Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Panetta, Alessandro
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/38565
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate, through an umbrella review, whether primary and permanent teeth can be definitively restored with glass ionomer cements. A systematic search of the studies available in the literature was conducted in the electronic databases MEDLINE/Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science. Two independent, calibrated examiners. The eligibility criteria were: (1) to be a systematic review (2) to evaluate the clinical longevity of glass ionomer cements (GICs) in primary and permanent teeth (3) to be clinical trials. The systematic reviews that met these criteria were reviewed in their entirety and those who presented at least one of the following exclusion criteria were then considered ineligible: (1) not being a systematic review of clinical trials; (2) not evaluating the longevity/clinical performance of GICs; (3) studies of dental restorative materials in teeth with enamel alterations. Methodological quality was measured using the AMSTAR-2 tool and the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews by the ROBIS tool. The level of evidence analysis was performed using the GRADE tool. Twenty-four eligible articles were identified, only 13 articles were included. Glass ionomer cements seems to be a viable choice in both dentitions, but primary dentition presents more evidence, especially regarding the ART technique. There is conflicting evidence on which type of glass ionomer is the best and comparisons to other dental materials are lacking. In conclusion, more high-quality studies are needed with longer follow up periods (>6 years), especially in permanent teeth.
id RCAP_e09c3de763e9e5159a5ebcc676601cd5
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/38565
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella reviewGlass ionomer cementUmbrella reviewPrimary teethPermanent teethDomínio/Área Científica::Ciências Médicas::Outras Ciências MédicasThe aim of this study was to evaluate, through an umbrella review, whether primary and permanent teeth can be definitively restored with glass ionomer cements. A systematic search of the studies available in the literature was conducted in the electronic databases MEDLINE/Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science. Two independent, calibrated examiners. The eligibility criteria were: (1) to be a systematic review (2) to evaluate the clinical longevity of glass ionomer cements (GICs) in primary and permanent teeth (3) to be clinical trials. The systematic reviews that met these criteria were reviewed in their entirety and those who presented at least one of the following exclusion criteria were then considered ineligible: (1) not being a systematic review of clinical trials; (2) not evaluating the longevity/clinical performance of GICs; (3) studies of dental restorative materials in teeth with enamel alterations. Methodological quality was measured using the AMSTAR-2 tool and the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews by the ROBIS tool. The level of evidence analysis was performed using the GRADE tool. Twenty-four eligible articles were identified, only 13 articles were included. Glass ionomer cements seems to be a viable choice in both dentitions, but primary dentition presents more evidence, especially regarding the ART technique. There is conflicting evidence on which type of glass ionomer is the best and comparisons to other dental materials are lacking. In conclusion, more high-quality studies are needed with longer follow up periods (>6 years), especially in permanent teeth.Moura, Anna Carolina Volpi Mello deSousa, Rute Patrícia Alves do Rio Pereira deVeritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica PortuguesaPanetta, Alessandro2022-08-09T14:10:36Z2022-07-1520222022-07-15T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/38565TID:203050053enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-12T17:44:03Zoai:repositorio.ucp.pt:10400.14/38565Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T18:31:29.868696Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review
title Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review
spellingShingle Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review
Panetta, Alessandro
Glass ionomer cement
Umbrella review
Primary teeth
Permanent teeth
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Médicas::Outras Ciências Médicas
title_short Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review
title_full Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review
title_fullStr Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review
title_full_unstemmed Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review
title_sort Use of glass-ionomer cement as a restorative material : an umbrella review
author Panetta, Alessandro
author_facet Panetta, Alessandro
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Moura, Anna Carolina Volpi Mello de
Sousa, Rute Patrícia Alves do Rio Pereira de
Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Panetta, Alessandro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glass ionomer cement
Umbrella review
Primary teeth
Permanent teeth
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Médicas::Outras Ciências Médicas
topic Glass ionomer cement
Umbrella review
Primary teeth
Permanent teeth
Domínio/Área Científica::Ciências Médicas::Outras Ciências Médicas
description The aim of this study was to evaluate, through an umbrella review, whether primary and permanent teeth can be definitively restored with glass ionomer cements. A systematic search of the studies available in the literature was conducted in the electronic databases MEDLINE/Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science. Two independent, calibrated examiners. The eligibility criteria were: (1) to be a systematic review (2) to evaluate the clinical longevity of glass ionomer cements (GICs) in primary and permanent teeth (3) to be clinical trials. The systematic reviews that met these criteria were reviewed in their entirety and those who presented at least one of the following exclusion criteria were then considered ineligible: (1) not being a systematic review of clinical trials; (2) not evaluating the longevity/clinical performance of GICs; (3) studies of dental restorative materials in teeth with enamel alterations. Methodological quality was measured using the AMSTAR-2 tool and the risk of bias of the included systematic reviews by the ROBIS tool. The level of evidence analysis was performed using the GRADE tool. Twenty-four eligible articles were identified, only 13 articles were included. Glass ionomer cements seems to be a viable choice in both dentitions, but primary dentition presents more evidence, especially regarding the ART technique. There is conflicting evidence on which type of glass ionomer is the best and comparisons to other dental materials are lacking. In conclusion, more high-quality studies are needed with longer follow up periods (>6 years), especially in permanent teeth.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-09T14:10:36Z
2022-07-15
2022
2022-07-15T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/38565
TID:203050053
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/38565
identifier_str_mv TID:203050053
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132038403457024