THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.815 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The impact of kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutational status on surgery planning for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of type of liver surgery and margin status in recurrence free survival (RFS) of patients with CRLM, according to KRAS mutational status. Materials and methods: Retrospective review of all patients consecutively submitted to CLRM surgery between January 2011 and December 2016 with KRAS determination. Exclusion criteria were 2-stage hepatectomy strategy, loss to follow up and non-anatomical and anatomical resections performed simultaneously. Results: 114 patients were included, with a median age of 61 [31-80] years old. 67.5% of patients were male. KRAS mutation was present in 46.5% of patients, 58.8% had non-anatomical resections and R0 surgery was obtained in 69.3%. With a median follow up of 43 [4-105] months, recurrence rate was 86.8%, median overall survival and RFS were 53 and 11 months, respectively. In the mutated KRAS (mKRAS) group, the detection of R1 margins was the only predictor of worse RFS (31 versus 13 months, p=0.022). In the wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS) group a similar difference was not observed (24 versus 19 months, p=0.310). The most common form of recurrence after R1 resections in the mKRAS group was extra-hepatic, while in the wtKRAS was isolated hepatic recurrence. Conclusion: In patients with mKRAS, R1 resection was associated with a decreased RFS, mainly due to extra-hepatic recurrence. These findings were not replicated in the wtKRAS group. KRAS mutational status should be considered while planning liver resection for CRLM, namely when deciding optimal margin width. |
id |
RCAP_e49230a2af5807a25f73159fa45148aa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revista.spcir.com:article/815 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASESO IMPACTO DA MUTAÇÃO KRAS NAS METÁSTASES HEPÁTICAS DO CANCRO COLORRETAL NAS MARGENS CIRÚRGICAS E NA CIRURGIA HEPÁTICAIntroduction: The impact of kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutational status on surgery planning for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of type of liver surgery and margin status in recurrence free survival (RFS) of patients with CRLM, according to KRAS mutational status. Materials and methods: Retrospective review of all patients consecutively submitted to CLRM surgery between January 2011 and December 2016 with KRAS determination. Exclusion criteria were 2-stage hepatectomy strategy, loss to follow up and non-anatomical and anatomical resections performed simultaneously. Results: 114 patients were included, with a median age of 61 [31-80] years old. 67.5% of patients were male. KRAS mutation was present in 46.5% of patients, 58.8% had non-anatomical resections and R0 surgery was obtained in 69.3%. With a median follow up of 43 [4-105] months, recurrence rate was 86.8%, median overall survival and RFS were 53 and 11 months, respectively. In the mutated KRAS (mKRAS) group, the detection of R1 margins was the only predictor of worse RFS (31 versus 13 months, p=0.022). In the wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS) group a similar difference was not observed (24 versus 19 months, p=0.310). The most common form of recurrence after R1 resections in the mKRAS group was extra-hepatic, while in the wtKRAS was isolated hepatic recurrence. Conclusion: In patients with mKRAS, R1 resection was associated with a decreased RFS, mainly due to extra-hepatic recurrence. These findings were not replicated in the wtKRAS group. KRAS mutational status should be considered while planning liver resection for CRLM, namely when deciding optimal margin width. Introdução: O impacto do estado mutacional do kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) no planeamento da cirurgia por metastização hepática de carcinoma colorretal permanece desconhecido. O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o impacto do tipo de cirurgia hepática e do status das margens de resseção hepática na sobrevivência livre de recidiva (SLR) em doentes com metastização hepática de carcinoma colorretal, de acordo com o estado mutacional do KRAS. Material e métodos: Revisão retrospetiva de todos os doentes consecutivamente submetidos a cirurgia hepática por metastização de carcinoma colorretal entre janeiro de 2011 e dezembro de 2016, com determinação do estado mutacional do KRAS. Os critérios de exclusão foram estratégia de hepatectomia em 2 tempos, perda de seguimento e resseção anatómica e não-anatómica no mesmo tempo cirúrgico. Resultados: Foram incluídos 114 doentes na análise, com mediana de idade de 61 [31-80] anos e 67.5% de doentes do sexo masculino. KRAS mutado estava presente em 46.5% dos doentes, 58.8% realizaram uma resseção não anatómica e uma cirurgia R0 foi obtida em 69.3%. Com uma mediana de tempo de seguimento de 43 [4-105] meses, a taxa de recidiva foi de 86.8%, a mediana de sobrevivência global e de SLR foi de 53 e 11 meses, respetivamente. No grupo com KRAS mutado (mKRAS), as margens R1 foram o único fator preditor de pior SLR (31 versus 13 meses, p=0.022), o que não se verificou no grupo KRAS wild-type (wtKRAS) (24 versus 19 meses, p=0.310). A forma mais comum de recidiva após resseção R1 no grupo mKRAS foi extra-hepática, enquanto que no grupo wtKRAS foi a recidiva hepática isolada. Conclusão: Em doentes do grupo mKRAS, a resseção R1 associou-se a diminuição da SLR, sobretudo à custa de recidiva extra-hepática. Estes achados não foram replicados no grupo wtKRAS. O estado mutacional do KRAS deve ser tido em consideração aquando do planeamento da resseção hepática em doentes com metastização de carcinoma colorretal, nomeadamente na decisão da margem cirúrgica ótima. Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia2020-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.815https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.815Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 48 (2020): Number 48 - September 2020; 43-53Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 48 (2020): Number 48 - September 2020; 43-532183-11651646-6918reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/815https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/815/562Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPeyroteo, MarianaCanotilho, RitaSousa, AlexandreSousa, FernandaFernandes, ManuelGonçalves, BelarminoVideira, José FlávioFragoso, MariaLara Santos, LúcioAbreu de Sousa, Joaquim2024-03-14T22:04:57Zoai:revista.spcir.com:article/815Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T04:00:46.843658Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES O IMPACTO DA MUTAÇÃO KRAS NAS METÁSTASES HEPÁTICAS DO CANCRO COLORRETAL NAS MARGENS CIRÚRGICAS E NA CIRURGIA HEPÁTICA |
title |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES |
spellingShingle |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES Peyroteo, Mariana |
title_short |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES |
title_full |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES |
title_fullStr |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES |
title_sort |
THE IMPACT OF LIVER SURGERY AND MARGIN STATUS ON SURVIVAL ACCORDING TO KRAS MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES |
author |
Peyroteo, Mariana |
author_facet |
Peyroteo, Mariana Canotilho, Rita Sousa, Alexandre Sousa, Fernanda Fernandes, Manuel Gonçalves, Belarmino Videira, José Flávio Fragoso, Maria Lara Santos, Lúcio Abreu de Sousa, Joaquim |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Canotilho, Rita Sousa, Alexandre Sousa, Fernanda Fernandes, Manuel Gonçalves, Belarmino Videira, José Flávio Fragoso, Maria Lara Santos, Lúcio Abreu de Sousa, Joaquim |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Peyroteo, Mariana Canotilho, Rita Sousa, Alexandre Sousa, Fernanda Fernandes, Manuel Gonçalves, Belarmino Videira, José Flávio Fragoso, Maria Lara Santos, Lúcio Abreu de Sousa, Joaquim |
description |
Introduction: The impact of kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutational status on surgery planning for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of type of liver surgery and margin status in recurrence free survival (RFS) of patients with CRLM, according to KRAS mutational status. Materials and methods: Retrospective review of all patients consecutively submitted to CLRM surgery between January 2011 and December 2016 with KRAS determination. Exclusion criteria were 2-stage hepatectomy strategy, loss to follow up and non-anatomical and anatomical resections performed simultaneously. Results: 114 patients were included, with a median age of 61 [31-80] years old. 67.5% of patients were male. KRAS mutation was present in 46.5% of patients, 58.8% had non-anatomical resections and R0 surgery was obtained in 69.3%. With a median follow up of 43 [4-105] months, recurrence rate was 86.8%, median overall survival and RFS were 53 and 11 months, respectively. In the mutated KRAS (mKRAS) group, the detection of R1 margins was the only predictor of worse RFS (31 versus 13 months, p=0.022). In the wild-type KRAS (wtKRAS) group a similar difference was not observed (24 versus 19 months, p=0.310). The most common form of recurrence after R1 resections in the mKRAS group was extra-hepatic, while in the wtKRAS was isolated hepatic recurrence. Conclusion: In patients with mKRAS, R1 resection was associated with a decreased RFS, mainly due to extra-hepatic recurrence. These findings were not replicated in the wtKRAS group. KRAS mutational status should be considered while planning liver resection for CRLM, namely when deciding optimal margin width. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-30 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.815 https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.815 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.34635/rpc.815 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/815 https://revista.spcir.com/index.php/spcir/article/view/815/562 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Cirurgia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 48 (2020): Number 48 - September 2020; 43-53 Revista Portuguesa de Cirurgia; No 48 (2020): Number 48 - September 2020; 43-53 2183-1165 1646-6918 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799138182448545792 |