Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Coutada, RS
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Nogueira-Silva, C, Rocha, A
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/854
Resumo: Overview and aims: Episiotomy is one of the most common procedures in Obstetrics, despite actual scientific evidence does not support its routine practice.The aim of this study was to determine the impact of selective and routine practice of episiotomy in early maternal and neonatal outcomes. Study design:An observational, transversal, descriptive and analytic study was conducted in two public Hospitals in northern Portugal, with different policies for the practice of episiotomy: selective practice (Hospital A) and routine practice (Hospital B). Population: A non-random sampling of convenience of the whole puerperal women whose deliveries was performed in these hospitals during months of July and August 2011 was utilized. A total of 397 women was analyzed, 200 in selective group and 197 in routine group. Methods: Data was collected by consultation of medical records of the puerperal women. Comparison between hospitals was performed with the chi-square test. Results: The groups were similar for the obstetric history, demographic, biometric, pregnancy and labor characteristics. However, gestational age, weight and head circumference of newborns as well as instrumentation rate were significantly higher in selective group. Episiotomy was performed in 72.5% cases of selective group and in 88.8% of routine group (p≤0.001).There wasless perinealsuturing (p=0.001) and a greater number of intact perineum in selective group (p≤0.001), without differences in lacerations type or degree. The routine group presented more frequent early perineal complications and higher pain levels in the first postpartum day (p≤0.001). No differences were found between groups in Apgar scores, neonatal trauma and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions number. Conclusions: The selective use of episiotomy was associated with better early maternal outcomes, with no differences in neonatal morbidity. Thus, the routine practice of episiotomy showed no benefits
id RCAP_e37cb590810f01909aa5334f2624c0c3
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.hospitaldebraga.pt:10400.23/854
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine useEpisiotomia: resultados maternos e neonatais precoces do uso seletivo versus generalizadoEpisiotomiaOverview and aims: Episiotomy is one of the most common procedures in Obstetrics, despite actual scientific evidence does not support its routine practice.The aim of this study was to determine the impact of selective and routine practice of episiotomy in early maternal and neonatal outcomes. Study design:An observational, transversal, descriptive and analytic study was conducted in two public Hospitals in northern Portugal, with different policies for the practice of episiotomy: selective practice (Hospital A) and routine practice (Hospital B). Population: A non-random sampling of convenience of the whole puerperal women whose deliveries was performed in these hospitals during months of July and August 2011 was utilized. A total of 397 women was analyzed, 200 in selective group and 197 in routine group. Methods: Data was collected by consultation of medical records of the puerperal women. Comparison between hospitals was performed with the chi-square test. Results: The groups were similar for the obstetric history, demographic, biometric, pregnancy and labor characteristics. However, gestational age, weight and head circumference of newborns as well as instrumentation rate were significantly higher in selective group. Episiotomy was performed in 72.5% cases of selective group and in 88.8% of routine group (p≤0.001).There wasless perinealsuturing (p=0.001) and a greater number of intact perineum in selective group (p≤0.001), without differences in lacerations type or degree. The routine group presented more frequent early perineal complications and higher pain levels in the first postpartum day (p≤0.001). No differences were found between groups in Apgar scores, neonatal trauma and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions number. Conclusions: The selective use of episiotomy was associated with better early maternal outcomes, with no differences in neonatal morbidity. Thus, the routine practice of episiotomy showed no benefitsRepositório Científico do Hospital de BragaCoutada, RSNogueira-Silva, CRocha, A2015-03-27T14:56:17Z2014-01-01T00:00:00Z2014-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/854engActa Obstet Ginecol Port 2014;8(2):126-34info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-21T09:02:37Zoai:repositorio.hospitaldebraga.pt:10400.23/854Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:55:28.714821Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use
Episiotomia: resultados maternos e neonatais precoces do uso seletivo versus generalizado
title Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use
spellingShingle Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use
Coutada, RS
Episiotomia
title_short Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use
title_full Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use
title_fullStr Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use
title_full_unstemmed Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use
title_sort Episiotomy: early maternal and neonatal outcomes of selective versus routine use
author Coutada, RS
author_facet Coutada, RS
Nogueira-Silva, C
Rocha, A
author_role author
author2 Nogueira-Silva, C
Rocha, A
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico do Hospital de Braga
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Coutada, RS
Nogueira-Silva, C
Rocha, A
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Episiotomia
topic Episiotomia
description Overview and aims: Episiotomy is one of the most common procedures in Obstetrics, despite actual scientific evidence does not support its routine practice.The aim of this study was to determine the impact of selective and routine practice of episiotomy in early maternal and neonatal outcomes. Study design:An observational, transversal, descriptive and analytic study was conducted in two public Hospitals in northern Portugal, with different policies for the practice of episiotomy: selective practice (Hospital A) and routine practice (Hospital B). Population: A non-random sampling of convenience of the whole puerperal women whose deliveries was performed in these hospitals during months of July and August 2011 was utilized. A total of 397 women was analyzed, 200 in selective group and 197 in routine group. Methods: Data was collected by consultation of medical records of the puerperal women. Comparison between hospitals was performed with the chi-square test. Results: The groups were similar for the obstetric history, demographic, biometric, pregnancy and labor characteristics. However, gestational age, weight and head circumference of newborns as well as instrumentation rate were significantly higher in selective group. Episiotomy was performed in 72.5% cases of selective group and in 88.8% of routine group (p≤0.001).There wasless perinealsuturing (p=0.001) and a greater number of intact perineum in selective group (p≤0.001), without differences in lacerations type or degree. The routine group presented more frequent early perineal complications and higher pain levels in the first postpartum day (p≤0.001). No differences were found between groups in Apgar scores, neonatal trauma and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admissions number. Conclusions: The selective use of episiotomy was associated with better early maternal outcomes, with no differences in neonatal morbidity. Thus, the routine practice of episiotomy showed no benefits
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-01-01T00:00:00Z
2014-01-01T00:00:00Z
2015-03-27T14:56:17Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/854
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.23/854
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Acta Obstet Ginecol Port 2014;8(2):126-34
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130423147626496