Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2018000500003 |
Resumo: | Potato cyst nematodes are a threat to several agricultural crops around the world with some species considered quarantine pests and subjected to strict regulatory measures in many countries. Usually, cysts nematodes co-exist in the soil with other species of plant-parasitic nematodes, so, a time and cost-efficient extraction technique becomes of primary importance. The ideal extraction method should be able to obtain cysts as well as detecting the presence of other motile plant-parasitic nematodes with a potential impact on potato farming (such as Meloidogyne sp. and Pratylenchus sp.). In recent years, studies have been carried out to test the efficiency of various methods of nematode extraction but few results have been published. Therefore, to test if a method that extracts simultaneously cysts and motile nematodes can be used instead of the reference method that extracts cysts only, the efficiency of Cobbs decanting and sieving technique was compared to Fenwicks technique. As a result, in the 74 samples evaluated, a greater number of cysts were extracted from 24 samples using Fenwicks method and from 11 samples employing Cobbs decanting and sieving technique. The statistics results showed a significance level of 0,05 using Fenwicks can allowing to conclude that this method is much more efficient than Cobbs decanting and sieving technique, and confirming it should not be replaced by alternative methods for cysts extraction. |
id |
RCAP_e90e435ab71760aa711131279fc706f9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0871-018X2018000500003 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks methodextraction techniquesGlobodera pallidaGlobodera rostochiensisnematodesPCNPotato cyst nematodes are a threat to several agricultural crops around the world with some species considered quarantine pests and subjected to strict regulatory measures in many countries. Usually, cysts nematodes co-exist in the soil with other species of plant-parasitic nematodes, so, a time and cost-efficient extraction technique becomes of primary importance. The ideal extraction method should be able to obtain cysts as well as detecting the presence of other motile plant-parasitic nematodes with a potential impact on potato farming (such as Meloidogyne sp. and Pratylenchus sp.). In recent years, studies have been carried out to test the efficiency of various methods of nematode extraction but few results have been published. Therefore, to test if a method that extracts simultaneously cysts and motile nematodes can be used instead of the reference method that extracts cysts only, the efficiency of Cobbs decanting and sieving technique was compared to Fenwicks technique. As a result, in the 74 samples evaluated, a greater number of cysts were extracted from 24 samples using Fenwicks method and from 11 samples employing Cobbs decanting and sieving technique. The statistics results showed a significance level of 0,05 using Fenwicks can allowing to conclude that this method is much more efficient than Cobbs decanting and sieving technique, and confirming it should not be replaced by alternative methods for cysts extraction.Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal2018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2018000500003Revista de Ciências Agrárias v.41 n.spe 2018reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2018000500003Camacho,Maria J.Mota,MarianaLima,ArlindoRusinque,LeidyInácio,Maria L.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:02:38Zoai:scielo:S0871-018X2018000500003Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:17:37.017261Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method |
title |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method |
spellingShingle |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method Camacho,Maria J. extraction techniques Globodera pallida Globodera rostochiensis nematodes PCN |
title_short |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method |
title_full |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method |
title_fullStr |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method |
title_sort |
Extraction of potato cyst nematodes from soil samples: Cobbs decanting and sieving method vs. Fenwicks method |
author |
Camacho,Maria J. |
author_facet |
Camacho,Maria J. Mota,Mariana Lima,Arlindo Rusinque,Leidy Inácio,Maria L. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mota,Mariana Lima,Arlindo Rusinque,Leidy Inácio,Maria L. |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Camacho,Maria J. Mota,Mariana Lima,Arlindo Rusinque,Leidy Inácio,Maria L. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
extraction techniques Globodera pallida Globodera rostochiensis nematodes PCN |
topic |
extraction techniques Globodera pallida Globodera rostochiensis nematodes PCN |
description |
Potato cyst nematodes are a threat to several agricultural crops around the world with some species considered quarantine pests and subjected to strict regulatory measures in many countries. Usually, cysts nematodes co-exist in the soil with other species of plant-parasitic nematodes, so, a time and cost-efficient extraction technique becomes of primary importance. The ideal extraction method should be able to obtain cysts as well as detecting the presence of other motile plant-parasitic nematodes with a potential impact on potato farming (such as Meloidogyne sp. and Pratylenchus sp.). In recent years, studies have been carried out to test the efficiency of various methods of nematode extraction but few results have been published. Therefore, to test if a method that extracts simultaneously cysts and motile nematodes can be used instead of the reference method that extracts cysts only, the efficiency of Cobbs decanting and sieving technique was compared to Fenwicks technique. As a result, in the 74 samples evaluated, a greater number of cysts were extracted from 24 samples using Fenwicks method and from 11 samples employing Cobbs decanting and sieving technique. The statistics results showed a significance level of 0,05 using Fenwicks can allowing to conclude that this method is much more efficient than Cobbs decanting and sieving technique, and confirming it should not be replaced by alternative methods for cysts extraction. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2018000500003 |
url |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2018000500003 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0871-018X2018000500003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Agrárias v.41 n.spe 2018 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799137269705080832 |