Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842013000400214 |
Resumo: | Objective To compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. |
id |
CBR-1_4cc12ccdfeb41891dfc79364dd3b24af |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0100-39842013000400214 |
network_acronym_str |
CBR-1 |
network_name_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological resultsBreast B-mode ultrasonographyBreast lesionsMammographySensitivitySpecificitySonoelastography Objective To compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem2013-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842013000400214Radiologia Brasileira v.46 n.4 2013reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online)instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)instacron:CBR10.1590/S0100-39842013000400007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPardal,Raquel ConstantinoAbrantes,António Fernando LagemRibeiro,Luís Pedro VieiraAlmeida,Rui Pedro PereiraAzevedo,Kevin BarrosFigueiredo,Teresa LeonorRodrigues,Sónia Isabeleng2015-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-39842013000400214Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/rb/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpradiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br1678-70990100-3984opendoar:2015-09-03T00:00Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
spellingShingle |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results Pardal,Raquel Constantino Breast B-mode ultrasonography Breast lesions Mammography Sensitivity Specificity Sonoelastography |
title_short |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title_full |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title_fullStr |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title_full_unstemmed |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
title_sort |
Screening of breast lesions: a comparative study between mammography, B-mode ultrasonography, sonoelastography and histological results |
author |
Pardal,Raquel Constantino |
author_facet |
Pardal,Raquel Constantino Abrantes,António Fernando Lagem Ribeiro,Luís Pedro Vieira Almeida,Rui Pedro Pereira Azevedo,Kevin Barros Figueiredo,Teresa Leonor Rodrigues,Sónia Isabel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Abrantes,António Fernando Lagem Ribeiro,Luís Pedro Vieira Almeida,Rui Pedro Pereira Azevedo,Kevin Barros Figueiredo,Teresa Leonor Rodrigues,Sónia Isabel |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pardal,Raquel Constantino Abrantes,António Fernando Lagem Ribeiro,Luís Pedro Vieira Almeida,Rui Pedro Pereira Azevedo,Kevin Barros Figueiredo,Teresa Leonor Rodrigues,Sónia Isabel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Breast B-mode ultrasonography Breast lesions Mammography Sensitivity Specificity Sonoelastography |
topic |
Breast B-mode ultrasonography Breast lesions Mammography Sensitivity Specificity Sonoelastography |
description |
Objective To compare the capacity of mammography, sonoelastography, B-mode ultrasonography and histological analysis to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods A total of 12 histopathologically confirmed breast lesions were documented. The lesions were assessed by means of mammography, B-mode ultrasonography and sonoelastography, and histopathological analysis was utilized as a gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the mentioned techniques. Results Sensitivity and specificity in the differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were respectively 100% and 50% for mammography, 100% and 71% for B-mode ultrasonography, and 67% and 83% for sonoelastography. The area under the ROC curve was calculated for the three imaging modalities and corresponded to 0.792 for mammography, 0.847 for B-mode ultrasonography, and 0.806 for sonoelastography. Conclusion Sonoelastography demonstrated higher specificity and lower sensitivity as compared with mammography and B-mode ultrasonography. On the other hand, B-mode ultrasonography had the largest area under the ROC curve. Sonoelastography has demonstrated to be a promising technique to detect and evaluate breast lesions, and could potentially reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842013000400214 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-39842013000400214 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0100-39842013000400007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Publicação do Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira v.46 n.4 2013 reponame:Radiologia Brasileira (Online) instname:Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) instacron:CBR |
instname_str |
Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
instacron_str |
CBR |
institution |
CBR |
reponame_str |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Radiologia Brasileira (Online) - Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
radiologiabrasileira@cbr.org.br |
_version_ |
1754208938457300992 |