The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2021.10008 |
Resumo: | The importance of digital platforms and related data-driven business models is ever increasing and poses challenges to the workability of competition in the respective markets (tendencies towards dominant platforms, paying-with-data instead of traditional money, privacy concerns, etc.). Due to such challenges, investigations of such markets are of high interest. One of the recent cases is the investigation of Facebook’s data collection practices by German competition authorities. Our article, in contrast to the wide stream of legal studies on this case, aims to analyse whether Facebook’s practices regarding data collection could constitute an abuse of market power from an economic perspective, more specifically against the background of modern data economics. In doing so we summarise the state of the advanced theories, including influences from behavioural economics addressing such markets, and discuss four potential theories of harm. |
id |
RCAP_e181519d0e43427885c2851e1acd00d9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10008 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collectionThe importance of digital platforms and related data-driven business models is ever increasing and poses challenges to the workability of competition in the respective markets (tendencies towards dominant platforms, paying-with-data instead of traditional money, privacy concerns, etc.). Due to such challenges, investigations of such markets are of high interest. One of the recent cases is the investigation of Facebook’s data collection practices by German competition authorities. Our article, in contrast to the wide stream of legal studies on this case, aims to analyse whether Facebook’s practices regarding data collection could constitute an abuse of market power from an economic perspective, more specifically against the background of modern data economics. In doing so we summarise the state of the advanced theories, including influences from behavioural economics addressing such markets, and discuss four potential theories of harm.Universidade Católica Editora2021-04-15T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2021.10008oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10008Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 5 No 1 (2021); 43-80Market and Competition Law Review; v. 5 n. 1 (2021); 43-802184-000810.34632/mclawreview.2021.5.1reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10008https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2021.10008https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10008/9734Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Budzinski, Marina Grusevaja, Victoriia Noskovahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBudzinski, OliverGrusevaja, MarinaNoskova, Victoriia2022-09-23T15:10:28Zoai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10008Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:03:42.882382Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection |
title |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection |
spellingShingle |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection Budzinski, Oliver |
title_short |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection |
title_full |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection |
title_fullStr |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection |
title_full_unstemmed |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection |
title_sort |
The economics of the German investigation of Facebook’s data collection |
author |
Budzinski, Oliver |
author_facet |
Budzinski, Oliver Grusevaja, Marina Noskova, Victoriia |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Grusevaja, Marina Noskova, Victoriia |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Budzinski, Oliver Grusevaja, Marina Noskova, Victoriia |
description |
The importance of digital platforms and related data-driven business models is ever increasing and poses challenges to the workability of competition in the respective markets (tendencies towards dominant platforms, paying-with-data instead of traditional money, privacy concerns, etc.). Due to such challenges, investigations of such markets are of high interest. One of the recent cases is the investigation of Facebook’s data collection practices by German competition authorities. Our article, in contrast to the wide stream of legal studies on this case, aims to analyse whether Facebook’s practices regarding data collection could constitute an abuse of market power from an economic perspective, more specifically against the background of modern data economics. In doing so we summarise the state of the advanced theories, including influences from behavioural economics addressing such markets, and discuss four potential theories of harm. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-04-15T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2021.10008 oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10008 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2021.10008 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revistas.ucp.pt:article/10008 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10008 https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2021.10008 https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/10008/9734 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Budzinski, Marina Grusevaja, Victoriia Noskova http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Budzinski, Marina Grusevaja, Victoriia Noskova http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Editora |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Católica Editora |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Market and Competition Law Review; Vol 5 No 1 (2021); 43-80 Market and Competition Law Review; v. 5 n. 1 (2021); 43-80 2184-0008 10.34632/mclawreview.2021.5.1 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130500690870272 |