Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927 |
Resumo: | To compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion: Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. |
id |
RCAP_d6131f48bc7a191543d76b2d77d6d5fe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/17927 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological resultsBreast B-mode ultrasonographyBreast lesionsMammographySensitivitySpecificitySonoelastographyTo compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion: Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.SapientiaPardal, Raquel ConstantinoAbrantes, AntónioRibeiro, Luís PedroAlmeida, RuiAzevedo, KevinFigueiredo, Teresa LeonorRodrigues, Sónia2022-07-07T15:15:35Z20132013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927eng10.1590/S0100-39842013000400007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:30:10Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/17927Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:07:47.289995Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
spellingShingle |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results Pardal, Raquel Constantino Breast B-mode ultrasonography Breast lesions Mammography Sensitivity Specificity Sonoelastography |
title_short |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title_full |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title_fullStr |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title_sort |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
author |
Pardal, Raquel Constantino |
author_facet |
Pardal, Raquel Constantino Abrantes, António Ribeiro, Luís Pedro Almeida, Rui Azevedo, Kevin Figueiredo, Teresa Leonor Rodrigues, Sónia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Abrantes, António Ribeiro, Luís Pedro Almeida, Rui Azevedo, Kevin Figueiredo, Teresa Leonor Rodrigues, Sónia |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Sapientia |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pardal, Raquel Constantino Abrantes, António Ribeiro, Luís Pedro Almeida, Rui Azevedo, Kevin Figueiredo, Teresa Leonor Rodrigues, Sónia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Breast B-mode ultrasonography Breast lesions Mammography Sensitivity Specificity Sonoelastography |
topic |
Breast B-mode ultrasonography Breast lesions Mammography Sensitivity Specificity Sonoelastography |
description |
To compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion: Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013 2013-01-01T00:00:00Z 2022-07-07T15:15:35Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-39842013000400007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133323643060224 |