Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/5056 |
Resumo: | In the world of Philosophy for Children (P4C), the word “method” is found frequently in its literature and in its practitioner’s handbooks. This paper focuses on the idea of community of philosophical inquiry (CPI) as P4C’s methodological framework for educational purposes, and evaluates that framework and those purposes in light of the question, what does it mean to bring children and philosophy together, and what methodological framework, if any, is appropriate to that project? Our broader aim is to highlight a problem with regards to the concept of method in P4C, and to question the consequences of that concept in the practice of philosophical dialogue with children. To better situate the concept of method within P4C (which, we think, will help to clarify some of the dialogues and debates within P4C as a philosophical field), we will identify two different historical understandings—represented by Rene Descartes and Hans Georg Gadamer—of the concept, and suggest new possibilities for understanding philosophical practice with children in light of their difference. |
id |
RCAP_e4959583cd96bb998185765d0a61d511 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.uac.pt:10400.3/5056 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology?MethodMethodologyPhilosophy for ChildrenInquiryIn the world of Philosophy for Children (P4C), the word “method” is found frequently in its literature and in its practitioner’s handbooks. This paper focuses on the idea of community of philosophical inquiry (CPI) as P4C’s methodological framework for educational purposes, and evaluates that framework and those purposes in light of the question, what does it mean to bring children and philosophy together, and what methodological framework, if any, is appropriate to that project? Our broader aim is to highlight a problem with regards to the concept of method in P4C, and to question the consequences of that concept in the practice of philosophical dialogue with children. To better situate the concept of method within P4C (which, we think, will help to clarify some of the dialogues and debates within P4C as a philosophical field), we will identify two different historical understandings—represented by Rene Descartes and Hans Georg Gadamer—of the concept, and suggest new possibilities for understanding philosophical practice with children in light of their difference.SpringerRepositório da Universidade dos AçoresKohan, WalterCosta Carvalho, Magda2019-04-11T10:38:41Z2019-032019-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/5056engKohan, W. O.; Costa Carvalho, M. (2019). Finding Treasures: Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology, "Studies in Philosophy and Education". https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09659-y1573-191X10.1007/s11217-019-09659-ymetadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-12-20T14:33:18Zoai:repositorio.uac.pt:10400.3/5056Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:27:19.946818Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology? |
title |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology? |
spellingShingle |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology? Kohan, Walter Method Methodology Philosophy for Children Inquiry |
title_short |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology? |
title_full |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology? |
title_fullStr |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology? |
title_sort |
Finding Treasures : Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology? |
author |
Kohan, Walter |
author_facet |
Kohan, Walter Costa Carvalho, Magda |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa Carvalho, Magda |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório da Universidade dos Açores |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kohan, Walter Costa Carvalho, Magda |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Method Methodology Philosophy for Children Inquiry |
topic |
Method Methodology Philosophy for Children Inquiry |
description |
In the world of Philosophy for Children (P4C), the word “method” is found frequently in its literature and in its practitioner’s handbooks. This paper focuses on the idea of community of philosophical inquiry (CPI) as P4C’s methodological framework for educational purposes, and evaluates that framework and those purposes in light of the question, what does it mean to bring children and philosophy together, and what methodological framework, if any, is appropriate to that project? Our broader aim is to highlight a problem with regards to the concept of method in P4C, and to question the consequences of that concept in the practice of philosophical dialogue with children. To better situate the concept of method within P4C (which, we think, will help to clarify some of the dialogues and debates within P4C as a philosophical field), we will identify two different historical understandings—represented by Rene Descartes and Hans Georg Gadamer—of the concept, and suggest new possibilities for understanding philosophical practice with children in light of their difference. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-11T10:38:41Z 2019-03 2019-03-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/5056 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.3/5056 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Kohan, W. O.; Costa Carvalho, M. (2019). Finding Treasures: Is the Community of Philosophical Inquiry a Methodology, "Studies in Philosophy and Education". https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-019-09659-y 1573-191X 10.1007/s11217-019-09659-y |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130728285339648 |