Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Costa, Paulo
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Esteves, Rui, Lages, Patrícia, Ferreira, Filipa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159
Resumo: Introduction: Oesophagectomy for cancer is associated to a significant morbidity and mortality. The superiority of transthoracic vs transhiatal is still a matter of controversy. The aim of this paper is to discuss the results of a series of patients submitted to either a transthoracic or a transhiatal according to the anatomic location regarding the carina.Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 52 consecutive patients, with oesophageal carcinoma, 7 female and 45 males, median age 64 [46-85] years. Location: cervical – 1; above carina - 22; below or at carina level - 19; cardia type I –10. 19 adenocarcinoma, 32 squamous cells, 1 lymphoma. Twenty patients (40%) – neo-adjuvant therapy. Thoracoabdominal approach – 3, cervico-thoracoabdominal – 20, transhiatal – 27, exploratory thoracotomy – 2. Gastric pull-up 49 (cervical anastomosis – 46; thoracic - 3); cervical oesofagocoloplasty -1.Results: Pathologic staging: complete remission - 8; Ib – 3; IIa – 9; IIb - 4; IIa – 11; IIIb -2; IIIc – 10; IV – 1; non-stageable - 3. Major complications: 37%. Resectability: 96% (50/52). Mortality: 4th week - 6%; in-hospital - 14%. Median survival 18 months [3-80]. Survival Curves (Kaplan-Meier): 2 years - 47%; 5 years - 19% (transthoracic vs transhiatal p > 0.05).Discussion: Selection of surgical approach based on the anatomic location of the tumour regarding the carina was safe, the resectability was high and similar when a transthoracic or a transhiatal was planed and carry-on.Conclusions: In this series of oesophageal cancer patients, in advanced pathologic condition (52% p Stages III/IV) the overall survival was similar for transthoracic and transhiatal. Neo-adjuvant treatments definitively contributed to enhance resectability.Keywords: Esophagectomy; Laparoscopy; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery; Thoracotomy.
id RCAP_ee78c2a774b7e3dae9b9d2332a864580
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5159
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Esophageal Cancer: Surgical StrategiesCancro do Esófago: Estratégia de Abordagem CirúrgicaIntroduction: Oesophagectomy for cancer is associated to a significant morbidity and mortality. The superiority of transthoracic vs transhiatal is still a matter of controversy. The aim of this paper is to discuss the results of a series of patients submitted to either a transthoracic or a transhiatal according to the anatomic location regarding the carina.Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 52 consecutive patients, with oesophageal carcinoma, 7 female and 45 males, median age 64 [46-85] years. Location: cervical – 1; above carina - 22; below or at carina level - 19; cardia type I –10. 19 adenocarcinoma, 32 squamous cells, 1 lymphoma. Twenty patients (40%) – neo-adjuvant therapy. Thoracoabdominal approach – 3, cervico-thoracoabdominal – 20, transhiatal – 27, exploratory thoracotomy – 2. Gastric pull-up 49 (cervical anastomosis – 46; thoracic - 3); cervical oesofagocoloplasty -1.Results: Pathologic staging: complete remission - 8; Ib – 3; IIa – 9; IIb - 4; IIa – 11; IIIb -2; IIIc – 10; IV – 1; non-stageable - 3. Major complications: 37%. Resectability: 96% (50/52). Mortality: 4th week - 6%; in-hospital - 14%. Median survival 18 months [3-80]. Survival Curves (Kaplan-Meier): 2 years - 47%; 5 years - 19% (transthoracic vs transhiatal p > 0.05).Discussion: Selection of surgical approach based on the anatomic location of the tumour regarding the carina was safe, the resectability was high and similar when a transthoracic or a transhiatal was planed and carry-on.Conclusions: In this series of oesophageal cancer patients, in advanced pathologic condition (52% p Stages III/IV) the overall survival was similar for transthoracic and transhiatal. Neo-adjuvant treatments definitively contributed to enhance resectability.Keywords: Esophagectomy; Laparoscopy; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery; Thoracotomy.Introdução: A ressecção transmediastínica e a ressecção transtorácica têm mortalidade hospitalar (1,4% -14%) e sobrevivência (± 25% aos cinco anos) semelhantes. A terapêutica neo-adjuvante é opção em estádios avançados. A intenção deste trabalho é apresentar uma série consecutiva de 52 doentes - opção operatória baseada na localização anatómica: tumores infra-carinais e cervicais submetidos a ressecção transmediastínica e restantes ressecções transtorácicas.Material e Métodos: O estudo incluiu 52 doentes consecutivos, sete mulheres e 45 homens, mediana de idade: 64 anos [46- 85]. Localização: cervical – um; montante da carina - 22; jusante da carina -19; cárdia tipo I –10. Histologia: 19 adenocarcinomas, 32 carcinomas pavimento-celulares, um linfoma. Vinte doentes (40%) - terapêutica neoadjuvante. Abordagem tóraco-abdominal – três, tóraco-abdómino-cervical – 20, transhiatal – 27, toracotomia exploradora – dois. Transposição gástrica 49 (anastomose cervical – 46; torácica - três); esofagocoloplastia cervical - um.Resultados: Estadiamento patológico: regressão completa - 8; Ib – 3; IIa – 9; IIb - 4; IIa – 11; IIIb -2; IIIc – 10; IV – 1; linfoma - um; não classificáveis – três. Complicações major: 37%. Ressecabilidade: 96% (50/52). Mortalidade: quatro semanas - 6%; hospitalar - 14%. Sobrevida mediana 18 meses [3-80]. Curvas de sobrevida (Kaplan-Meier): dois anos - 47%; cinco anos - 19%.Discussão: Não tendo sido demonstrada vantagem oncológica para a ressecção transtorácica ou a ressecção transmediastínica,basear a opção operatória na localização do tumor permitiu-nos com segurança e eficácia, planear e executar as ressecções esofágicas desta série.Conclusão: As curvas de sobrevida foram sobreponíveis para ressecção transtorácica e ressecção transmediastínica e bastantefavoráveis numa população com 52 % de estádios pIII/IV. A quimio-radioterapia contribuiu para aumentar a ressecabilidade.Palavras-chave: Esofagectomia; Laparoscopia; Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia; Toracotomia.Ordem dos Médicos2014-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5159Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 No. 5 (2014): September-October; 593-600Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 N.º 5 (2014): Setembro-Outubro; 593-6001646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporenghttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159/4069https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159/4184Costa, PauloEsteves, RuiLages, PatríciaFerreira, Filipainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T11:04:14Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5159Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:19:02.353337Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies
Cancro do Esófago: Estratégia de Abordagem Cirúrgica
title Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies
spellingShingle Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies
Costa, Paulo
title_short Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies
title_full Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies
title_fullStr Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies
title_full_unstemmed Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies
title_sort Esophageal Cancer: Surgical Strategies
author Costa, Paulo
author_facet Costa, Paulo
Esteves, Rui
Lages, Patrícia
Ferreira, Filipa
author_role author
author2 Esteves, Rui
Lages, Patrícia
Ferreira, Filipa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Costa, Paulo
Esteves, Rui
Lages, Patrícia
Ferreira, Filipa
description Introduction: Oesophagectomy for cancer is associated to a significant morbidity and mortality. The superiority of transthoracic vs transhiatal is still a matter of controversy. The aim of this paper is to discuss the results of a series of patients submitted to either a transthoracic or a transhiatal according to the anatomic location regarding the carina.Material and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 52 consecutive patients, with oesophageal carcinoma, 7 female and 45 males, median age 64 [46-85] years. Location: cervical – 1; above carina - 22; below or at carina level - 19; cardia type I –10. 19 adenocarcinoma, 32 squamous cells, 1 lymphoma. Twenty patients (40%) – neo-adjuvant therapy. Thoracoabdominal approach – 3, cervico-thoracoabdominal – 20, transhiatal – 27, exploratory thoracotomy – 2. Gastric pull-up 49 (cervical anastomosis – 46; thoracic - 3); cervical oesofagocoloplasty -1.Results: Pathologic staging: complete remission - 8; Ib – 3; IIa – 9; IIb - 4; IIa – 11; IIIb -2; IIIc – 10; IV – 1; non-stageable - 3. Major complications: 37%. Resectability: 96% (50/52). Mortality: 4th week - 6%; in-hospital - 14%. Median survival 18 months [3-80]. Survival Curves (Kaplan-Meier): 2 years - 47%; 5 years - 19% (transthoracic vs transhiatal p > 0.05).Discussion: Selection of surgical approach based on the anatomic location of the tumour regarding the carina was safe, the resectability was high and similar when a transthoracic or a transhiatal was planed and carry-on.Conclusions: In this series of oesophageal cancer patients, in advanced pathologic condition (52% p Stages III/IV) the overall survival was similar for transthoracic and transhiatal. Neo-adjuvant treatments definitively contributed to enhance resectability.Keywords: Esophagectomy; Laparoscopy; Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery; Thoracotomy.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-25
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5159
url https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/5159
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159/4069
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/5159/4184
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ordem dos Médicos
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 No. 5 (2014): September-October; 593-600
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 27 N.º 5 (2014): Setembro-Outubro; 593-600
1646-0758
0870-399X
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130641460101120