Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Pascotto, Renata Correa, Sanches Borges, Ana Flavia, Soares, Carlos Jose, Raggio, Daniela Procida, Rios, Daniela, Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP], Molina, Gustavo Fabian, Hien Chi Ngo, Miletic, Ivana, Frencken, Jo, Wang, Linda, Menezes-Silva, Rafael, Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria, Carvalho, Ricardo Marins de, Gurgan, Sevil, Leal, Soraya Goelho, Tuzuner, Tamer, Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP], Nicholson, John William, Sidhu, Sharanbir Kaur
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103609
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210742
Resumo: Objective: The aim of this paper is to present the results of a consensus meeting on the threshold property requirements for the clinical use of conventional glass-ionomer cements (GICs) for restorative indications. Methods: Twenty-one experts on GICs evaluated the results of tests on mechanical and optical properties of 18 different brands of restorative GICs: Bioglass R [B], Chemfil Rock [CR], Equia Forte [EF], Gold Label 2 [GL2], Gold Label 9 [GL9], Glass Ionomer Cement II [GI], Ionglass [IG], Ion Z [IZ], Ionomaster [IM], Ionofil Plus [IP], Ionostar Plus [IS], Ketac Molar Easymix [KM], Magic Glass [MG], Maxxion R [MA], Riva Self Cure [R], Vidrion R [V], Vitro Fil [VF] and Vitro Molar [VM]. All experiments were carried out by a team of researchers from Brazil and England following strict protocols, under the same laboratory conditions throughout, and maintaining data integrity. Results: There was consensus on: determining as primary properties of the material: compressive strength, microhardness, acid erosion and fluoride release, and as secondary properties: contrast ratio and translucency parameter, in order to rank the materials. Seven brands were below the thresholds for restorative indications: IZ, IM, IG, MA, VF, B and MG. Conclusions: Based on the primary properties adopted as being essential for restorative indications, the conventional restorative GICs that met the thresholds and could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials were: EF, GI, GL9, KM, IP, GL2, IS, CR, V, VM and R. A decision-making process to select the best GIC must also include results from clinical trials. Clinical significance: This study provides a ranking of GICs that could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials based on their main properties.
id UNSP_bc643d2f0241f18a31d3a32f3ffc3e25
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210742
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indicationsGlass-ionomer cementsBiomaterial(s)BiomechanicsCementClinical practice guidelinesObjective: The aim of this paper is to present the results of a consensus meeting on the threshold property requirements for the clinical use of conventional glass-ionomer cements (GICs) for restorative indications. Methods: Twenty-one experts on GICs evaluated the results of tests on mechanical and optical properties of 18 different brands of restorative GICs: Bioglass R [B], Chemfil Rock [CR], Equia Forte [EF], Gold Label 2 [GL2], Gold Label 9 [GL9], Glass Ionomer Cement II [GI], Ionglass [IG], Ion Z [IZ], Ionomaster [IM], Ionofil Plus [IP], Ionostar Plus [IS], Ketac Molar Easymix [KM], Magic Glass [MG], Maxxion R [MA], Riva Self Cure [R], Vidrion R [V], Vitro Fil [VF] and Vitro Molar [VM]. All experiments were carried out by a team of researchers from Brazil and England following strict protocols, under the same laboratory conditions throughout, and maintaining data integrity. Results: There was consensus on: determining as primary properties of the material: compressive strength, microhardness, acid erosion and fluoride release, and as secondary properties: contrast ratio and translucency parameter, in order to rank the materials. Seven brands were below the thresholds for restorative indications: IZ, IM, IG, MA, VF, B and MG. Conclusions: Based on the primary properties adopted as being essential for restorative indications, the conventional restorative GICs that met the thresholds and could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials were: EF, GI, GL9, KM, IP, GL2, IS, CR, V, VM and R. A decision-making process to select the best GIC must also include results from clinical trials. Clinical significance: This study provides a ranking of GICs that could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials based on their main properties.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Restorat Dent, Bauru Sch Dent, Alameda Dr Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Maringa, Dept Restorat Dent, Av Colombo 5790 Jd, BR-87020900 Maringa, Parana, BrazilUniv Fed Uberlandia, Dept Restorat Dent, Av Joao Naves Avila 2121, BR-38408100 Uberlandia, MG, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Av Prof Lineu Prestes 2227, BR-05508000 Butanta, SP, BrazilState Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Sci & Technol, Av Engn Francisco Jose Longo 777, BR-1224500 Sao Jose Dos Campos, BrazilUniv Catolica Cordoba, Obispo Trejo 323,X5000 IYG, Cordoba, ArgentinaUniv Western Australia, OHCWA, 512,17 Monash Ave, Nedlands, WA 6009, AustraliaUniv Zagreb, Sch Dent Med, Gunduliceva Ul 5, Zagreb 10000, CroatiaRadboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Dent, Philips van Leydenlaan 25, NL-6525 EX Nijmegen, NetherlandsUniv Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Av Limeira 901, BR-13414903 Piracicaba, BrazilUniv British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, CanadaHacettepe Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-06800 Ankara, TurkeyUniv Brasilia, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, BrazilKaradeniz Tek Univ, TR-61080 Trabzon, TurkeyState Univ Sao Paulo, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Rua Jose Bonifacio 1193, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, BrazilBluefield Ctr Biomat, Unit 34, 67-68 Hatton Garden, London EC1N 8JY, EnglandQueen Mary Univ London, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, EnglandState Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Sci & Technol, Av Engn Francisco Jose Longo 777, BR-1224500 Sao Jose Dos Campos, BrazilState Univ Sao Paulo, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Rua Jose Bonifacio 1193, BR-16015050 Aracatuba, BrazilFAPESP: 2018/01616-9CNPq: 312060/2017-3Elsevier B.V.Universidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Univ Catolica CordobaUniv Western AustraliaUniv ZagrebRadboud Univ NijmegenUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Univ British ColumbiaHacettepe UnivUniversidade de Brasília (UnB)Karadeniz Tek UnivBluefield Ctr BiomatQueen Mary Univ LondonLima Navarro, Maria Fidela dePascotto, Renata CorreaSanches Borges, Ana FlaviaSoares, Carlos JoseRaggio, Daniela ProcidaRios, DanielaBresciani, Eduardo [UNESP]Molina, Gustavo FabianHien Chi NgoMiletic, IvanaFrencken, JoWang, LindaMenezes-Silva, RafaelPuppin-Rontani, Regina MariaCarvalho, Ricardo Marins deGurgan, SevilLeal, Soraya GoelhoTuzuner, TamerFagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]Nicholson, John WilliamSidhu, Sharanbir Kaur2021-06-26T04:31:05Z2021-06-26T04:31:05Z2021-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article8http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103609Journal Of Dentistry. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 107, 8 p., 2021.0300-5712http://hdl.handle.net/11449/21074210.1016/j.jdent.2021.103609WOS:000636793800003Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal Of Dentistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T22:13:59Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/210742Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:23:14.598801Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications
title Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications
spellingShingle Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications
Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela de
Glass-ionomer cements
Biomaterial(s)
Biomechanics
Cement
Clinical practice guidelines
title_short Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications
title_full Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications
title_fullStr Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications
title_full_unstemmed Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications
title_sort Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications
author Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela de
author_facet Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela de
Pascotto, Renata Correa
Sanches Borges, Ana Flavia
Soares, Carlos Jose
Raggio, Daniela Procida
Rios, Daniela
Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP]
Molina, Gustavo Fabian
Hien Chi Ngo
Miletic, Ivana
Frencken, Jo
Wang, Linda
Menezes-Silva, Rafael
Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria
Carvalho, Ricardo Marins de
Gurgan, Sevil
Leal, Soraya Goelho
Tuzuner, Tamer
Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]
Nicholson, John William
Sidhu, Sharanbir Kaur
author_role author
author2 Pascotto, Renata Correa
Sanches Borges, Ana Flavia
Soares, Carlos Jose
Raggio, Daniela Procida
Rios, Daniela
Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP]
Molina, Gustavo Fabian
Hien Chi Ngo
Miletic, Ivana
Frencken, Jo
Wang, Linda
Menezes-Silva, Rafael
Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria
Carvalho, Ricardo Marins de
Gurgan, Sevil
Leal, Soraya Goelho
Tuzuner, Tamer
Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]
Nicholson, John William
Sidhu, Sharanbir Kaur
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual de Maringá (UEM)
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (UFU)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Univ Catolica Cordoba
Univ Western Australia
Univ Zagreb
Radboud Univ Nijmegen
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Univ British Columbia
Hacettepe Univ
Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
Karadeniz Tek Univ
Bluefield Ctr Biomat
Queen Mary Univ London
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela de
Pascotto, Renata Correa
Sanches Borges, Ana Flavia
Soares, Carlos Jose
Raggio, Daniela Procida
Rios, Daniela
Bresciani, Eduardo [UNESP]
Molina, Gustavo Fabian
Hien Chi Ngo
Miletic, Ivana
Frencken, Jo
Wang, Linda
Menezes-Silva, Rafael
Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria
Carvalho, Ricardo Marins de
Gurgan, Sevil
Leal, Soraya Goelho
Tuzuner, Tamer
Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari [UNESP]
Nicholson, John William
Sidhu, Sharanbir Kaur
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Glass-ionomer cements
Biomaterial(s)
Biomechanics
Cement
Clinical practice guidelines
topic Glass-ionomer cements
Biomaterial(s)
Biomechanics
Cement
Clinical practice guidelines
description Objective: The aim of this paper is to present the results of a consensus meeting on the threshold property requirements for the clinical use of conventional glass-ionomer cements (GICs) for restorative indications. Methods: Twenty-one experts on GICs evaluated the results of tests on mechanical and optical properties of 18 different brands of restorative GICs: Bioglass R [B], Chemfil Rock [CR], Equia Forte [EF], Gold Label 2 [GL2], Gold Label 9 [GL9], Glass Ionomer Cement II [GI], Ionglass [IG], Ion Z [IZ], Ionomaster [IM], Ionofil Plus [IP], Ionostar Plus [IS], Ketac Molar Easymix [KM], Magic Glass [MG], Maxxion R [MA], Riva Self Cure [R], Vidrion R [V], Vitro Fil [VF] and Vitro Molar [VM]. All experiments were carried out by a team of researchers from Brazil and England following strict protocols, under the same laboratory conditions throughout, and maintaining data integrity. Results: There was consensus on: determining as primary properties of the material: compressive strength, microhardness, acid erosion and fluoride release, and as secondary properties: contrast ratio and translucency parameter, in order to rank the materials. Seven brands were below the thresholds for restorative indications: IZ, IM, IG, MA, VF, B and MG. Conclusions: Based on the primary properties adopted as being essential for restorative indications, the conventional restorative GICs that met the thresholds and could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials were: EF, GI, GL9, KM, IP, GL2, IS, CR, V, VM and R. A decision-making process to select the best GIC must also include results from clinical trials. Clinical significance: This study provides a ranking of GICs that could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials based on their main properties.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-26T04:31:05Z
2021-06-26T04:31:05Z
2021-04-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103609
Journal Of Dentistry. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 107, 8 p., 2021.
0300-5712
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210742
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103609
WOS:000636793800003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103609
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/210742
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Dentistry. Oxford: Elsevier Sci Ltd, v. 107, 8 p., 2021.
0300-5712
10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103609
WOS:000636793800003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Dentistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 8
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128803016278016