Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Superficial fungal infections are the most frequent infectious dermatoses and their incidence continues to increase. Dermatophytes are the principal agents presenting, however, a variable geographic distribution.Material and Methods: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of superficial fungal infections diagnosed in Dermatology departments/ units of the Portuguese National Health System between January 2014 and December 2016, through a retrospective analysis of the results of positive cultures performed during this period.Results: A total of 2375 isolates from 2319 patients were studied. The most frequently isolated dermatophyte was Trichophyton rubrum (53.6%), which was also the main cause of glabrous skin tinea (52.4%) and of onychomycosis (51.1%). In relation to tinea capitis, Microsporum audouinii was the most prevalent agent globally (42.6%), followed by Trichophyton soudanense (22.1%). While in the Lisbon metropolitan area these dermatophytes were the main causative agents, in the North and Center regions of Portugal, Microsporum canis was the most frequent agent (58.5%). Yeasts were the main agents isolated from onychomycosis of the hands (76.7%).Conclusion: The results of this study are globally in agreement with the scientific literature. Trichophyton rubrum is the most frequent dermatophyte overall. As for tinea capitis, in the Lisbon metropolitan area, the imported anthropophilic species assume particular importance. |
id |
RCAP_e725a47abcf231d85c8ce4e97afd29ab |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016)Epidemiologia das infeções fúngicas superficiais em Portugal - revisão de 3 anos (2014-2016)Dermatomycoses/epidemiologyFungiMycoses/epidemiologyPortugalDermatomicoses/epidemiologiaFungosMicoses/epidemiologiaPortugalIntroduction: Superficial fungal infections are the most frequent infectious dermatoses and their incidence continues to increase. Dermatophytes are the principal agents presenting, however, a variable geographic distribution.Material and Methods: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of superficial fungal infections diagnosed in Dermatology departments/ units of the Portuguese National Health System between January 2014 and December 2016, through a retrospective analysis of the results of positive cultures performed during this period.Results: A total of 2375 isolates from 2319 patients were studied. The most frequently isolated dermatophyte was Trichophyton rubrum (53.6%), which was also the main cause of glabrous skin tinea (52.4%) and of onychomycosis (51.1%). In relation to tinea capitis, Microsporum audouinii was the most prevalent agent globally (42.6%), followed by Trichophyton soudanense (22.1%). While in the Lisbon metropolitan area these dermatophytes were the main causative agents, in the North and Center regions of Portugal, Microsporum canis was the most frequent agent (58.5%). Yeasts were the main agents isolated from onychomycosis of the hands (76.7%).Conclusion: The results of this study are globally in agreement with the scientific literature. Trichophyton rubrum is the most frequent dermatophyte overall. As for tinea capitis, in the Lisbon metropolitan area, the imported anthropophilic species assume particular importance.Introdução: As infeções fúngicas superficiais são as dermatoses infeciosas mais frequentes e a sua incidência continua a aumentar. Os dermatófitos são os principais agentes causais apresentando, contudo, uma distribuição geográfica variável.Material e Métodos: O presente estudo teve como objetivo a caracterização epidemiológica das infeções fúngicas superficiais diagnosticadas nos Serviços/Unidades de Dermatologia pertencentes ao Serviço Nacional de Saúde Português entre janeiro de 2014 e dezembro 2016 através da análise retrospetiva dos resultados das culturas realizadas durante esse período.Resultados: Foram estudados 2375 isolamentos, pertencentes a 2319 doentes. O dermatófito mais frequentemente isolado foi o Trichophyton rubrum (53,6%), tendo sido o principal agente causal da tinha da pele glabra (52,4%) e das onicomicoses (51,1%). Relativamente às tinhas do couro cabeludo, globalmente o Microsporum audouinii foi o agente mais prevalente (42,6%), seguido do Trichophyton soudanense (22,1%). Enquanto na área metropolitana de Lisboa estes dermatófitos foram os principais agentes de tinha do couro cabeludo, nas regiões Norte e Centro o agente mais frequente foi o Microsporum canis (58,5%). Os fungos leveduriformes foram os principais responsáveis pelas onicomicoses das mãos (76,7%).Conclusão: Os resultados deste estudo estão globalmente concordantes com a literatura científica. O Trichophyton rubrum apresenta-se como o dermatófito mais frequentemente isolado em cultura. Na tinha do couro cabeludo, na área metropolitana de Lisboa, as espécies antropofílicas de importação assumem particular destaque.Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia2018-10-05T00:00:00Zjournal articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 76 No 3 (2018): July - September; 269-278Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 76 n. 3 (2018): Julho - Setembro; 269-2782182-24092182-2395reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/910https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/910/582Rato, MargaridaCostin, AdelinaFurtado, ConstançaSousa, CristinaToscano, CristinaVeríssimo, CristinaTrindade, FelicidadeTavares Almeida, Filipada Cunha Velho, GlóriaCatorze, GoretiRaposo, InêsSelada, JoanaA Ferreira, JoãoBatista, JuditeSantos, LuisSereijo, ManuelSilva, ManuelaApetato, MargaridaSanches, MariaCosta-Silva, MiguelL Filipe, PauloSantos, PauloD. Fonseca, PedroMascarenhas, RosaBajanca, RuiLopes, VirginiaLewis, VivianaDuarte, Maria da LuzGalhardas, CéliaAnes, Margaridainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-10-06T12:35:07Zoai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:11:06.717513Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016) Epidemiologia das infeções fúngicas superficiais em Portugal - revisão de 3 anos (2014-2016) |
title |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016) |
spellingShingle |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016) Rato, Margarida Dermatomycoses/epidemiology Fungi Mycoses/epidemiology Portugal Dermatomicoses/epidemiologia Fungos Micoses/epidemiologia Portugal |
title_short |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016) |
title_full |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016) |
title_fullStr |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016) |
title_sort |
Epidemiology of Superficial Fungal Infections in Portugal: 3-Year Review (2014-2016) |
author |
Rato, Margarida |
author_facet |
Rato, Margarida Costin, Adelina Furtado, Constança Sousa, Cristina Toscano, Cristina Veríssimo, Cristina Trindade, Felicidade Tavares Almeida, Filipa da Cunha Velho, Glória Catorze, Goreti Raposo, Inês Selada, Joana A Ferreira, João Batista, Judite Santos, Luis Sereijo, Manuel Silva, Manuela Apetato, Margarida Sanches, Maria Costa-Silva, Miguel L Filipe, Paulo Santos, Paulo D. Fonseca, Pedro Mascarenhas, Rosa Bajanca, Rui Lopes, Virginia Lewis, Viviana Duarte, Maria da Luz Galhardas, Célia Anes, Margarida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costin, Adelina Furtado, Constança Sousa, Cristina Toscano, Cristina Veríssimo, Cristina Trindade, Felicidade Tavares Almeida, Filipa da Cunha Velho, Glória Catorze, Goreti Raposo, Inês Selada, Joana A Ferreira, João Batista, Judite Santos, Luis Sereijo, Manuel Silva, Manuela Apetato, Margarida Sanches, Maria Costa-Silva, Miguel L Filipe, Paulo Santos, Paulo D. Fonseca, Pedro Mascarenhas, Rosa Bajanca, Rui Lopes, Virginia Lewis, Viviana Duarte, Maria da Luz Galhardas, Célia Anes, Margarida |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rato, Margarida Costin, Adelina Furtado, Constança Sousa, Cristina Toscano, Cristina Veríssimo, Cristina Trindade, Felicidade Tavares Almeida, Filipa da Cunha Velho, Glória Catorze, Goreti Raposo, Inês Selada, Joana A Ferreira, João Batista, Judite Santos, Luis Sereijo, Manuel Silva, Manuela Apetato, Margarida Sanches, Maria Costa-Silva, Miguel L Filipe, Paulo Santos, Paulo D. Fonseca, Pedro Mascarenhas, Rosa Bajanca, Rui Lopes, Virginia Lewis, Viviana Duarte, Maria da Luz Galhardas, Célia Anes, Margarida |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dermatomycoses/epidemiology Fungi Mycoses/epidemiology Portugal Dermatomicoses/epidemiologia Fungos Micoses/epidemiologia Portugal |
topic |
Dermatomycoses/epidemiology Fungi Mycoses/epidemiology Portugal Dermatomicoses/epidemiologia Fungos Micoses/epidemiologia Portugal |
description |
Introduction: Superficial fungal infections are the most frequent infectious dermatoses and their incidence continues to increase. Dermatophytes are the principal agents presenting, however, a variable geographic distribution.Material and Methods: This study aimed to characterize the epidemiology of superficial fungal infections diagnosed in Dermatology departments/ units of the Portuguese National Health System between January 2014 and December 2016, through a retrospective analysis of the results of positive cultures performed during this period.Results: A total of 2375 isolates from 2319 patients were studied. The most frequently isolated dermatophyte was Trichophyton rubrum (53.6%), which was also the main cause of glabrous skin tinea (52.4%) and of onychomycosis (51.1%). In relation to tinea capitis, Microsporum audouinii was the most prevalent agent globally (42.6%), followed by Trichophyton soudanense (22.1%). While in the Lisbon metropolitan area these dermatophytes were the main causative agents, in the North and Center regions of Portugal, Microsporum canis was the most frequent agent (58.5%). Yeasts were the main agents isolated from onychomycosis of the hands (76.7%).Conclusion: The results of this study are globally in agreement with the scientific literature. Trichophyton rubrum is the most frequent dermatophyte overall. As for tinea capitis, in the Lisbon metropolitan area, the imported anthropophilic species assume particular importance. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-05T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
journal article info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910 oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910 |
identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.revista.spdv.com.pt:article/910 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/910 https://doi.org/10.29021/spdv.76.3.910 https://revista.spdv.com.pt/index.php/spdv/article/view/910/582 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of the Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology; Vol 76 No 3 (2018): July - September; 269-278 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Dermatologia e Venereologia; v. 76 n. 3 (2018): Julho - Setembro; 269-278 2182-2409 2182-2395 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130566823510016 |