Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dinis, Sofia Raposo
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Domingues, Ana Patrícia, Belo, Adriana, Couto, Daniela, Fonseca, Etelvina, Moura, Paulo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109304
https://doi.org/10.1590/SO100-720320150005272
Resumo: PURPOSE: To compare obstetric outcomes of induced preterm twin births (under 32 weeks gestation) with those spontaneously conceived. METHODS: Prospective study of twin pregnancies (25 induced and 157 spontaneously conceived) developed over a period of 16 years in a tertiary obstetric center. Demographic factors, obstetric complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight and immediate newborn outcome were compared. RESULTS: The analysis of obstetrical complications concerning urinary or other infections, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, fetal malformations, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine discordant growth reveal no significant statistical differences between the two groups. First trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (24 versus 8.3%, p=0.029). The cesarean delivery rate was 52.2% in spontaneous gestations and 64% in induced gestations. Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores at first and fifth minutes, admissions to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and puerperal complications show no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were independent of chorionicity and induction method. CONCLUSION: The mode of conception did not influence obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Although induced pregnancies have higher risk of first trimester bleeding, significant differences were not observed regarding other obstetric and puerperal complications and neonatal results.
id RCAP_d2ca5cfd0bec1d32e43313a27ba4b582
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/109304
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestationGestações gemelares induzidas modificam o resultado obstétrico e perinatal de partos antes da 32ª semana? Comparação com gestações espontâneasTwinsInduced reproductionPregnancy outcomeGêmeosReprodução assistidaResultado da gravidezFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornMultiple Birth OffspringPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy Trimester, ThirdPregnancy, TwinProspective StudiesPregnancy OutcomeReproductive Techniques, AssistedPURPOSE: To compare obstetric outcomes of induced preterm twin births (under 32 weeks gestation) with those spontaneously conceived. METHODS: Prospective study of twin pregnancies (25 induced and 157 spontaneously conceived) developed over a period of 16 years in a tertiary obstetric center. Demographic factors, obstetric complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight and immediate newborn outcome were compared. RESULTS: The analysis of obstetrical complications concerning urinary or other infections, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, fetal malformations, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine discordant growth reveal no significant statistical differences between the two groups. First trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (24 versus 8.3%, p=0.029). The cesarean delivery rate was 52.2% in spontaneous gestations and 64% in induced gestations. Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores at first and fifth minutes, admissions to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and puerperal complications show no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were independent of chorionicity and induction method. CONCLUSION: The mode of conception did not influence obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Although induced pregnancies have higher risk of first trimester bleeding, significant differences were not observed regarding other obstetric and puerperal complications and neonatal results.OBJETIVO: Comparar os resultados obstétricos de gestações gemelares induzidas com as concebidas espontaneamente, em partos ocorridos antes da 32ª semana de idade gestacional. MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo de gestações gemelares (25 induzidas e 157 concebidas espontaneamente) desenvolvido durante um período de 16 anos num centro terciário de Obstetrícia. Foram comparados fatores demográficos, complicações obstétricas, idade gestacional no parto, tipo de parto, peso ao nascer e o outcome imediato do recém-nascido. RESULTADOS: A análise das seguintes complicações obstétricas: infecções urinárias ou outras, distúrbios hipertensivos da gravidez, diabetes gestacional, malformações fetais, morte fetal intrauterina, restrição de crescimento intrauterino e crescimento intrauterino discordante não revelou diferenças estatísticas significativas entre os dois grupos. No grupo das gestações induzidas, observou-se maior taxa de metrorragias do 1º trimestre (24 versus 8,3%, p=0,029). A taxa de cesariana foi de 52,2% nas gestações espontâneas e 64% nas gestações induzidas. Idade gestacional no parto, peso ao nascer, índice de Apgar no primeiro e quinto minutos, internamento em unidade de cuidados intensivos neonatal e complicações puerperais não apresentam diferenças estatisticamente significantes entre os dois grupos. Esses resultados foram independentes do tipo de placentação e método de indução. CONCLUSÃO: O modo de concepção não influenciou os resultados obstétricos e neonatais. Embora as gestações induzidas tenham maior risco de metrorragias do primeiro trimestre, não foram observadas diferenças significativas em relação a outras complicações obstétricas, complicações puerperais e em relação aos resultados neonatais.Thieme2015-05info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/109304http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109304https://doi.org/10.1590/SO100-720320150005272eng1806-9339Dinis, Sofia RaposoDomingues, Ana PatríciaBelo, AdrianaCouto, DanielaFonseca, EtelvinaMoura, Pauloinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-10-09T11:32:00Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/109304Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:25:30.719918Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
Gestações gemelares induzidas modificam o resultado obstétrico e perinatal de partos antes da 32ª semana? Comparação com gestações espontâneas
title Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
spellingShingle Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
Dinis, Sofia Raposo
Twins
Induced reproduction
Pregnancy outcome
Gêmeos
Reprodução assistida
Resultado da gravidez
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Multiple Birth Offspring
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Pregnancy, Twin
Prospective Studies
Pregnancy Outcome
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
title_short Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_full Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_fullStr Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_full_unstemmed Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
title_sort Do induced twin pregnancies influence the obstetric and neonatal results of multiple births born before 32 weeks? Comparison to spontaneous gestation
author Dinis, Sofia Raposo
author_facet Dinis, Sofia Raposo
Domingues, Ana Patrícia
Belo, Adriana
Couto, Daniela
Fonseca, Etelvina
Moura, Paulo
author_role author
author2 Domingues, Ana Patrícia
Belo, Adriana
Couto, Daniela
Fonseca, Etelvina
Moura, Paulo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dinis, Sofia Raposo
Domingues, Ana Patrícia
Belo, Adriana
Couto, Daniela
Fonseca, Etelvina
Moura, Paulo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Twins
Induced reproduction
Pregnancy outcome
Gêmeos
Reprodução assistida
Resultado da gravidez
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Multiple Birth Offspring
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Pregnancy, Twin
Prospective Studies
Pregnancy Outcome
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
topic Twins
Induced reproduction
Pregnancy outcome
Gêmeos
Reprodução assistida
Resultado da gravidez
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Multiple Birth Offspring
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications
Pregnancy Trimester, Third
Pregnancy, Twin
Prospective Studies
Pregnancy Outcome
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
description PURPOSE: To compare obstetric outcomes of induced preterm twin births (under 32 weeks gestation) with those spontaneously conceived. METHODS: Prospective study of twin pregnancies (25 induced and 157 spontaneously conceived) developed over a period of 16 years in a tertiary obstetric center. Demographic factors, obstetric complications, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, birth weight and immediate newborn outcome were compared. RESULTS: The analysis of obstetrical complications concerning urinary or other infections, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, gestational diabetes, fetal malformations, intrauterine fetal death, intrauterine growth restriction and intrauterine discordant growth reveal no significant statistical differences between the two groups. First trimester bleeding was higher in the induced group (24 versus 8.3%, p=0.029). The cesarean delivery rate was 52.2% in spontaneous gestations and 64% in induced gestations. Gestational age at delivery, birth weight, Apgar scores at first and fifth minutes, admissions to Neonatal Intensive Care Unit and puerperal complications show no statistically significant differences between the two groups. These results were independent of chorionicity and induction method. CONCLUSION: The mode of conception did not influence obstetric and neonatal outcomes. Although induced pregnancies have higher risk of first trimester bleeding, significant differences were not observed regarding other obstetric and puerperal complications and neonatal results.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109304
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109304
https://doi.org/10.1590/SO100-720320150005272
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/109304
https://doi.org/10.1590/SO100-720320150005272
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1806-9339
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Thieme
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Thieme
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134137514196992