Cognition, emotion and action

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cunha, Miguel Pina e
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Soares Leitão, Maria João, Clegg, Stewart, Hernández-Linares, Remedios, Moasa, Horia, Randerson, Kathleen, Rego, Arménio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/114763
Resumo: The purpose of the study is to explore inductively the unique paradoxical tensions central to family business (FB) and to analyze how FB's members face these tensions and their implications in the personal and professional realms. Design/methodology/approach: A multiple-case study with 11 parent–offspring dyads from Portuguese FBs was conducted putting the focus on the micro-level interactions. Findings: The slopes of roles and relationality in FBs produces three persistent sets of tensions around cognition, emotion and action. These tensions exist in a paradoxical state, containing potentiality for synergy or trade-off. Originality/value: Our study is the first to empirically demonstrate that paradoxical tensions between parent and offspring are interrelated, by emphasizing the uniqueness of FB as a paradoxical setting and offering insights to negotiating of these singular paradoxes.
id RCAP_eb8cf8b151301af1561cd79010d681e3
oai_identifier_str oai:run.unl.pt:10362/114763
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Cognition, emotion and actionPersistent sources of parent–offspring paradoxes in the family businessBusiness familiesMicro-foundationsParadoxParental relationshipsRole conflictEconomics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)Strategy and ManagementThe purpose of the study is to explore inductively the unique paradoxical tensions central to family business (FB) and to analyze how FB's members face these tensions and their implications in the personal and professional realms. Design/methodology/approach: A multiple-case study with 11 parent–offspring dyads from Portuguese FBs was conducted putting the focus on the micro-level interactions. Findings: The slopes of roles and relationality in FBs produces three persistent sets of tensions around cognition, emotion and action. These tensions exist in a paradoxical state, containing potentiality for synergy or trade-off. Originality/value: Our study is the first to empirically demonstrate that paradoxical tensions between parent and offspring are interrelated, by emphasizing the uniqueness of FB as a paradoxical setting and offering insights to negotiating of these singular paradoxes.NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE)RUNCunha, Miguel Pina eSoares Leitão, Maria JoãoClegg, StewartHernández-Linares, RemediosMoasa, HoriaRanderson, KathleenRego, Arménio2021-03-30T22:22:06Z2022-12-012022-12-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10362/114763eng2043-6238PURE: 28964056https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-11-2020-0104info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-03-11T04:57:32Zoai:run.unl.pt:10362/114763Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T03:42:38.106689Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Cognition, emotion and action
Persistent sources of parent–offspring paradoxes in the family business
title Cognition, emotion and action
spellingShingle Cognition, emotion and action
Cunha, Miguel Pina e
Business families
Micro-foundations
Paradox
Parental relationships
Role conflict
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Strategy and Management
title_short Cognition, emotion and action
title_full Cognition, emotion and action
title_fullStr Cognition, emotion and action
title_full_unstemmed Cognition, emotion and action
title_sort Cognition, emotion and action
author Cunha, Miguel Pina e
author_facet Cunha, Miguel Pina e
Soares Leitão, Maria João
Clegg, Stewart
Hernández-Linares, Remedios
Moasa, Horia
Randerson, Kathleen
Rego, Arménio
author_role author
author2 Soares Leitão, Maria João
Clegg, Stewart
Hernández-Linares, Remedios
Moasa, Horia
Randerson, Kathleen
Rego, Arménio
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv NOVA School of Business and Economics (NOVA SBE)
RUN
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cunha, Miguel Pina e
Soares Leitão, Maria João
Clegg, Stewart
Hernández-Linares, Remedios
Moasa, Horia
Randerson, Kathleen
Rego, Arménio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Business families
Micro-foundations
Paradox
Parental relationships
Role conflict
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Strategy and Management
topic Business families
Micro-foundations
Paradox
Parental relationships
Role conflict
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
Strategy and Management
description The purpose of the study is to explore inductively the unique paradoxical tensions central to family business (FB) and to analyze how FB's members face these tensions and their implications in the personal and professional realms. Design/methodology/approach: A multiple-case study with 11 parent–offspring dyads from Portuguese FBs was conducted putting the focus on the micro-level interactions. Findings: The slopes of roles and relationality in FBs produces three persistent sets of tensions around cognition, emotion and action. These tensions exist in a paradoxical state, containing potentiality for synergy or trade-off. Originality/value: Our study is the first to empirically demonstrate that paradoxical tensions between parent and offspring are interrelated, by emphasizing the uniqueness of FB as a paradoxical setting and offering insights to negotiating of these singular paradoxes.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-30T22:22:06Z
2022-12-01
2022-12-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10362/114763
url http://hdl.handle.net/10362/114763
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2043-6238
PURE: 28964056
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFBM-11-2020-0104
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799138037827895296