law; 51-82Católica Law Review; v. 4 n. 3 (2020): Direito penal; 51-822184-03342183-933610.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.4.3reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9548https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9548/9459Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Kelly Blounthttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBlount, Kelly2023-10-03T15:41:20Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/9548Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:32:49.029424Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?
title Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?
spellingShingle Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?
Blount, Kelly
title_short Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?
title_full Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?
title_fullStr Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?
title_full_unstemmed Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?
title_sort Forfeiting legal protections to prevent crime?
author Blount, Kelly
author_facet Blount, Kelly
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Blount, Kelly
description In many ways, policing is a noteworthy feature of the field of criminal law. Its diverse mandate includes ensuring public order, and preventing and investigating crime. Though these roles have been traditionally managed as distinct functions, as prevention subsumes the others they are becoming more closely aligned in practice. This contribution will assess the role that AI has played in strengthening the mandate for crime prevention. It will argue that AI has been a critical tool in advancing crime prevention, but its use has outpaced legal processes and individuals may face violations of their legal interests in a legal framework ill-equipped for countering robust crime prevention measures. The article will ultimately advocate the expanding and strengthening of the legal protections afforded to criminal suspects in preventative investigations, while also addressing the way in which AI alters the enforcement of legal standards.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-20
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.9548
https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.9548
url https://doi.org/10.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.9548
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9548
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/catolicalawreview/article/view/9548/9459
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Kelly Blount
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2020 Kelly Blount
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Católica Law Review; Vol 4 No 3 (2020): Criminal law; 51-82
Católica Law Review; v. 4 n. 3 (2020): Direito penal; 51-82
2184-0334
2183-9336
10.34632/catolicalawreview.2020.4.3
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133594160988160

Registros relacionados