Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Kucukural, Onder, Oruc, Raluni
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/116025
Resumo: UIDB/00183/2020 UIDP/00183/2020 TUBITAK/0010/2014
id RCAP_d859bf8dd4a55274b76f350da751ef8a
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/116025
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:A Review and Comparison of the Toulmin Model, Pragma-Dialectics, Political Discourse Analysis, and Argumentum Model of TopicsArgumentation theorydiscourse analysisinferencediscussiontopoiUIDB/00183/2020 UIDP/00183/2020 TUBITAK/0010/2014The inferential relation drawn between a reason and a claim constitutes the basis of all argument approaches and models. This article conducts a concept-based comparative literature review that aims to compile and compare four contemporary argument models that are used in the analysis of everyday discourse: the Toulmin Model, Pragma-Dialectics, Political Discourse Analysis, and Argumentum Model of Topics. Argumentation theory and models are inspired, on the one hand, by discursive approaches in the emphasis put on the content and context, and on the other, from analytical philosophy and logic in the application of rational norms and standards. Before examining the four models, developed in the framework of argumentation theory, the article positions the argument approach between the social constructionist and empirical approach of discourse analysis and the formal and normative approach of logic. In examining the four argument models and their analytical reconstruction operations, it seeks to clarify their approach to inferential relations in everyday communication and illustrate their analytical differences. Throughout the four sections, schematic illustrations of how each model reconstructs a simple everyday argument are thus provided. In the conclusion, the models are compared discussing the type of studies each model is most suitable for and the cases for which each can be used most fruitfully.Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)RUNUzelgun, Mehmet AliKucukural, OnderOruc, Raluni2021-04-22T22:47:30Z20202020-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article34application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/116025eng2636-8943PURE: 29333982https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0666info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:58:36Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/116025Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:42:55.379885Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:
A Review and Comparison of the Toulmin Model, Pragma-Dialectics, Political Discourse Analysis, and Argumentum Model of Topics
title Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:
spellingShingle Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:
Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali
Argumentation theory
discourse analysis
inference
discussion
topoi
title_short Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:
title_full Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:
title_fullStr Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:
title_full_unstemmed Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:
title_sort Four Approaches in Argumentation Analysis:
author Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali
author_facet Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali
Kucukural, Onder
Oruc, Raluni
author_role author
author2 Kucukural, Onder
Oruc, Raluni
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Filosofia da NOVA (IFILNOVA)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Uzelgun, Mehmet Ali
Kucukural, Onder
Oruc, Raluni
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Argumentation theory
discourse analysis
inference
discussion
topoi
topic Argumentation theory
discourse analysis
inference
discussion
topoi
description UIDB/00183/2020 UIDP/00183/2020 TUBITAK/0010/2014
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2020-01-01T00:00:00Z
2021-04-22T22:47:30Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/116025
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/116025
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2636-8943
PURE: 29333982
https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0666
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 34
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138039883104256

Registros relacionados