Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chiquitelli Neto, M.
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Titto, M.G., Próspero, J.N., Longo, A.L., Leme-dos-Santos, T.M., Costa e Silva, E.V., Camerro, L.Z., Pereira, A.M.F
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17351
https://doi.org/10.14269/2318-1265/jabb.v3n4p101-106
Resumo: The experiment was done in the Teaching, Research and Extension Farm (FEPE - UNESP/Ilha Solteira). One hundred and twenty Guzerat cattle of different ages were used in the study: 40 mature cows, 40 yearling steers and 40 calves. Twenty animals of each category were vaccinated by rational management and the other 20 by conventional method. For calves, when they were submitted to rational management during the vaccination process, the management efficiency indicators showed lower averages, with lower time of work execution (P <0.001), repetitive introduction of the needle and bleeding at the injection site (P <0.05); as well as on the behaviors like reacting to the introduction of needle (P <0.01), body movement (P <0.001), jump up on another animal and attempting to or/jumping out of chute (P <0.05). In the category of mature cows, the rational management also resulted in lower values of vaccine losses (P <0.05), bleeding at the injection site, time of work execution and application of the vaccine in the wrong location (P <0.001), as well as some behaviors like reacting to the introduction of needle (P <0.01) and body movement (P <0.001). Similarly, the results obtained for yearling steers also showed significant differences between the two types of management used, with lowest average in the rational management on the indicators such as time of work execution and application of the vaccine in the wrong location (P <0.001), and behaviors such as body movement (P<0.01) and attempting to escape/jumping out of the chute (P <0.05). In this context, it is noted that the conventional management of vaccination possibly caused a sense of threat in animals, emphasizing fear and escape reactions, making the routine management more difficult, causing loss material and quality loss in the final product (beef), and increase the risk of accidents due to more aggressive behaviour toward the operator.
id RCAP_e3499901a2648ede5fff1213683844d5
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/17351
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.bem-estarbovinosmaneio racionalThe experiment was done in the Teaching, Research and Extension Farm (FEPE - UNESP/Ilha Solteira). One hundred and twenty Guzerat cattle of different ages were used in the study: 40 mature cows, 40 yearling steers and 40 calves. Twenty animals of each category were vaccinated by rational management and the other 20 by conventional method. For calves, when they were submitted to rational management during the vaccination process, the management efficiency indicators showed lower averages, with lower time of work execution (P <0.001), repetitive introduction of the needle and bleeding at the injection site (P <0.05); as well as on the behaviors like reacting to the introduction of needle (P <0.01), body movement (P <0.001), jump up on another animal and attempting to or/jumping out of chute (P <0.05). In the category of mature cows, the rational management also resulted in lower values of vaccine losses (P <0.05), bleeding at the injection site, time of work execution and application of the vaccine in the wrong location (P <0.001), as well as some behaviors like reacting to the introduction of needle (P <0.01) and body movement (P <0.001). Similarly, the results obtained for yearling steers also showed significant differences between the two types of management used, with lowest average in the rational management on the indicators such as time of work execution and application of the vaccine in the wrong location (P <0.001), and behaviors such as body movement (P<0.01) and attempting to escape/jumping out of the chute (P <0.05). In this context, it is noted that the conventional management of vaccination possibly caused a sense of threat in animals, emphasizing fear and escape reactions, making the routine management more difficult, causing loss material and quality loss in the final product (beef), and increase the risk of accidents due to more aggressive behaviour toward the operator.JABB2016-02-16T11:11:44Z2016-02-162015-10-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/17351http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17351https://doi.org/10.14269/2318-1265/jabb.v3n4p101-106porChiquitelli Neto, M., Titto, C.G., Própero, J.N.; Longo, A.L.; Leme-dos-Santos, T.M.; Titto, E.A., Costa e Silva, E.V., Camerro, L.Z. Pereira, A.M.F. (2015). Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work. Journal of Animal Behaviour Biometeorology, v.3, n. 4, 101-16.http://www.bibliotekevirtual.org/index.php/2013-02-07-03-02-35/2013-02-07-03-03-11/1285-jabb/v03n04/13467-manejo-racional-eleva-o-bem-estar-de-bovinos-guzera-e-melhora-a-eficiencia-do-trabalho-de-vacinacao.htmlndndndndndndndapereira@uevora.pt207Chiquitelli Neto, M.Titto, M.G.Próspero, J.N.Longo, A.L.Leme-dos-Santos, T.M.Costa e Silva, E.V.Camerro, L.Z.Pereira, A.M.Finfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:04:40Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/17351Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:09:28.648897Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.
title Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.
spellingShingle Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.
Chiquitelli Neto, M.
bem-estar
bovinos
maneio racional
title_short Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.
title_full Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.
title_fullStr Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.
title_full_unstemmed Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.
title_sort Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work.
author Chiquitelli Neto, M.
author_facet Chiquitelli Neto, M.
Titto, M.G.
Próspero, J.N.
Longo, A.L.
Leme-dos-Santos, T.M.
Costa e Silva, E.V.
Camerro, L.Z.
Pereira, A.M.F
author_role author
author2 Titto, M.G.
Próspero, J.N.
Longo, A.L.
Leme-dos-Santos, T.M.
Costa e Silva, E.V.
Camerro, L.Z.
Pereira, A.M.F
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chiquitelli Neto, M.
Titto, M.G.
Próspero, J.N.
Longo, A.L.
Leme-dos-Santos, T.M.
Costa e Silva, E.V.
Camerro, L.Z.
Pereira, A.M.F
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv bem-estar
bovinos
maneio racional
topic bem-estar
bovinos
maneio racional
description The experiment was done in the Teaching, Research and Extension Farm (FEPE - UNESP/Ilha Solteira). One hundred and twenty Guzerat cattle of different ages were used in the study: 40 mature cows, 40 yearling steers and 40 calves. Twenty animals of each category were vaccinated by rational management and the other 20 by conventional method. For calves, when they were submitted to rational management during the vaccination process, the management efficiency indicators showed lower averages, with lower time of work execution (P <0.001), repetitive introduction of the needle and bleeding at the injection site (P <0.05); as well as on the behaviors like reacting to the introduction of needle (P <0.01), body movement (P <0.001), jump up on another animal and attempting to or/jumping out of chute (P <0.05). In the category of mature cows, the rational management also resulted in lower values of vaccine losses (P <0.05), bleeding at the injection site, time of work execution and application of the vaccine in the wrong location (P <0.001), as well as some behaviors like reacting to the introduction of needle (P <0.01) and body movement (P <0.001). Similarly, the results obtained for yearling steers also showed significant differences between the two types of management used, with lowest average in the rational management on the indicators such as time of work execution and application of the vaccine in the wrong location (P <0.001), and behaviors such as body movement (P<0.01) and attempting to escape/jumping out of the chute (P <0.05). In this context, it is noted that the conventional management of vaccination possibly caused a sense of threat in animals, emphasizing fear and escape reactions, making the routine management more difficult, causing loss material and quality loss in the final product (beef), and increase the risk of accidents due to more aggressive behaviour toward the operator.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-10-01T00:00:00Z
2016-02-16T11:11:44Z
2016-02-16
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17351
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17351
https://doi.org/10.14269/2318-1265/jabb.v3n4p101-106
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/17351
https://doi.org/10.14269/2318-1265/jabb.v3n4p101-106
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Chiquitelli Neto, M., Titto, C.G., Própero, J.N.; Longo, A.L.; Leme-dos-Santos, T.M.; Titto, E.A., Costa e Silva, E.V., Camerro, L.Z. Pereira, A.M.F. (2015). Racional management raises the Guzerat cattle welfare and improve the efficiency of vaccination work. Journal of Animal Behaviour Biometeorology, v.3, n. 4, 101-16.
http://www.bibliotekevirtual.org/index.php/2013-02-07-03-02-35/2013-02-07-03-03-11/1285-jabb/v03n04/13467-manejo-racional-eleva-o-bem-estar-de-bovinos-guzera-e-melhora-a-eficiencia-do-trabalho-de-vacinacao.html
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
apereira@uevora.pt
207
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv JABB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv JABB
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799136577215004672