Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pardal, Raquel Constantino
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Abrantes, António, Ribeiro, Luís Pedro, Almeida, Rui, Azevedo, Kevin, Figueiredo, Teresa Leonor, Rodrigues, Sónia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927
Resumo: To compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion: Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.
id RCAP_d6131f48bc7a191543d76b2d77d6d5fe
oai_identifier_str oai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/17927
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological resultsBreast B-mode ultrasonographyBreast lesionsMammographySensitivitySpecificitySonoelastographyTo compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion: Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.SapientiaPardal, Raquel ConstantinoAbrantes, AntónioRibeiro, Luís PedroAlmeida, RuiAzevedo, KevinFigueiredo, Teresa LeonorRodrigues, Sónia2022-07-07T15:15:35Z20132013-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927eng10.1590/S0100-39842013000400007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-24T10:30:10Zoai:sapientia.ualg.pt:10400.1/17927Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:07:47.289995Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
title Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
spellingShingle Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
Pardal, Raquel Constantino
Breast B-mode ultrasonography
Breast lesions
Mammography
Sensitivity
Specificity
Sonoelastography
title_short Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
title_full Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
title_fullStr Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
title_full_unstemmed Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
title_sort Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
author Pardal, Raquel Constantino
author_facet Pardal, Raquel Constantino
Abrantes, António
Ribeiro, Luís Pedro
Almeida, Rui
Azevedo, Kevin
Figueiredo, Teresa Leonor
Rodrigues, Sónia
author_role author
author2 Abrantes, António
Ribeiro, Luís Pedro
Almeida, Rui
Azevedo, Kevin
Figueiredo, Teresa Leonor
Rodrigues, Sónia
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Sapientia
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pardal, Raquel Constantino
Abrantes, António
Ribeiro, Luís Pedro
Almeida, Rui
Azevedo, Kevin
Figueiredo, Teresa Leonor
Rodrigues, Sónia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Breast B-mode ultrasonography
Breast lesions
Mammography
Sensitivity
Specificity
Sonoelastography
topic Breast B-mode ultrasonography
Breast lesions
Mammography
Sensitivity
Specificity
Sonoelastography
description To compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results: Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion: Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
2013-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-07-07T15:15:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.1/17927
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0100-39842013000400007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133323643060224