Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Entradas, M.
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Bauer, M. W.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22168
Summary: Studies on scientists’ practices of public engagement have pointed to variations between disciplines. If variations at the individual level are reflected at the institutional level, then research institutes in Social Sciences (and Humanities) should perform higher in public engagement and be more involved in dialogue with the public. Using a nearly complete sample of research institutes in Portugal 2014 (n?=?234, 61% response rate), we investigate how public engagement varies in intensity, type of activities and target audiences across scientific areas. Three benchmark findings emerge. First, the Social Sciences and the Humanities profile differently in public engagement highlighting the importance of distinguishing between these two scientific areas often conflated in public engagement studies. Second, the Social Sciences overall perform more public engagement activities, but the Natural Sciences mobilise more effort for public engagement. Third, while the Social Sciences play a greater role in civic public engagement, the Natural Sciences are more likely to perform educational activities. Finally, this study shows that the overall size of research institutes, available public engagement funding and public engagement staffing make a difference in institutes’ public engagement.
id RCAP_e82633188de8e97eb02e2755876c3d68
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22168
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutesMobilisationOutreachPerformancePublic engagementResearch institutesScience communicationStudies on scientists’ practices of public engagement have pointed to variations between disciplines. If variations at the individual level are reflected at the institutional level, then research institutes in Social Sciences (and Humanities) should perform higher in public engagement and be more involved in dialogue with the public. Using a nearly complete sample of research institutes in Portugal 2014 (n?=?234, 61% response rate), we investigate how public engagement varies in intensity, type of activities and target audiences across scientific areas. Three benchmark findings emerge. First, the Social Sciences and the Humanities profile differently in public engagement highlighting the importance of distinguishing between these two scientific areas often conflated in public engagement studies. Second, the Social Sciences overall perform more public engagement activities, but the Natural Sciences mobilise more effort for public engagement. Third, while the Social Sciences play a greater role in civic public engagement, the Natural Sciences are more likely to perform educational activities. Finally, this study shows that the overall size of research institutes, available public engagement funding and public engagement staffing make a difference in institutes’ public engagement.SAGE Publications Ltd2021-02-23T17:56:26Z2017-01-01T00:00:00Z20172021-02-23T17:55:04Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/22168eng0963-662510.1177/0963662516633834Entradas, M.Bauer, M. W.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T17:50:45Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/22168Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:25:04.973755Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes
title Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes
spellingShingle Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes
Entradas, M.
Mobilisation
Outreach
Performance
Public engagement
Research institutes
Science communication
title_short Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes
title_full Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes
title_fullStr Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes
title_full_unstemmed Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes
title_sort Mobilisation for public engagement: benchmarking the practices of research institutes
author Entradas, M.
author_facet Entradas, M.
Bauer, M. W.
author_role author
author2 Bauer, M. W.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Entradas, M.
Bauer, M. W.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mobilisation
Outreach
Performance
Public engagement
Research institutes
Science communication
topic Mobilisation
Outreach
Performance
Public engagement
Research institutes
Science communication
description Studies on scientists’ practices of public engagement have pointed to variations between disciplines. If variations at the individual level are reflected at the institutional level, then research institutes in Social Sciences (and Humanities) should perform higher in public engagement and be more involved in dialogue with the public. Using a nearly complete sample of research institutes in Portugal 2014 (n?=?234, 61% response rate), we investigate how public engagement varies in intensity, type of activities and target audiences across scientific areas. Three benchmark findings emerge. First, the Social Sciences and the Humanities profile differently in public engagement highlighting the importance of distinguishing between these two scientific areas often conflated in public engagement studies. Second, the Social Sciences overall perform more public engagement activities, but the Natural Sciences mobilise more effort for public engagement. Third, while the Social Sciences play a greater role in civic public engagement, the Natural Sciences are more likely to perform educational activities. Finally, this study shows that the overall size of research institutes, available public engagement funding and public engagement staffing make a difference in institutes’ public engagement.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
2017
2021-02-23T17:56:26Z
2021-02-23T17:55:04Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22168
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/22168
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0963-6625
10.1177/0963662516633834
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134813016293376