Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalhinho, Sara
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Costa, A.M., Martins, E., Coelho, Ana Cláudia, Sampaio, Ana
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10348/2939
Resumo: Forty Candida albicans strains isolated from patient’s mouth with fixed orthodontic appliances were analyzed to their susceptibilities to antifungal agents, mouth rinses and essential oils. Susceptibility to fluconazole, econazole, miconazole and ketoconazole, amphotericin B and nystatin was assessed by the disk diffusion (DD) method based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M44-A protocol, and by Etest (fluconazole and amphotericin B). The susceptibilities to mouth rinses and essential oils were also determined by the DD technique. All isolates tested were susceptible (S) to amphotericin B, nystatin and fluconazole. The overall concordance between the DD and the Etest was 100% for amphotericin and fluconazole. One isolate was resistant to econazole (2.5%) and the other to ketoconazole (2.5%). Econazole and ketoconazole had the highest percentages of susceptible dose dependent (SDD), 55 and 95%, respectively. Regarding to the susceptibility isolates profile, seven phenotypes were detected, and the 3 more represented (90% of the isolates) of them were SDD to one, two or three azoles. The study of mouth rinses showed a high variability of efficacy against C. albicans. The results showed that the isolates susceptibility to essential oils differed (P\0.05). The profile activitywas: cinnamon[laurel[mint[eucalyptus[ rosemary[lemon[myrrh[tangerine. The main finding was that the susceptibility to cinnamon and laurel varied among the three more representative antifungal phenotypes (P\0.05). The susceptibility of econazole-SDD isolates to cinnamon and lemon was higher than those of the econazole-S yeasts (P\0.05). In contrast, econazole-SDD isolates were less affected by laurel than econazole-S counterparts (P\0.05).
id RCAP_eb6fbe071574ecd139967366cf64f64c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/2939
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinsesCandida albicansSusceptibilityAntifungalEssential oilsMouth rinsesForty Candida albicans strains isolated from patient’s mouth with fixed orthodontic appliances were analyzed to their susceptibilities to antifungal agents, mouth rinses and essential oils. Susceptibility to fluconazole, econazole, miconazole and ketoconazole, amphotericin B and nystatin was assessed by the disk diffusion (DD) method based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M44-A protocol, and by Etest (fluconazole and amphotericin B). The susceptibilities to mouth rinses and essential oils were also determined by the DD technique. All isolates tested were susceptible (S) to amphotericin B, nystatin and fluconazole. The overall concordance between the DD and the Etest was 100% for amphotericin and fluconazole. One isolate was resistant to econazole (2.5%) and the other to ketoconazole (2.5%). Econazole and ketoconazole had the highest percentages of susceptible dose dependent (SDD), 55 and 95%, respectively. Regarding to the susceptibility isolates profile, seven phenotypes were detected, and the 3 more represented (90% of the isolates) of them were SDD to one, two or three azoles. The study of mouth rinses showed a high variability of efficacy against C. albicans. The results showed that the isolates susceptibility to essential oils differed (P\0.05). The profile activitywas: cinnamon[laurel[mint[eucalyptus[ rosemary[lemon[myrrh[tangerine. The main finding was that the susceptibility to cinnamon and laurel varied among the three more representative antifungal phenotypes (P\0.05). The susceptibility of econazole-SDD isolates to cinnamon and lemon was higher than those of the econazole-S yeasts (P\0.05). In contrast, econazole-SDD isolates were less affected by laurel than econazole-S counterparts (P\0.05).2014-02-04T11:52:06Z2012-01-01T00:00:00Z2012info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10348/2939eng1573-0832Carvalhinho, SaraCosta, A.M.Martins, E.Coelho, Ana CláudiaSampaio, Anainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-02-02T12:45:36Zoai:repositorio.utad.pt:10348/2939Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:03:59.912404Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses
title Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses
spellingShingle Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses
Carvalhinho, Sara
Candida albicans
Susceptibility
Antifungal
Essential oils
Mouth rinses
title_short Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses
title_full Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses
title_fullStr Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses
title_full_unstemmed Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses
title_sort Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils, and mouth rinses
author Carvalhinho, Sara
author_facet Carvalhinho, Sara
Costa, A.M.
Martins, E.
Coelho, Ana Cláudia
Sampaio, Ana
author_role author
author2 Costa, A.M.
Martins, E.
Coelho, Ana Cláudia
Sampaio, Ana
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalhinho, Sara
Costa, A.M.
Martins, E.
Coelho, Ana Cláudia
Sampaio, Ana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Candida albicans
Susceptibility
Antifungal
Essential oils
Mouth rinses
topic Candida albicans
Susceptibility
Antifungal
Essential oils
Mouth rinses
description Forty Candida albicans strains isolated from patient’s mouth with fixed orthodontic appliances were analyzed to their susceptibilities to antifungal agents, mouth rinses and essential oils. Susceptibility to fluconazole, econazole, miconazole and ketoconazole, amphotericin B and nystatin was assessed by the disk diffusion (DD) method based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M44-A protocol, and by Etest (fluconazole and amphotericin B). The susceptibilities to mouth rinses and essential oils were also determined by the DD technique. All isolates tested were susceptible (S) to amphotericin B, nystatin and fluconazole. The overall concordance between the DD and the Etest was 100% for amphotericin and fluconazole. One isolate was resistant to econazole (2.5%) and the other to ketoconazole (2.5%). Econazole and ketoconazole had the highest percentages of susceptible dose dependent (SDD), 55 and 95%, respectively. Regarding to the susceptibility isolates profile, seven phenotypes were detected, and the 3 more represented (90% of the isolates) of them were SDD to one, two or three azoles. The study of mouth rinses showed a high variability of efficacy against C. albicans. The results showed that the isolates susceptibility to essential oils differed (P\0.05). The profile activitywas: cinnamon[laurel[mint[eucalyptus[ rosemary[lemon[myrrh[tangerine. The main finding was that the susceptibility to cinnamon and laurel varied among the three more representative antifungal phenotypes (P\0.05). The susceptibility of econazole-SDD isolates to cinnamon and lemon was higher than those of the econazole-S yeasts (P\0.05). In contrast, econazole-SDD isolates were less affected by laurel than econazole-S counterparts (P\0.05).
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-01-01T00:00:00Z
2012
2014-02-04T11:52:06Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10348/2939
url http://hdl.handle.net/10348/2939
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1573-0832
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137125608718336