Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Manassero-Mas, María Antonia
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i4.21808
Resumo: Scientific thinking arises in science education mainly from the contributions of the science-technology- society-environment approach to science education, which aims to promote epistemic knowledge about scientific practice. On the other hand, critical thinking arises within the framework of philosophy, but cognitive psychology contributes to its main development in recent decades. In previous works, both concepts have been developed and specified along two taxonomies that help to categorize and clarify them; scientific thinking develops along a decalogue of aspects and skills, and critical thinking develops four dimensions: creativity, reasoning, complex processes (problem solving and decision-making) and evaluation. This communication elaborates both concepts, from the careful comparison of their specific contents, to demonstrate their deep similarity and the mutual relationships that connect them, despite they had been generated in different research traditions and expressing themselves with different technical formalisms and languages. As a consequence of the similarity, the understanding of both concepts and their development as transversal learning competencies are deepened and clarified, in order to improve their implementation in research and in general and science education by teachers. As a conclusion of the mutual similarity and the transversal nature of both concepts, it is claimed that critical thinking contributes to improve scientific education and vice versa, the development of scientific thinking also contributes to critical thinking skills, and both improve learning from a competency perspective.
id RCAP_d07e5da19a81e738adaa0eef01f2eb9c
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/21808
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learningPensamiento científico y pensamiento crítico: competencias transversales para aprenderScientific thinking arises in science education mainly from the contributions of the science-technology- society-environment approach to science education, which aims to promote epistemic knowledge about scientific practice. On the other hand, critical thinking arises within the framework of philosophy, but cognitive psychology contributes to its main development in recent decades. In previous works, both concepts have been developed and specified along two taxonomies that help to categorize and clarify them; scientific thinking develops along a decalogue of aspects and skills, and critical thinking develops four dimensions: creativity, reasoning, complex processes (problem solving and decision-making) and evaluation. This communication elaborates both concepts, from the careful comparison of their specific contents, to demonstrate their deep similarity and the mutual relationships that connect them, despite they had been generated in different research traditions and expressing themselves with different technical formalisms and languages. As a consequence of the similarity, the understanding of both concepts and their development as transversal learning competencies are deepened and clarified, in order to improve their implementation in research and in general and science education by teachers. As a conclusion of the mutual similarity and the transversal nature of both concepts, it is claimed that critical thinking contributes to improve scientific education and vice versa, the development of scientific thinking also contributes to critical thinking skills, and both improve learning from a competency perspective.El pensamiento científico surge en la educación científica principalmente a partir de las contribuciones del enfoque ciencia-tecnología-sociedad-ambiente en la educación científica, que trata de promover el conocimiento epistémico acerca de la práctica científica. Por otro lado, el pensamiento crítico surge en el marco de la filosofía, pero en las últimas décadas la psicología cognitiva contribuye a su desarrollo principal. En trabajos previos, ambos conceptos se han desarrollado y concretado en sendas taxonomías que contribuyen a categorizarlos y clarificarlos; el pensamiento científico se desarrolla en un decálogo de aspectos y destrezas, y el pensamiento crítico desarrolla cuatro dimensiones: creatividad, razonamiento, procesos complejos (resolución de problemas y toma de decisiones) y evaluación. Este artículo elabora ambos conceptos, a partir de la comparación de los contenidos de cada uno de ellos, para demostrar su profunda semejanza y las relaciones mutuas que los unen, a pesar de haber sido generados en tradiciones de investigación diferentes y expresarse con formalismos y lenguajes técnicos distintos. Como consecuencia de esta semejanza, se profundiza y clarifica la comprensión de ambos conceptos y su desarrollo como competencias transversales del aprendizaje, con el fin de mejorar su implementación en la investigación y en la educación general y científica por los docentes. Como conclusión de la semejanza mutua y el carácter transversal de ambos se sostiene que el pensamiento crítico contribuye a mejorar la educación científica y viceversa, el desarrollo del pensamiento científico contribuye también a las destrezas de pensamiento crítico, y ambos mejoran los aprendizajes desde una perspectiva competencial.O pensamento científico surge na educação científica principalmente a partir das contribuições da abordagem ciência-tecnologia-sociedade-ambiente à educação científica, que tenta promover o conhecimento epistêmico sobre a prática científica. Por outro lado, o pensamento crítico surge dentro da estrutura da filosofia, mas nas últimas décadas a psicologia cognitiva contribui para o seu desenvolvimento principal. Em trabalhos anteriores, ambos os conceitos foram desenvolvidos e especificados em duas taxonomias que ajudam a categorizá-los e esclarecê-los; O pensamento científico se desenvolve em um decálogo de aspectos e habilidades, e o pensamento crítico desenvolve quatro dimensões: criatividade, raciocínio, procesos complexos (resolução de problemas e tomada de decisão) e avaliação. Este artigo elabora os dois conceitos, a partir da comparação do conteúdo de cada um deles, para demonstrar sua profunda semelhança e as relações mútuas que os unem, apesar de terem sido gerados em diferentes tradições de pesquisa e se expressarem com formalismos e linguagens. técnicos diferentes. Como conseqüência dessa semelhança, o entendimento de conceitos e seu desenvolvimento como competências transversais de aprendizagem são aprofundados e esclarecidos, a fim de melhorar sua implementação na pesquisa e no ensino geral e científico dos professores. Em conclusão da semelhança mútua e da natureza transversal de ambos, argumenta-se que o pensamento crítico contribui para melhorar a educação científica e vice- -versa, o desenvolvimento do pensamento científico também contribui para as habilidades de pensamento crítico, e ambos melhoram a aprendizagem de uma perspectiva de competência.Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro2020-11-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i4.21808https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i4.21808Indagatio Didactica; Vol 12 No 4 (2020); 401-420Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 Núm. 4 (2020); 401-420Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 No 4 (2020); 401-420Indagatio Didactica; vol. 12 n.º 4 (2020); 401-4201647-3582reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPspahttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/21808https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/21808/15961Manassero-Mas, María AntoniaVázquez-Alonso, Ángelinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-22T10:19:01Zoai:proa.ua.pt:article/21808Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:30:27.473854Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning
Pensamiento científico y pensamiento crítico: competencias transversales para aprender
title Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning
spellingShingle Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning
Manassero-Mas, María Antonia
title_short Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning
title_full Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning
title_fullStr Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning
title_full_unstemmed Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning
title_sort Scientific thinking and critical thinking: transversal competences for learning
author Manassero-Mas, María Antonia
author_facet Manassero-Mas, María Antonia
Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
author_role author
author2 Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Manassero-Mas, María Antonia
Vázquez-Alonso, Ángel
description Scientific thinking arises in science education mainly from the contributions of the science-technology- society-environment approach to science education, which aims to promote epistemic knowledge about scientific practice. On the other hand, critical thinking arises within the framework of philosophy, but cognitive psychology contributes to its main development in recent decades. In previous works, both concepts have been developed and specified along two taxonomies that help to categorize and clarify them; scientific thinking develops along a decalogue of aspects and skills, and critical thinking develops four dimensions: creativity, reasoning, complex processes (problem solving and decision-making) and evaluation. This communication elaborates both concepts, from the careful comparison of their specific contents, to demonstrate their deep similarity and the mutual relationships that connect them, despite they had been generated in different research traditions and expressing themselves with different technical formalisms and languages. As a consequence of the similarity, the understanding of both concepts and their development as transversal learning competencies are deepened and clarified, in order to improve their implementation in research and in general and science education by teachers. As a conclusion of the mutual similarity and the transversal nature of both concepts, it is claimed that critical thinking contributes to improve scientific education and vice versa, the development of scientific thinking also contributes to critical thinking skills, and both improve learning from a competency perspective.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i4.21808
https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i4.21808
url https://doi.org/10.34624/id.v12i4.21808
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/21808
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/id/article/view/21808/15961
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Centro de Investigação Didática e Tecnologia na Formação de Formadores (CIDTFF) / Universidade de Aveiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Indagatio Didactica; Vol 12 No 4 (2020); 401-420
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 Núm. 4 (2020); 401-420
Indagatio Didactica; Vol. 12 No 4 (2020); 401-420
Indagatio Didactica; vol. 12 n.º 4 (2020); 401-420
1647-3582
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133572949344256