Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rato, Margarida
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Costin, Adelina, Furtado, Constança, Sousa, Cristina, Toscano, Cristina, Veríssimo, Cristina, Trindade, Felicidade, Tavares Almeida, Filipa, da Cunha Velho, Glória, Catorze, Goreti, Raposo, Inês, Selada, Joana, A Ferreira, João, Batista, Judite, Santos, Luis, Sereijo, Manuel, Silva, Manuela, Apetato, Margarida, Sanches, Maria, Costa-Silva, Miguel, L Filipe, Paulo, Santos, Paulo, D. Fonseca, Pedro, Mascarenhas, Rosa, Bajanca, Rui, Lopes, Virginia, Lewis, Viviana, Duarte, Maria da Luz, Galhardas, Célia, Anes, Margarida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910
Resumo: Introduction: Superficial fungal infections are the most frequent infectious dermatoses and their incidence continues to increase. Dermatophytes are the principal agents presenting, however, a variable geographic distribution.Material and Methods: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of superficial fungal infections diagnosed in Dermatology departments/ units of the Portuguese National Health System between January 2014 and December 2016, through a retrospective analysis of the results of positive cultures performed during this period.Results: A total of 2375 isolates from 2319 patients were studied. The most frequently isolated dermatophyte was Trichophyton rubrum (53.6%), which was also the main cause of glabrous skin tinea (52.4%) and of onychomycosis (51.1%). In relation to tinea capitis, Microsporum audouinii was the most prevalent agent globally (42.6%), followed by Trichophyton soudanense (22.1%). While in the Lisbon metropolitan area these dermatophytes were the main causative agents, in the North and Center regions of Portugal, Microsporum canis was the most frequent agent (58.5%). Yeasts were the main agents isolated from onychomycosis of the hands (76.7%).Conclusion: The results of this study are globally in agreement with the scientific literature. Trichophyton rubrum is the most frequent dermatophyte overall. As for tinea capitis, in the Lisbon metropolitan area, the imported anthropophilic species assume particular importance.
id RCAP_e725a47abcf231d85c8ce4e97afd29ab
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)Epidemiologia das infeções fúngicas superficiais em Portugal - revisão de 3 anos (2014-2016)Dermatomycoses/epidemiologyFungiMycoses/epidemiologyPortugalDermatomicoses/epidemiologiaFungosMicoses/epidemiologiaPortugalIntroduction: Superficial fungal infections are the most frequent infectious dermatoses and their incidence continues to increase. Dermatophytes are the principal agents presenting, however, a variable geographic distribution.Material and Methods: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of superficial fungal infections diagnosed in Dermatology departments/ units of the Portuguese National Health System between January 2014 and December 2016, through a retrospective analysis of the results of positive cultures performed during this period.Results: A total of 2375 isolates from 2319 patients were studied. The most frequently isolated dermatophyte was Trichophyton rubrum (53.6%), which was also the main cause of glabrous skin tinea (52.4%) and of onychomycosis (51.1%). In relation to tinea capitis, Microsporum audouinii was the most prevalent agent globally (42.6%), followed by Trichophyton soudanense (22.1%). While in the Lisbon metropolitan area these dermatophytes were the main causative agents, in the North and Center regions of Portugal, Microsporum canis was the most frequent agent (58.5%). Yeasts were the main agents isolated from onychomycosis of the hands (76.7%).Conclusion: The results of this study are globally in agreement with the scientific literature. Trichophyton rubrum is the most frequent dermatophyte overall. As for tinea capitis, in the Lisbon metropolitan area, the imported anthropophilic species assume particular importance.Introdução: As infeções fúngicas superficiais são as dermatoses infeciosas mais frequentes e a sua incidência continua a aumentar. Os dermatófitos são os principais agentes causais apresentando, contudo, uma distribuição geográfica variável.Material e Métodos: O presente estudo teve como objetivo a caracterização epidemiológica das infeções fúngicas superficiais diagnosticadas nos Serviços/Unidades de Dermatologia pertencentes ao Serviço Nacional de Saúde Português entre janeiro de 2014 e dezembro 2016 através da análise retrospetiva dos resultados das culturas realizadas durante esse período.Resultados: Foram estudados 2375 isolamentos, pertencentes a 2319 doentes. O dermatófito mais frequentemente isolado foi o Trichophyton rubrum (53,6%), tendo sido o principal agente causal da tinha da pele glabra (52,4%) e das onicomicoses (51,1%). Relativamente às tinhas do couro cabeludo, globalmente o Microsporum audouinii foi o agente mais prevalente (42,6%), seguido do Trichophyton soudanense (22,1%). Enquanto na área metropolitana de Lisboa estes dermatófitos foram os principais agentes de tinha do couro cabeludo, nas regiões Norte e Centro o agente mais frequente foi o Microsporum canis (58,5%). Os fungos leveduriformes foram os principais responsáveis pelas onicomicoses das mãos (76,7%).Conclusão: Os resultados deste estudo estão globalmente concordantes com a literatura científica. O Trichophyton rubrum apresenta-se como o dermatófito mais frequentemente isolado em cultura. Na tinha do couro cabeludo, na área metropolitana de Lisboa, as espécies antropofílicas de importação assumem particular destaque.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2018-10-05T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 76 No 3 (2018): July - September; 269-278Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 76 n. 3 (2018): Julho - Setembro; 269-2782182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/910https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/910/582Rato, MargaridaCostin, AdelinaFurtado, ConstançaSousa, CristinaToscano, CristinaVeríssimo, CristinaTrindade, FelicidadeTavares Almeida, Filipada Cunha Velho, GlóriaCatorze, GoretiRaposo, InêsSelada, JoanaA Ferreira, JoãoBatista, JuditeSantos, LuisSereijo, ManuelSilva, ManuelaApetato, MargaridaSanches, MariaCosta-Silva, MiguelL Filipe, PauloSantos, PauloD. Fonseca, PedroMascarenhas, RosaBajanca, RuiLopes, VirginiaLewis, VivianaDuarte, Maria da LuzGalhardas, CéliaAnes, Margaridainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-10-06T12:35:07Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:06.717513Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
Epidemiologia das infeções fúngicas superficiais em Portugal - revisão de 3 anos (2014-2016)
title Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
spellingShingle Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
Rato, Margarida
Dermatomycoses/epidemiology
Fungi
Mycoses/epidemiology
Portugal
Dermatomicoses/epidemiologia
Fungos
Micoses/epidemiologia
Portugal
title_short Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
title_full Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
title_fullStr Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
title_sort Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
author Rato, Margarida
author_facet Rato, Margarida
Costin, Adelina
Furtado, Constança
Sousa, Cristina
Toscano, Cristina
Veríssimo, Cristina
Trindade, Felicidade
Tavares Almeida, Filipa
da Cunha Velho, Glória
Catorze, Goreti
Raposo, Inês
Selada, Joana
A Ferreira, João
Batista, Judite
Santos, Luis
Sereijo, Manuel
Silva, Manuela
Apetato, Margarida
Sanches, Maria
Costa-Silva, Miguel
L Filipe, Paulo
Santos, Paulo
D. Fonseca, Pedro
Mascarenhas, Rosa
Bajanca, Rui
Lopes, Virginia
Lewis, Viviana
Duarte, Maria da Luz
Galhardas, Célia
Anes, Margarida
author_role author
author2 Costin, Adelina
Furtado, Constança
Sousa, Cristina
Toscano, Cristina
Veríssimo, Cristina
Trindade, Felicidade
Tavares Almeida, Filipa
da Cunha Velho, Glória
Catorze, Goreti
Raposo, Inês
Selada, Joana
A Ferreira, João
Batista, Judite
Santos, Luis
Sereijo, Manuel
Silva, Manuela
Apetato, Margarida
Sanches, Maria
Costa-Silva, Miguel
L Filipe, Paulo
Santos, Paulo
D. Fonseca, Pedro
Mascarenhas, Rosa
Bajanca, Rui
Lopes, Virginia
Lewis, Viviana
Duarte, Maria da Luz
Galhardas, Célia
Anes, Margarida
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rato, Margarida
Costin, Adelina
Furtado, Constança
Sousa, Cristina
Toscano, Cristina
Veríssimo, Cristina
Trindade, Felicidade
Tavares Almeida, Filipa
da Cunha Velho, Glória
Catorze, Goreti
Raposo, Inês
Selada, Joana
A Ferreira, João
Batista, Judite
Santos, Luis
Sereijo, Manuel
Silva, Manuela
Apetato, Margarida
Sanches, Maria
Costa-Silva, Miguel
L Filipe, Paulo
Santos, Paulo
D. Fonseca, Pedro
Mascarenhas, Rosa
Bajanca, Rui
Lopes, Virginia
Lewis, Viviana
Duarte, Maria da Luz
Galhardas, Célia
Anes, Margarida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dermatomycoses/epidemiology
Fungi
Mycoses/epidemiology
Portugal
Dermatomicoses/epidemiologia
Fungos
Micoses/epidemiologia
Portugal
topic Dermatomycoses/epidemiology
Fungi
Mycoses/epidemiology
Portugal
Dermatomicoses/epidemiologia
Fungos
Micoses/epidemiologia
Portugal
description Introduction: Superficial fungal infections are the most frequent infectious dermatoses and their incidence continues to increase. Dermatophytes are the principal agents presenting, however, a variable geographic distribution.Material and Methods: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of superficial fungal infections diagnosed in Dermatology departments/ units of the Portuguese National Health System between January 2014 and December 2016, through a retrospective analysis of the results of positive cultures performed during this period.Results: A total of 2375 isolates from 2319 patients were studied. The most frequently isolated dermatophyte was Trichophyton rubrum (53.6%), which was also the main cause of glabrous skin tinea (52.4%) and of onychomycosis (51.1%). In relation to tinea capitis, Microsporum audouinii was the most prevalent agent globally (42.6%), followed by Trichophyton soudanense (22.1%). While in the Lisbon metropolitan area these dermatophytes were the main causative agents, in the North and Center regions of Portugal, Microsporum canis was the most frequent agent (58.5%). Yeasts were the main agents isolated from onychomycosis of the hands (76.7%).Conclusion: The results of this study are globally in agreement with the scientific literature. Trichophyton rubrum is the most frequent dermatophyte overall. As for tinea capitis, in the Lisbon metropolitan area, the imported anthropophilic species assume particular importance.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-05T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv journal article
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910
url https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/910
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/910/582
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 76 No 3 (2018): July - September; 269-278
Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 76 n. 3 (2018): Julho - Setembro; 269-278
2182-2409
2182-2395
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130566823510016