The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Crispin, Darla
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.34624/impar.v3i2.14146
Resumo: In the earliest days of developing the discourses pertinent to artistic research, the apparent openness of its territory was vital in order that the varied protagonists engaging with it in the manner of pioneers could each recognise themselves within it while remaining open to the often-divergent needs and natures of others around them. This notionally deterritorialized domain had a utopian quality, serving as an idealized zone in which artists might be able to exist and work on their own terms while contributing to something new: a meta-discourse that would generate new and more inclusive kinds of ‘knowing’. Responding to that potential, in 2009, Kathleen Coessens, Darla Crispin and Anne Douglas published The Artistic Turn: A Manifesto, an early analysis of the emergent artistic research field, using Gilles Deleuze’s and Felix Guattari’s metaphorical concepts of deterritorialization and reterritorialization to point up some of the promises – and pitfalls – to be found within the emergent artistic research field. Ten years after the publication of that book, it seems appropriate to return to the text, to reflect on its analysis of that dualistic approach to territory and to test it against more recent developments. This is also an opportunity to point up some of the ‘red flags’ around potential disciplinary shortcomings in artistic research – and to make tentative suggestions as to how these might be overcome. The essay proposes a model that emphasises the rhizomic interconnectedness of the territories of artistic research. It argues that the nature of this ‘saturated connectedness’, free from privileged or marginalised elements and continuously dynamic in its functioning, is as crucial to an understanding of artistic research as is a proper comprehension of the separate identities of the territories themselves.
id RCAP_e1aebeecf0319a09d84eb7ff320d06e3
oai_identifier_str oai:proa.ua.pt:article/14146
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str
spelling The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic ResearchIn the earliest days of developing the discourses pertinent to artistic research, the apparent openness of its territory was vital in order that the varied protagonists engaging with it in the manner of pioneers could each recognise themselves within it while remaining open to the often-divergent needs and natures of others around them. This notionally deterritorialized domain had a utopian quality, serving as an idealized zone in which artists might be able to exist and work on their own terms while contributing to something new: a meta-discourse that would generate new and more inclusive kinds of ‘knowing’. Responding to that potential, in 2009, Kathleen Coessens, Darla Crispin and Anne Douglas published The Artistic Turn: A Manifesto, an early analysis of the emergent artistic research field, using Gilles Deleuze’s and Felix Guattari’s metaphorical concepts of deterritorialization and reterritorialization to point up some of the promises – and pitfalls – to be found within the emergent artistic research field. Ten years after the publication of that book, it seems appropriate to return to the text, to reflect on its analysis of that dualistic approach to territory and to test it against more recent developments. This is also an opportunity to point up some of the ‘red flags’ around potential disciplinary shortcomings in artistic research – and to make tentative suggestions as to how these might be overcome. The essay proposes a model that emphasises the rhizomic interconnectedness of the territories of artistic research. It argues that the nature of this ‘saturated connectedness’, free from privileged or marginalised elements and continuously dynamic in its functioning, is as crucial to an understanding of artistic research as is a proper comprehension of the separate identities of the territories themselves.UA Editora2019-12-30T00:00:00Zjournal articlejournal articlejournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34624/impar.v3i2.14146oai:proa.ua.pt:article/14146ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; Vol 3 No 2 (2019): IMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; 45-59ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2019): IMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; 45-59ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; Vol. 3 No 2 (2019): IMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; 45-59ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; vol. 3 n.º 2 (2019): IMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; 45-592184-1993reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://proa.ua.pt/index.php/impar/article/view/14146https://doi.org/10.34624/impar.v3i2.14146https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/impar/article/view/14146/9802Copyright (c) 2020 ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Researchhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCrispin, Darla2022-09-05T15:22:17ZPortal AgregadorONG
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research
title The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research
spellingShingle The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research
Crispin, Darla
title_short The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research
title_full The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research
title_fullStr The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research
title_full_unstemmed The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research
title_sort The Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization of Artistic Research
author Crispin, Darla
author_facet Crispin, Darla
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Crispin, Darla
description In the earliest days of developing the discourses pertinent to artistic research, the apparent openness of its territory was vital in order that the varied protagonists engaging with it in the manner of pioneers could each recognise themselves within it while remaining open to the often-divergent needs and natures of others around them. This notionally deterritorialized domain had a utopian quality, serving as an idealized zone in which artists might be able to exist and work on their own terms while contributing to something new: a meta-discourse that would generate new and more inclusive kinds of ‘knowing’. Responding to that potential, in 2009, Kathleen Coessens, Darla Crispin and Anne Douglas published The Artistic Turn: A Manifesto, an early analysis of the emergent artistic research field, using Gilles Deleuze’s and Felix Guattari’s metaphorical concepts of deterritorialization and reterritorialization to point up some of the promises – and pitfalls – to be found within the emergent artistic research field. Ten years after the publication of that book, it seems appropriate to return to the text, to reflect on its analysis of that dualistic approach to territory and to test it against more recent developments. This is also an opportunity to point up some of the ‘red flags’ around potential disciplinary shortcomings in artistic research – and to make tentative suggestions as to how these might be overcome. The essay proposes a model that emphasises the rhizomic interconnectedness of the territories of artistic research. It argues that the nature of this ‘saturated connectedness’, free from privileged or marginalised elements and continuously dynamic in its functioning, is as crucial to an understanding of artistic research as is a proper comprehension of the separate identities of the territories themselves.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-30T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
journal article
journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.34624/impar.v3i2.14146
oai:proa.ua.pt:article/14146
url https://doi.org/10.34624/impar.v3i2.14146
identifier_str_mv oai:proa.ua.pt:article/14146
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/impar/article/view/14146
https://doi.org/10.34624/impar.v3i2.14146
https://proa.ua.pt/index.php/impar/article/view/14146/9802
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UA Editora
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UA Editora
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; Vol 3 No 2 (2019): IMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; 45-59
ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; Vol. 3 Núm. 2 (2019): IMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; 45-59
ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; Vol. 3 No 2 (2019): IMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; 45-59
ÍMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; vol. 3 n.º 2 (2019): IMPAR: Online Journal for Artistic Research; 45-59
2184-1993
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1777301262959640576