Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Geada, Pedro
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Oliveira, F., Loureiro, Luís, Esteves, D., Teixeira, J. A., Vasconcelos, Vítor, Vicente, A. A., Fernandes, Bruno D.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/60564
Resumo: This study has compared the harvesting efficiency of four flocculation methods, namely, induced by pH, FeCl3, AlCl3 and chitosan. No changes were observed on M. aeruginosa cells. Flocculation assays performed at pH 3 and 4 have shown the best harvesting efficiency among the pH-induced tests, reaching values above 90% after 8 h. The adjustment of zeta potential (ZP) to values comprised between 6.7 and 20.7 mV enhanced significantly the settling rates using flocculant agents, being FeCl3 the best example where increments up to 88% of harvesting efficiency were obtained. Although all the four methods tested have presented harvesting efficiencies above 91% within the first 8 h after the optimization process, the highest performance was obtained using 3.75 mg L1 of FeCl3, which allowed reaching 92% in 4 h.
id RCAP_d421e9169a65020ec79b553825f21047
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/60564
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiencyInduced flocculationZeta potentialHarvesting efficiencyMicrocystis aeruginosaScience & TechnologyThis study has compared the harvesting efficiency of four flocculation methods, namely, induced by pH, FeCl3, AlCl3 and chitosan. No changes were observed on M. aeruginosa cells. Flocculation assays performed at pH 3 and 4 have shown the best harvesting efficiency among the pH-induced tests, reaching values above 90% after 8 h. The adjustment of zeta potential (ZP) to values comprised between 6.7 and 20.7 mV enhanced significantly the settling rates using flocculant agents, being FeCl3 the best example where increments up to 88% of harvesting efficiency were obtained. Although all the four methods tested have presented harvesting efficiencies above 91% within the first 8 h after the optimization process, the highest performance was obtained using 3.75 mg L1 of FeCl3, which allowed reaching 92% in 4 h.This research work was supported by the grants SFRH/BPD/98694/2013 (Bruno Fernandes) and SFRH/BD/52335/2013 (Pedro Geada) from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Portugal). Luís Loureiro is recipient of a fellowship supported by a doctoral advanced training (call NORTE-69-2015-15) funded by the European Social Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. This study was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the FCT Strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2013 unit and COMPETE 2020 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684) and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. This study was also supported by the Project UID/Multi/04423/2013, the Project RECI/BBB-EBI/0179/2012 (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027462), and the project NOVELMAR (reference NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000035) co-financed by the North Portugal Regional Operational Programme (Norte 2020) under the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) through the ERDF.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionSpringer NatureUniversidade do MinhoGeada, PedroOliveira, F.Loureiro, LuísEsteves, D.Teixeira, J. A.Vasconcelos, VítorVicente, A. A.Fernandes, Bruno D.2019-062019-06-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/60564engGeada, Pedro; Oliveira, F.; Luís Loureiro; Esteves, D.; Teixeira, José A.; Vasconcelos, Vítor; Vicente, António A.; Fernandes, Bruno D., Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(16), 16708-16715, 20190944-13441614-749910.1007/s11356-019-04803-030993559http://www.springer.com/environment/journal/11356info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-16T01:19:53Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/60564Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:48:05.516126Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency
title Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency
spellingShingle Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency
Geada, Pedro
Induced flocculation
Zeta potential
Harvesting efficiency
Microcystis aeruginosa
Science & Technology
title_short Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency
title_full Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency
title_fullStr Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency
title_sort Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency
author Geada, Pedro
author_facet Geada, Pedro
Oliveira, F.
Loureiro, Luís
Esteves, D.
Teixeira, J. A.
Vasconcelos, Vítor
Vicente, A. A.
Fernandes, Bruno D.
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, F.
Loureiro, Luís
Esteves, D.
Teixeira, J. A.
Vasconcelos, Vítor
Vicente, A. A.
Fernandes, Bruno D.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Geada, Pedro
Oliveira, F.
Loureiro, Luís
Esteves, D.
Teixeira, J. A.
Vasconcelos, Vítor
Vicente, A. A.
Fernandes, Bruno D.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Induced flocculation
Zeta potential
Harvesting efficiency
Microcystis aeruginosa
Science & Technology
topic Induced flocculation
Zeta potential
Harvesting efficiency
Microcystis aeruginosa
Science & Technology
description This study has compared the harvesting efficiency of four flocculation methods, namely, induced by pH, FeCl3, AlCl3 and chitosan. No changes were observed on M. aeruginosa cells. Flocculation assays performed at pH 3 and 4 have shown the best harvesting efficiency among the pH-induced tests, reaching values above 90% after 8 h. The adjustment of zeta potential (ZP) to values comprised between 6.7 and 20.7 mV enhanced significantly the settling rates using flocculant agents, being FeCl3 the best example where increments up to 88% of harvesting efficiency were obtained. Although all the four methods tested have presented harvesting efficiencies above 91% within the first 8 h after the optimization process, the highest performance was obtained using 3.75 mg L1 of FeCl3, which allowed reaching 92% in 4 h.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06
2019-06-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/60564
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/60564
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Geada, Pedro; Oliveira, F.; Luís Loureiro; Esteves, D.; Teixeira, José A.; Vasconcelos, Vítor; Vicente, António A.; Fernandes, Bruno D., Comparison and optimization of different methods for Microcystis aeruginosa's harvesting and the role of zeta potential on its efficiency. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(16), 16708-16715, 2019
0944-1344
1614-7499
10.1007/s11356-019-04803-0
30993559
http://www.springer.com/environment/journal/11356
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133057967456256