“On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Koivumäki, Kaisu
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Koivumäki, Timo, Karvonen, Erkki
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2812
Resumo: In contemporary media discourses, researchers may be perceived to communicate something they do not intend to, such as coldness or irrelevance. However, researchers are facing new responsibilities concerning how popular formats used to present science will impact science’s cultural authority (Bucchi, 2017). Currently, there is limited research on the microlevel practices of digital science communication involving researchers as actors. Therefore, this qualitative study explores how digital academic discourse practices develop, using the tweeting and blogging of researchers involved in a multidisciplinary renewable energy research project as a case. The results of a thematic analysis of interviews with researchers (n = 17) suggests that the researchers’ perceptions form a scale ranging from traditional to progressively adjusted practices, which are labelled ‘informing,’ ‘anchoring,’ ‘luring,’ and ‘maneuvering.’ These imply an attempt to diminish the gap between science and the public. The interviewees acknowledge that scientific facts may not be interesting and that they need captivating means that are common in the use of new media, such as buzzwords and clickbait. It appears that trials and experimentation with hybrid genres helped the researchers to distinguish the contours of digital academic discourses. The implications support suggestions to broaden the trajectories of expertise and communication, including issues of culture and identity, trust, and the relevance of science. It is argued that scientists’ embrace of new media channels will refine some articulations of the mediatization processes, and these findings support recent suggestions that mediatization could also be conceptualized as a strategic resource.
id RCAP_dcdbce4dd363bf6184d8e99d6c677621
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2812
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicatorscommunication; media research; new media; science communication; social mediaIn contemporary media discourses, researchers may be perceived to communicate something they do not intend to, such as coldness or irrelevance. However, researchers are facing new responsibilities concerning how popular formats used to present science will impact science’s cultural authority (Bucchi, 2017). Currently, there is limited research on the microlevel practices of digital science communication involving researchers as actors. Therefore, this qualitative study explores how digital academic discourse practices develop, using the tweeting and blogging of researchers involved in a multidisciplinary renewable energy research project as a case. The results of a thematic analysis of interviews with researchers (n = 17) suggests that the researchers’ perceptions form a scale ranging from traditional to progressively adjusted practices, which are labelled ‘informing,’ ‘anchoring,’ ‘luring,’ and ‘maneuvering.’ These imply an attempt to diminish the gap between science and the public. The interviewees acknowledge that scientific facts may not be interesting and that they need captivating means that are common in the use of new media, such as buzzwords and clickbait. It appears that trials and experimentation with hybrid genres helped the researchers to distinguish the contours of digital academic discourses. The implications support suggestions to broaden the trajectories of expertise and communication, including issues of culture and identity, trust, and the relevance of science. It is argued that scientists’ embrace of new media channels will refine some articulations of the mediatization processes, and these findings support recent suggestions that mediatization could also be conceptualized as a strategic resource.Cogitatio2020-06-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2812oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2812Media and Communication; Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Health and Science Controversies in the Digital World: News, Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement; 425-4392183-2439reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2812https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2812https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2812/2812Copyright (c) 2020 Kaisu Koivumäki, Timo Koivumäki, Erkki Karvonenhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKoivumäki, KaisuKoivumäki, TimoKarvonen, Erkki2022-12-20T10:58:44Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2812Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:07.396182Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators
title “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators
spellingShingle “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators
Koivumäki, Kaisu
communication; media research; new media; science communication; social media
title_short “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators
title_full “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators
title_fullStr “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators
title_full_unstemmed “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators
title_sort “On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators
author Koivumäki, Kaisu
author_facet Koivumäki, Kaisu
Koivumäki, Timo
Karvonen, Erkki
author_role author
author2 Koivumäki, Timo
Karvonen, Erkki
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Koivumäki, Kaisu
Koivumäki, Timo
Karvonen, Erkki
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv communication; media research; new media; science communication; social media
topic communication; media research; new media; science communication; social media
description In contemporary media discourses, researchers may be perceived to communicate something they do not intend to, such as coldness or irrelevance. However, researchers are facing new responsibilities concerning how popular formats used to present science will impact science’s cultural authority (Bucchi, 2017). Currently, there is limited research on the microlevel practices of digital science communication involving researchers as actors. Therefore, this qualitative study explores how digital academic discourse practices develop, using the tweeting and blogging of researchers involved in a multidisciplinary renewable energy research project as a case. The results of a thematic analysis of interviews with researchers (n = 17) suggests that the researchers’ perceptions form a scale ranging from traditional to progressively adjusted practices, which are labelled ‘informing,’ ‘anchoring,’ ‘luring,’ and ‘maneuvering.’ These imply an attempt to diminish the gap between science and the public. The interviewees acknowledge that scientific facts may not be interesting and that they need captivating means that are common in the use of new media, such as buzzwords and clickbait. It appears that trials and experimentation with hybrid genres helped the researchers to distinguish the contours of digital academic discourses. The implications support suggestions to broaden the trajectories of expertise and communication, including issues of culture and identity, trust, and the relevance of science. It is argued that scientists’ embrace of new media channels will refine some articulations of the mediatization processes, and these findings support recent suggestions that mediatization could also be conceptualized as a strategic resource.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-06-25
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2812
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2812
url https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2812
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/2812
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2812
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2812
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2812/2812
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Kaisu Koivumäki, Timo Koivumäki, Erkki Karvonen
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Kaisu Koivumäki, Timo Koivumäki, Erkki Karvonen
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Media and Communication; Vol 8, No 2 (2020): Health and Science Controversies in the Digital World: News, Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement; 425-439
2183-2439
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130658113585152