Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fernandes, Diogo de Almeida
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Cadete, Rúben, António, Natália, Ventura, Miguel, Cristóvão, João, Elvas, Luís, Gonçalves, Lino
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103333
https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12658
Resumo: Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decrease in patients' follow-up and interventions with cardiovascular disease. In Portugal, the consequences on emergent pacemaker implantation rates are largely unknown. We sought to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergent pacemaker implantation rate and patient profile. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical profile of the 180 patients who had pacemakers implanted in our hospital in an emergent setting from March 18, 2020, to May 17, 2020 (“lockdown”) and May 19 to July 17, 2020 (“postlockdown”). This data was then directly compared to the homologous periods from the year before. Results: Urgent pacemaker implantation rates during "lockdown" was lower than its homologous period (−23.7%), and cases in "postlockdown" were significantly increased (+106.9% vs. "lockdown"; +13.2% vs. May–July 2019). When comparing “lockdown” and “postlockdown,” there was a tendency for a higher number of temporary pacemaker use (p = .076). Patients during “lockdown” were 7.57 times more likely to present with hypotension/shock (odds ratio 7.57; p = .013). We also noted a higher tendency for hypotension on presentation during “lockdown” (p = .054) in comparison to 2019. In comparison to its homologous 2019 period, “postlockdown” saw more patients presenting with bradycardia (p = .026). N o p atients were admitted to the emergency department during "lockdown" for anomalies detected on ambulatory tests. Conclusion: Our data show that the COVID-19 pandemic had a real impact on urgent pacemaker implantation. Patients with bradyarrhythmias are at particular risk for severe complications and should seek medical care regardless of the pandemic.
id RCAP_d0bdda7706b5946fc53313536e41c8cd
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103333
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional studyatrioventricular blockbradycardiaCOVID-19emergencypacemakerAims: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decrease in patients' follow-up and interventions with cardiovascular disease. In Portugal, the consequences on emergent pacemaker implantation rates are largely unknown. We sought to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergent pacemaker implantation rate and patient profile. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical profile of the 180 patients who had pacemakers implanted in our hospital in an emergent setting from March 18, 2020, to May 17, 2020 (“lockdown”) and May 19 to July 17, 2020 (“postlockdown”). This data was then directly compared to the homologous periods from the year before. Results: Urgent pacemaker implantation rates during "lockdown" was lower than its homologous period (−23.7%), and cases in "postlockdown" were significantly increased (+106.9% vs. "lockdown"; +13.2% vs. May–July 2019). When comparing “lockdown” and “postlockdown,” there was a tendency for a higher number of temporary pacemaker use (p = .076). Patients during “lockdown” were 7.57 times more likely to present with hypotension/shock (odds ratio 7.57; p = .013). We also noted a higher tendency for hypotension on presentation during “lockdown” (p = .054) in comparison to 2019. In comparison to its homologous 2019 period, “postlockdown” saw more patients presenting with bradycardia (p = .026). N o p atients were admitted to the emergency department during "lockdown" for anomalies detected on ambulatory tests. Conclusion: Our data show that the COVID-19 pandemic had a real impact on urgent pacemaker implantation. Patients with bradyarrhythmias are at particular risk for severe complications and should seek medical care regardless of the pandemic.2022-02info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/103333http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103333https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12658eng1880-4276Fernandes, Diogo de AlmeidaCadete, RúbenAntónio, NatáliaVentura, MiguelCristóvão, JoãoElvas, LuísGonçalves, Linoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-11-07T21:33:17Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/103333Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:20:11.368580Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study
title Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study
Fernandes, Diogo de Almeida
atrioventricular block
bradycardia
COVID-19
emergency
pacemaker
title_short Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study
title_full Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study
title_sort Impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in urgent pacemaker implantations: A cross-sectional study
author Fernandes, Diogo de Almeida
author_facet Fernandes, Diogo de Almeida
Cadete, Rúben
António, Natália
Ventura, Miguel
Cristóvão, João
Elvas, Luís
Gonçalves, Lino
author_role author
author2 Cadete, Rúben
António, Natália
Ventura, Miguel
Cristóvão, João
Elvas, Luís
Gonçalves, Lino
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fernandes, Diogo de Almeida
Cadete, Rúben
António, Natália
Ventura, Miguel
Cristóvão, João
Elvas, Luís
Gonçalves, Lino
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv atrioventricular block
bradycardia
COVID-19
emergency
pacemaker
topic atrioventricular block
bradycardia
COVID-19
emergency
pacemaker
description Aims: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a decrease in patients' follow-up and interventions with cardiovascular disease. In Portugal, the consequences on emergent pacemaker implantation rates are largely unknown. We sought to analyze the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergent pacemaker implantation rate and patient profile. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical profile of the 180 patients who had pacemakers implanted in our hospital in an emergent setting from March 18, 2020, to May 17, 2020 (“lockdown”) and May 19 to July 17, 2020 (“postlockdown”). This data was then directly compared to the homologous periods from the year before. Results: Urgent pacemaker implantation rates during "lockdown" was lower than its homologous period (−23.7%), and cases in "postlockdown" were significantly increased (+106.9% vs. "lockdown"; +13.2% vs. May–July 2019). When comparing “lockdown” and “postlockdown,” there was a tendency for a higher number of temporary pacemaker use (p = .076). Patients during “lockdown” were 7.57 times more likely to present with hypotension/shock (odds ratio 7.57; p = .013). We also noted a higher tendency for hypotension on presentation during “lockdown” (p = .054) in comparison to 2019. In comparison to its homologous 2019 period, “postlockdown” saw more patients presenting with bradycardia (p = .026). N o p atients were admitted to the emergency department during "lockdown" for anomalies detected on ambulatory tests. Conclusion: Our data show that the COVID-19 pandemic had a real impact on urgent pacemaker implantation. Patients with bradyarrhythmias are at particular risk for severe complications and should seek medical care regardless of the pandemic.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103333
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103333
https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12658
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/103333
https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12658
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1880-4276
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134095134949376