The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neves, Inês
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.21814/unio.9.2.5487
Resumo: Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’) is associated with several risks that need to be contained and mitigated through an appropriate AI governance framework. However, it is also crucial to take into account the opportunities and societal benefits of AI and to consider and respect businesses as key actors in the context of AI. The freedom to conduct a business is a fundamental right enshrined in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. It cannot be considered a diminished or functionalised right, nor are companies necessarily a threat to human rights or an obstacle to the pursuit of human-centred governance of AI. As in any scenario of conflict or collision between fundamental rights and interests, a fair balance must be struck between the subjective positions of different stakeholders. Ensuring respect for the freedom to conduct a business safeguards innovation and the flourishing of new opportunities that ultimately benefit citizens and the public interest. In the European Union legal system, AI governance will be shaped by both the ‘Artificial Intelligence Act’ and novel rules to address liability issues related to AI systems. While its prima facie content is affected by several provisions and obligations, in particular, for providers of high-risk AI systems, the EU legislator does not neglect the freedom to conduct a business. It seeks to provide legal certainty, ensure proportionality and address the special condition of small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups. However, the rigidity of some provisions and the approach to risk, together with the uncertainty that characterises the normative environment of the AI, leave room for improvement and for further escape valves, with the future application being of particular importance.
id RCAP_d350adbac26e02917bf0d195756538ed
oai_identifier_str oai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5487
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governanceArticleArtificial Intelligence (‘AI’) is associated with several risks that need to be contained and mitigated through an appropriate AI governance framework. However, it is also crucial to take into account the opportunities and societal benefits of AI and to consider and respect businesses as key actors in the context of AI. The freedom to conduct a business is a fundamental right enshrined in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. It cannot be considered a diminished or functionalised right, nor are companies necessarily a threat to human rights or an obstacle to the pursuit of human-centred governance of AI. As in any scenario of conflict or collision between fundamental rights and interests, a fair balance must be struck between the subjective positions of different stakeholders. Ensuring respect for the freedom to conduct a business safeguards innovation and the flourishing of new opportunities that ultimately benefit citizens and the public interest. In the European Union legal system, AI governance will be shaped by both the ‘Artificial Intelligence Act’ and novel rules to address liability issues related to AI systems. While its prima facie content is affected by several provisions and obligations, in particular, for providers of high-risk AI systems, the EU legislator does not neglect the freedom to conduct a business. It seeks to provide legal certainty, ensure proportionality and address the special condition of small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups. However, the rigidity of some provisions and the approach to risk, together with the uncertainty that characterises the normative environment of the AI, leave room for improvement and for further escape valves, with the future application being of particular importance.UMinho Editora2023-11-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.21814/unio.9.2.5487eng2183-3435Neves, Inêsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-23T16:15:19Zoai:journals.uminho.pt:article/5487Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T00:40:29.319482Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance
title The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance
spellingShingle The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance
Neves, Inês
Article
title_short The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance
title_full The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance
title_fullStr The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance
title_full_unstemmed The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance
title_sort The freedom to conduct a business as a driver for AI governance
author Neves, Inês
author_facet Neves, Inês
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neves, Inês
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Article
topic Article
description Artificial Intelligence (‘AI’) is associated with several risks that need to be contained and mitigated through an appropriate AI governance framework. However, it is also crucial to take into account the opportunities and societal benefits of AI and to consider and respect businesses as key actors in the context of AI. The freedom to conduct a business is a fundamental right enshrined in Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. It cannot be considered a diminished or functionalised right, nor are companies necessarily a threat to human rights or an obstacle to the pursuit of human-centred governance of AI. As in any scenario of conflict or collision between fundamental rights and interests, a fair balance must be struck between the subjective positions of different stakeholders. Ensuring respect for the freedom to conduct a business safeguards innovation and the flourishing of new opportunities that ultimately benefit citizens and the public interest. In the European Union legal system, AI governance will be shaped by both the ‘Artificial Intelligence Act’ and novel rules to address liability issues related to AI systems. While its prima facie content is affected by several provisions and obligations, in particular, for providers of high-risk AI systems, the EU legislator does not neglect the freedom to conduct a business. It seeks to provide legal certainty, ensure proportionality and address the special condition of small and medium-sized enterprises and start-ups. However, the rigidity of some provisions and the approach to risk, together with the uncertainty that characterises the normative environment of the AI, leave room for improvement and for further escape valves, with the future application being of particular importance.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.21814/unio.9.2.5487
url https://doi.org/10.21814/unio.9.2.5487
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2183-3435
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UMinho Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136309826027520