Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/7631 |
Resumo: | In the literature on morality issues, the most famous typology distinguishes countries from the “religious” and “secular” worlds, based on the presence or absence of partisan religious cleavages. Portugal belongs to the former world, yet in 2018, the Portuguese Parliament passed a law on the self-determination of gender identity. This article asks how such an outcome was possible, focusing on the role of political parties and civil society actors within advocacy coalitions. Our analysis reveals that, in addition to the role played by civil society actors, the “change coalition” won the dispute because it assembled a majority of votes in the parliament from left-wing progressive political parties. Moreover, actors from the “change coalition” developed a clear strategy of articulation before and during the debate. In contrast, the “blocking coalition,” composed of right-wing political parties and a few health-related actors, failed to define a coherent advocacy strategy. |
id |
RCAP_e701ce13a8e5f882535adc8e3538db21 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/7631 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issuesIn the literature on morality issues, the most famous typology distinguishes countries from the “religious” and “secular” worlds, based on the presence or absence of partisan religious cleavages. Portugal belongs to the former world, yet in 2018, the Portuguese Parliament passed a law on the self-determination of gender identity. This article asks how such an outcome was possible, focusing on the role of political parties and civil society actors within advocacy coalitions. Our analysis reveals that, in addition to the role played by civil society actors, the “change coalition” won the dispute because it assembled a majority of votes in the parliament from left-wing progressive political parties. Moreover, actors from the “change coalition” developed a clear strategy of articulation before and during the debate. In contrast, the “blocking coalition,” composed of right-wing political parties and a few health-related actors, failed to define a coherent advocacy strategy.Oxford University PressIC-OnlineMota, Luis F.Fernandes, Bruna2022-09-07T15:16:08Z20222022-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/7631engLuís F Mota, Bruna Fernandes, Debating the Law of Self-Determination of Gender Identity in Portugal: Composition and Dynamics of Advocacy Coalitions of Political and Civil Society Actors in the Discussion of Morality Issues, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 29, Issue 1, Spring 2022, Pages 50–70, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab0151072-474510.1093/sp/jxab015metadata only accessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-09-26T18:22:38Zoai:iconline.ipleiria.pt:10400.8/7631Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-09-26T18:22:38Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues |
title |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues |
spellingShingle |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues Mota, Luis F. |
title_short |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues |
title_full |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues |
title_fullStr |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues |
title_full_unstemmed |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues |
title_sort |
Debating the law of self-determination of gender identity in Portugal: Composition and dynamics of advocacy coalitions of political and civil society actors in the discussion of morality issues |
author |
Mota, Luis F. |
author_facet |
Mota, Luis F. Fernandes, Bruna |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernandes, Bruna |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
IC-Online |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mota, Luis F. Fernandes, Bruna |
description |
In the literature on morality issues, the most famous typology distinguishes countries from the “religious” and “secular” worlds, based on the presence or absence of partisan religious cleavages. Portugal belongs to the former world, yet in 2018, the Portuguese Parliament passed a law on the self-determination of gender identity. This article asks how such an outcome was possible, focusing on the role of political parties and civil society actors within advocacy coalitions. Our analysis reveals that, in addition to the role played by civil society actors, the “change coalition” won the dispute because it assembled a majority of votes in the parliament from left-wing progressive political parties. Moreover, actors from the “change coalition” developed a clear strategy of articulation before and during the debate. In contrast, the “blocking coalition,” composed of right-wing political parties and a few health-related actors, failed to define a coherent advocacy strategy. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-09-07T15:16:08Z 2022 2022-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/7631 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.8/7631 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Luís F Mota, Bruna Fernandes, Debating the Law of Self-Determination of Gender Identity in Portugal: Composition and Dynamics of Advocacy Coalitions of Political and Civil Society Actors in the Discussion of Morality Issues, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 29, Issue 1, Spring 2022, Pages 50–70, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxab015 1072-4745 10.1093/sp/jxab015 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
metadata only access info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
metadata only access |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Oxford University Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817547280492789761 |