Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/4309 |
Resumo: | This dissertation conveys a swot-analysis of options and futures, partially based on their fundamentals as described in the appendices, with regards to their convenience for an entry. Further, this convenience comparison is reinforced with a view to two of the world’s biggest derivative exchanges, Eurex and Liffe, and examines them in terms of their product lines, trading volume and transaction fees. All-encompassing, the analysis concludes that futures are the most convenient derivative for an entry on the derivative markets, which the analysis of two derivative exchanges substantiates. Additionally, Eurex slightly favours an entry with futures above Liffe, mainly due to higher trading volume and intercessional transaction fees. Apart from that neutral analysis, the studies of general information such as the comprehension of the market as well as price movements are basic prerequisites for an entry. This leads to the recommendable aspect that the convenience of futures need to be seen from a different angle under certain circumstances or scenarios such as personal preference, the level of risk-tolerance and personal wealth. |
id |
RCAP_e0581282c75a27671e9b8f800143ced6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/4309 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffeConvenienceOptionsFuturesEurexLiffeConveniênciaOpçõesFuturosThis dissertation conveys a swot-analysis of options and futures, partially based on their fundamentals as described in the appendices, with regards to their convenience for an entry. Further, this convenience comparison is reinforced with a view to two of the world’s biggest derivative exchanges, Eurex and Liffe, and examines them in terms of their product lines, trading volume and transaction fees. All-encompassing, the analysis concludes that futures are the most convenient derivative for an entry on the derivative markets, which the analysis of two derivative exchanges substantiates. Additionally, Eurex slightly favours an entry with futures above Liffe, mainly due to higher trading volume and intercessional transaction fees. Apart from that neutral analysis, the studies of general information such as the comprehension of the market as well as price movements are basic prerequisites for an entry. This leads to the recommendable aspect that the convenience of futures need to be seen from a different angle under certain circumstances or scenarios such as personal preference, the level of risk-tolerance and personal wealth.Esta dissertação parte de uma análise SWOT de opções e futuros, parcialmente baseados nos seus fundamentos como estão descritos nos apêndices, tendo em conta a conveniência da sua entrada. Mais à frente, esta comparação de conveniência é reforçada com uma visão de duas das maiores bolsas de produtos derivados do mundo, Eurex e Liffe, e examina-as em termos das suas linhas de produto, volume de negócios e custos de transacção. Abrangendo tudo isto, a análise conclui que os futuros são os produtos derivados mais convenientes para uma entrada nos mercados de derivados. A Eurex favorece ligeiramente uma entrada com futuros, mais do que a Liffe, principalmente devido a um volume de negócios superior e a custos de transacção intermédios. Fora dessa análise neutra, os estudos de informação, a compreensão do mercado, bem como as flutuações dos preços são pré-requisitos básico para uma entrada. Isto leva-nos a um aspecto recomendável de que a conveniência de futuros devem ser vistos de um outro ponto de vista, noutras circunstancias, ou cenários tais como, preferências pessoais , o nível de tolerância ao risco e riqueza pessoal.2013-01-04T12:10:36Z2011-01-01T00:00:00Z20112011-04info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfapplication/octet-streamhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/4309engNeumann, Arneinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:41:51Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/4309Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:19:31.216592Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe |
title |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe |
spellingShingle |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe Neumann, Arne Convenience Options Futures Eurex Liffe Conveniência Opções Futuros |
title_short |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe |
title_full |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe |
title_fullStr |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe |
title_sort |
Assembly and preparation for the derivative market: a convenience comparison between financial options and futures with view to the eurex and liffe |
author |
Neumann, Arne |
author_facet |
Neumann, Arne |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neumann, Arne |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Convenience Options Futures Eurex Liffe Conveniência Opções Futuros |
topic |
Convenience Options Futures Eurex Liffe Conveniência Opções Futuros |
description |
This dissertation conveys a swot-analysis of options and futures, partially based on their fundamentals as described in the appendices, with regards to their convenience for an entry. Further, this convenience comparison is reinforced with a view to two of the world’s biggest derivative exchanges, Eurex and Liffe, and examines them in terms of their product lines, trading volume and transaction fees. All-encompassing, the analysis concludes that futures are the most convenient derivative for an entry on the derivative markets, which the analysis of two derivative exchanges substantiates. Additionally, Eurex slightly favours an entry with futures above Liffe, mainly due to higher trading volume and intercessional transaction fees. Apart from that neutral analysis, the studies of general information such as the comprehension of the market as well as price movements are basic prerequisites for an entry. This leads to the recommendable aspect that the convenience of futures need to be seen from a different angle under certain circumstances or scenarios such as personal preference, the level of risk-tolerance and personal wealth. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01T00:00:00Z 2011 2011-04 2013-01-04T12:10:36Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/4309 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/4309 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/octet-stream |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799134755006971904 |