Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6989 |
Resumo: | Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians' capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians' perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity. |
id |
RCAP_eb30111773b12bff5ff53fcfc2043f37 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/6989 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative researchGood patient outcomes correlate with the physicians' capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians' perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity.BMJ Publishing GroupRepositório do ISPARodrigues, David SilvérioSousa, Paulo FariaBasílio, NunoAntunes, AnaAntunes, Maria Da LuzSantos, Maria IsabelHeleno, Bruno2019-04-17T14:21:48Z2019-04-03T00:00:00Z2019-04-03T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6989engBMJ Open, 9(4), 1-5 Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-0238322044605510.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-09-05T16:42:41Zoai:repositorio.ispa.pt:10400.12/6989Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T15:24:49.671280Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
spellingShingle |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research Rodrigues, David Silvério |
title_short |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_full |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_fullStr |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_full_unstemmed |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_sort |
Primary care physicians' decision-making processes in the context of multimorbidity: protocol of a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
author |
Rodrigues, David Silvério |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, David Silvério Sousa, Paulo Faria Basílio, Nuno Antunes, Ana Antunes, Maria Da Luz Santos, Maria Isabel Heleno, Bruno |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Sousa, Paulo Faria Basílio, Nuno Antunes, Ana Antunes, Maria Da Luz Santos, Maria Isabel Heleno, Bruno |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do ISPA |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, David Silvério Sousa, Paulo Faria Basílio, Nuno Antunes, Ana Antunes, Maria Da Luz Santos, Maria Isabel Heleno, Bruno |
description |
Good patient outcomes correlate with the physicians' capacity for good clinical judgement. Multimorbidity is common and it increases uncertainty and complexity in the clinical encounter. However, healthcare systems and medical education are centred on individual diseases. In consequence, recognition of the patient as the centre of the decision-making process becomes even more difficult. Research in clinical reasoning and medical decision in a real-world context is needed. The aim of the present review is to identify and synthesise available qualitative evidence on primary care physicians' perspectives, views or experiences on decision-making with patients with multimorbidity. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-04-17T14:21:48Z 2019-04-03T00:00:00Z 2019-04-03T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6989 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/6989 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Open, 9(4), 1-5 Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832 20446055 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023832 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Publishing Group |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
BMJ Publishing Group |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130110012424192 |