Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135 |
Resumo: | Introduction: In Portugal, health literacy has started to be addressed through national policies, but research on the topic is still scarce. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of limited health literacy in Portugal using an existing health literacy instrument, the Newest Vital Sign.Materials and Methods: Following cross-cultural adaptation of the instrument, a sample of 249 participants was evaluated to assess reliability and construct validity of the Newest Vital Sign; the latter was tested assuming physicians would score highest, followed by health researchers, then by engineering researchers and finally by laypersons from the general population. We applied this validated version in a representative sample of 1544 Portuguese-speaking residents in Portugal aged between 16 and 79 years and quantified the associations between limited health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics.Results: The instrument showed high reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.85). Health-related occupation showed association with higher scores in the Newest Vital Sign (p trend < 0.001). The prevalence of limited health literacy in the Portuguese population was 72.9% (95% CI: 69.4 - 76.4). We found no differences between men and women, but persons with limited health literacy were significantly older (p < 0.001) and less educated (p < 0.001).Discussion: The burden of limited health literacy in Portugal is higher than that in other European countries. It should drive a universal precautions approach to health communication at all levels of the health system.Conclusion: We validated a brief and simple instrument and estimated the prevalence of limited health literacy in the literate Portuguese population at roughly three out of four people. |
id |
RCAP_e55faa51defa08b5f7d81468877e5246 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9135 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital SignPrevalência de Literacia em Saúde Inadequada em Portugal Medida com o Newest Vital SignHealth LiteracyPortugalPrevalenceValidation StudiesEstudos de ValidaçãoLiteracia em SaúdePortugalPrevalênciaIntroduction: In Portugal, health literacy has started to be addressed through national policies, but research on the topic is still scarce. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of limited health literacy in Portugal using an existing health literacy instrument, the Newest Vital Sign.Materials and Methods: Following cross-cultural adaptation of the instrument, a sample of 249 participants was evaluated to assess reliability and construct validity of the Newest Vital Sign; the latter was tested assuming physicians would score highest, followed by health researchers, then by engineering researchers and finally by laypersons from the general population. We applied this validated version in a representative sample of 1544 Portuguese-speaking residents in Portugal aged between 16 and 79 years and quantified the associations between limited health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics.Results: The instrument showed high reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.85). Health-related occupation showed association with higher scores in the Newest Vital Sign (p trend < 0.001). The prevalence of limited health literacy in the Portuguese population was 72.9% (95% CI: 69.4 - 76.4). We found no differences between men and women, but persons with limited health literacy were significantly older (p < 0.001) and less educated (p < 0.001).Discussion: The burden of limited health literacy in Portugal is higher than that in other European countries. It should drive a universal precautions approach to health communication at all levels of the health system.Conclusion: We validated a brief and simple instrument and estimated the prevalence of limited health literacy in the literate Portuguese population at roughly three out of four people.Introdução: A literacia em saúde começa a ser alvo de políticas de saúde em Portugal, mas a investigação neste tema ainda é escassa. Pretendemos estimar a prevalência de literacia em saúde inadequada e os fatores sociodemográficos associados em Portugal, utilizando um instrumento de avaliação da literacia em saúde já existente, o Newest Vital Sign.Material e Métodos: Após adaptação transcultural do instrumento, avaliámos uma amostra de 249 participantes para examinar fiabilidade e validade de constructo do Newest Vital Sign; esta última foi testada assumindo que os médicos teriam pontuação máxima, seguidos por investigadores na área da saúde, investigadores na área da engenharia e finalmente por leigos da população geral. Em seguida, aplicámos a versão validada numa amostra representativa de 1554 pessoas, residentes em Portugal, entre os 16 e os 79 anos, e quantificámos as associações entre literacia em saúde inadequada e caraterísticas sociodemográficas.Resultados: O instrumento revelou elevada fiabilidade (α de Cronbach = 0,85). A profissão ligada à saúde associou-se a pontuações mais elevadas no Newest Vital Sign (p para a tendência < 0,001). A prevalência de literacia em saúde inadequada na população portuguesa foi de 72,9% (IC 95%: 69,4 - 76,4). Não encontrámos diferenças entre homens e mulheres, mas as pessoas com literacia em saúde inadequada eram significativamente mais velhas (p < 0,001) e com menor escolaridade (p < 0,001).Discussão: A carga de literacia em saúde inadequada em Portugal é mais alta do que a observada noutros países europeus. Esta deve conduzir a medidas de precaução universais no âmbito da comunicação em saúde, a todos os níveis de cuidados.Conclusão: Adaptámos um instrumento breve e simples e estimámos que, na população portuguesa alfabetizada, três em cada quatro pessoas possuem literacia em saúde inadequada.Ordem dos Médicos2017-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9135Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 12 (2017): December; 861-869Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 12 (2017): Dezembro; 861-8691646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/5257https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/5253https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/5254https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9331https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9332https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9333https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9500https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9610https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9611https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9612https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9613https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9614Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaiva, DagmaraSilva, SusanaSevero, MiltonMoura-Ferreira, PedroLunet, NunoAzevedo, Ana2022-12-20T11:05:42Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9135Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:41.112831Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign Prevalência de Literacia em Saúde Inadequada em Portugal Medida com o Newest Vital Sign |
title |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign |
spellingShingle |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign Paiva, Dagmara Health Literacy Portugal Prevalence Validation Studies Estudos de Validação Literacia em Saúde Portugal Prevalência |
title_short |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign |
title_full |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign |
title_fullStr |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign |
title_full_unstemmed |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign |
title_sort |
Limited Health Literacy in Portugal Assessed with the Newest Vital Sign |
author |
Paiva, Dagmara |
author_facet |
Paiva, Dagmara Silva, Susana Severo, Milton Moura-Ferreira, Pedro Lunet, Nuno Azevedo, Ana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Susana Severo, Milton Moura-Ferreira, Pedro Lunet, Nuno Azevedo, Ana |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paiva, Dagmara Silva, Susana Severo, Milton Moura-Ferreira, Pedro Lunet, Nuno Azevedo, Ana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Literacy Portugal Prevalence Validation Studies Estudos de Validação Literacia em Saúde Portugal Prevalência |
topic |
Health Literacy Portugal Prevalence Validation Studies Estudos de Validação Literacia em Saúde Portugal Prevalência |
description |
Introduction: In Portugal, health literacy has started to be addressed through national policies, but research on the topic is still scarce. We aimed to estimate the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of limited health literacy in Portugal using an existing health literacy instrument, the Newest Vital Sign.Materials and Methods: Following cross-cultural adaptation of the instrument, a sample of 249 participants was evaluated to assess reliability and construct validity of the Newest Vital Sign; the latter was tested assuming physicians would score highest, followed by health researchers, then by engineering researchers and finally by laypersons from the general population. We applied this validated version in a representative sample of 1544 Portuguese-speaking residents in Portugal aged between 16 and 79 years and quantified the associations between limited health literacy and sociodemographic characteristics.Results: The instrument showed high reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.85). Health-related occupation showed association with higher scores in the Newest Vital Sign (p trend < 0.001). The prevalence of limited health literacy in the Portuguese population was 72.9% (95% CI: 69.4 - 76.4). We found no differences between men and women, but persons with limited health literacy were significantly older (p < 0.001) and less educated (p < 0.001).Discussion: The burden of limited health literacy in Portugal is higher than that in other European countries. It should drive a universal precautions approach to health communication at all levels of the health system.Conclusion: We validated a brief and simple instrument and estimated the prevalence of limited health literacy in the literate Portuguese population at roughly three out of four people. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-29 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9135 |
url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/9135 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/5257 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/5253 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/5254 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9331 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9332 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9333 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9500 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9610 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9611 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9612 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9613 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/9135/9614 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2017 Acta Médica Portuguesa |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 No. 12 (2017): December; 861-869 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 30 N.º 12 (2017): Dezembro; 861-869 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130647487315968 |