Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Peffenköver, Marie
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Adriaensen, Johan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4014
Resumo: Since the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament wields the power of consent over international (trade) agreements, enabling it to threaten a veto. Due to the extensive financial and reputational costs associated with a veto, the European Commission (hereinafter Commission) was expected to read these threats effectively. However, the Commission’s responses to such threats have varied greatly. Building on a fine-grained causal mechanism derived from information processing theory and an extensive process-tracing analysis of seven free trade agreements post-Lisbon, we explain why the Commission has responded differently to looming vetoes. Our analysis reveals that the variation in Commission responses derives from imperfections in its information-processing system, the ‘early-warning system,’ which had to be adapted to the new institutional equilibrium post-Lisbon. Because of this adaption process, factors exogenous to the parliamentary context (‘externalities’) as well as internal uncertainties (‘internalities’) add constant unpredictability to the Commission’s reading of the European Parliament.
id RCAP_1603bd2ef59c90bb32057a96c4f6eccd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4014
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade AgreementsEU trade policy; European Commission; European Parliament; information processing theory; trade agreements; vetoSince the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament wields the power of consent over international (trade) agreements, enabling it to threaten a veto. Due to the extensive financial and reputational costs associated with a veto, the European Commission (hereinafter Commission) was expected to read these threats effectively. However, the Commission’s responses to such threats have varied greatly. Building on a fine-grained causal mechanism derived from information processing theory and an extensive process-tracing analysis of seven free trade agreements post-Lisbon, we explain why the Commission has responded differently to looming vetoes. Our analysis reveals that the variation in Commission responses derives from imperfections in its information-processing system, the ‘early-warning system,’ which had to be adapted to the new institutional equilibrium post-Lisbon. Because of this adaption process, factors exogenous to the parliamentary context (‘externalities’) as well as internal uncertainties (‘internalities’) add constant unpredictability to the Commission’s reading of the European Parliament.Cogitatio2021-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4014oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4014Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 3 (2021): Resilient Institutions: The Impact of Rule Change on Policy Outputs in European Union Decision-Making Processes; 74-842183-2463reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4014https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4014https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4014/4014https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/4014/1661Copyright (c) 2021 Marie Peffenköver, Johan Adriaensenhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeffenköver, MarieAdriaensen, Johan2022-12-22T15:15:37Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4014Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:22:10.890854Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
spellingShingle Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
Peffenköver, Marie
EU trade policy; European Commission; European Parliament; information processing theory; trade agreements; veto
title_short Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_full Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_fullStr Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_full_unstemmed Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
title_sort Detecting Looming Vetoes: Getting the European Parliament’s Consent in Trade Agreements
author Peffenköver, Marie
author_facet Peffenköver, Marie
Adriaensen, Johan
author_role author
author2 Adriaensen, Johan
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Peffenköver, Marie
Adriaensen, Johan
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv EU trade policy; European Commission; European Parliament; information processing theory; trade agreements; veto
topic EU trade policy; European Commission; European Parliament; information processing theory; trade agreements; veto
description Since the implementation of the Lisbon Treaty, the European Parliament wields the power of consent over international (trade) agreements, enabling it to threaten a veto. Due to the extensive financial and reputational costs associated with a veto, the European Commission (hereinafter Commission) was expected to read these threats effectively. However, the Commission’s responses to such threats have varied greatly. Building on a fine-grained causal mechanism derived from information processing theory and an extensive process-tracing analysis of seven free trade agreements post-Lisbon, we explain why the Commission has responded differently to looming vetoes. Our analysis reveals that the variation in Commission responses derives from imperfections in its information-processing system, the ‘early-warning system,’ which had to be adapted to the new institutional equilibrium post-Lisbon. Because of this adaption process, factors exogenous to the parliamentary context (‘externalities’) as well as internal uncertainties (‘internalities’) add constant unpredictability to the Commission’s reading of the European Parliament.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-07-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4014
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4014
url https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4014
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4014
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4014
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4014
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4014/4014
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/downloadSuppFile/4014/1661
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Marie Peffenköver, Johan Adriaensen
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Marie Peffenköver, Johan Adriaensen
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Politics and Governance; Vol 9, No 3 (2021): Resilient Institutions: The Impact of Rule Change on Policy Outputs in European Union Decision-Making Processes; 74-84
2183-2463
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130668002705408