How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo de conferência |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34223 |
Resumo: | Using data from 141 countries, this paper identifies the variables that best characterize banking regulation and supervision practices around the world. A nonlinear principal components analysis with optimal variable transformation is used to deal with the mixed measurement levels of the variables and to reduce data dimensionality; and results robustness is tested for different subsamples. Deposit insurance, liquidity and diversification requirements, complementary banking activities and market discipline are found to be the most reliable indicators to measure regulation, while resolution activities, the mandate of the head of the supervisory agency and the report of prudential regulation infractions assume the same role for banking supervision. Capital requirements and ownership are of minor relevance and are sensitive to country’s development level. The most distinct regulation practices are displayed by China and Germany, while in terms of supervision China and the UK adopt the most extreme policies. |
id |
RCAP_ec2f82599b5b67c1bb5d63b95c78b249 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/34223 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and SupersionBanking regulationbanking supervisionnonlinear principal components analysisUsing data from 141 countries, this paper identifies the variables that best characterize banking regulation and supervision practices around the world. A nonlinear principal components analysis with optimal variable transformation is used to deal with the mixed measurement levels of the variables and to reduce data dimensionality; and results robustness is tested for different subsamples. Deposit insurance, liquidity and diversification requirements, complementary banking activities and market discipline are found to be the most reliable indicators to measure regulation, while resolution activities, the mandate of the head of the supervisory agency and the report of prudential regulation infractions assume the same role for banking supervision. Capital requirements and ownership are of minor relevance and are sensitive to country’s development level. The most distinct regulation practices are displayed by China and Germany, while in terms of supervision China and the UK adopt the most extreme policies.14th Annual Meeting of the Portuguese Economic Journal2023-02-13T16:52:32Z2023-02-132021-07-03T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/34223http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34223enghttps://www.dropbox.com/s/l9zongt1dh4v85t/Ap6_PEJ2021_CristinaPereiraPedro.pdf?dl=0simnaonaocristinaP@uevora.ptjjsro@iscte.ptjsilva@uevora.pt664Pedro, CristinaRamalho, JoaquimSilva, Jacintoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:34:31Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/34223Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T01:21:59.052720Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion |
title |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion |
spellingShingle |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion Pedro, Cristina Banking regulation banking supervision nonlinear principal components analysis |
title_short |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion |
title_full |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion |
title_fullStr |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion |
title_full_unstemmed |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion |
title_sort |
How to Measure Banking Regulation and Supersion |
author |
Pedro, Cristina |
author_facet |
Pedro, Cristina Ramalho, Joaquim Silva, Jacinto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ramalho, Joaquim Silva, Jacinto |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pedro, Cristina Ramalho, Joaquim Silva, Jacinto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Banking regulation banking supervision nonlinear principal components analysis |
topic |
Banking regulation banking supervision nonlinear principal components analysis |
description |
Using data from 141 countries, this paper identifies the variables that best characterize banking regulation and supervision practices around the world. A nonlinear principal components analysis with optimal variable transformation is used to deal with the mixed measurement levels of the variables and to reduce data dimensionality; and results robustness is tested for different subsamples. Deposit insurance, liquidity and diversification requirements, complementary banking activities and market discipline are found to be the most reliable indicators to measure regulation, while resolution activities, the mandate of the head of the supervisory agency and the report of prudential regulation infractions assume the same role for banking supervision. Capital requirements and ownership are of minor relevance and are sensitive to country’s development level. The most distinct regulation practices are displayed by China and Germany, while in terms of supervision China and the UK adopt the most extreme policies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-03T00:00:00Z 2023-02-13T16:52:32Z 2023-02-13 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObject |
format |
conferenceObject |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34223 http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34223 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/34223 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l9zongt1dh4v85t/Ap6_PEJ2021_CristinaPereiraPedro.pdf?dl=0 sim nao nao cristinaP@uevora.pt jjsro@iscte.pt jsilva@uevora.pt 664 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
14th Annual Meeting of the Portuguese Economic Journal |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
14th Annual Meeting of the Portuguese Economic Journal |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799136701549903872 |