Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Areia, Neide P.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Fonseca, Gabriela, Major, Sofia de Oliveira, Relvas, Ana P.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/89328
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951518000044
Resumo: Objective. The issues surrounding a patient's terminal phase of cancer and the imminent death of the individual represent a major family crisis affecting all its members. The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers of persons with terminal cancer in terms of psychological distress, depression, anxiety, somatization, and complicated anticipatory grief, and to determine which factors may influence these responses. Method. One hundred and twelve family caregivers of individuals with terminal cancer completed an assessment protocol comprising the Brief Symptom Inventory (depression, anxiety, somatization, and a computed score for global distress), the Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory - Short Form (anticipatory grief), the Family Inventory of Needs (importance and satisfaction of needs), and the Systemic Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation -15 (family functioning). Prevalence of psychological morbidity was determined through descriptive and frequency statistics. Predictors of psychological morbidity were ascertained through structural equation modelling methods. Result. Regarding the prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers, 66.1% reported high levels of distress, 68.8% showed high risk of depression, 72.3% showed high risk of anxiety, 50.9% reported high levels of somatization, and 25.9% showed high risk of complicated anticipatory grief. It was found that the predictors of age, gender, relationship to the family member with terminal cancer, the caregiving role played (i.e., primary vs. nonprimary), the satisfaction of needs by healthcare professionals, and family functioning play an important role in terms of one’s risk of developing psychological morbidity. Significance of results. This study revealed an alarming prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers of individuals living with terminal cancer, making it crucial to move forward from a patient-centered approach to a family-centrad approach to reduce the risk of family maladjustment when facing the imminent death of a family member and to prevent postdeath unadjusted responses.
id RCAP_f10d4578976bd4a05a258b7d08a57375
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/89328
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictorsPsychological morbidityCancerFamily caregiversPalliative careRisk factorsObjective. The issues surrounding a patient's terminal phase of cancer and the imminent death of the individual represent a major family crisis affecting all its members. The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers of persons with terminal cancer in terms of psychological distress, depression, anxiety, somatization, and complicated anticipatory grief, and to determine which factors may influence these responses. Method. One hundred and twelve family caregivers of individuals with terminal cancer completed an assessment protocol comprising the Brief Symptom Inventory (depression, anxiety, somatization, and a computed score for global distress), the Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory - Short Form (anticipatory grief), the Family Inventory of Needs (importance and satisfaction of needs), and the Systemic Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation -15 (family functioning). Prevalence of psychological morbidity was determined through descriptive and frequency statistics. Predictors of psychological morbidity were ascertained through structural equation modelling methods. Result. Regarding the prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers, 66.1% reported high levels of distress, 68.8% showed high risk of depression, 72.3% showed high risk of anxiety, 50.9% reported high levels of somatization, and 25.9% showed high risk of complicated anticipatory grief. It was found that the predictors of age, gender, relationship to the family member with terminal cancer, the caregiving role played (i.e., primary vs. nonprimary), the satisfaction of needs by healthcare professionals, and family functioning play an important role in terms of one’s risk of developing psychological morbidity. Significance of results. This study revealed an alarming prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers of individuals living with terminal cancer, making it crucial to move forward from a patient-centered approach to a family-centrad approach to reduce the risk of family maladjustment when facing the imminent death of a family member and to prevent postdeath unadjusted responses.Cambridge University Press2019info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/89328http://hdl.handle.net/10316/89328https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951518000044eng1478-95151478-9523https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1478951518000044Areia, Neide P.Fonseca, GabrielaMajor, Sofia de OliveiraRelvas, Ana P.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2021-05-11T15:44:49Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/89328Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:09:40.860975Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors
title Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors
spellingShingle Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors
Areia, Neide P.
Psychological morbidity
Cancer
Family caregivers
Palliative care
Risk factors
title_short Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors
title_full Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors
title_fullStr Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors
title_full_unstemmed Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors
title_sort Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors
author Areia, Neide P.
author_facet Areia, Neide P.
Fonseca, Gabriela
Major, Sofia de Oliveira
Relvas, Ana P.
author_role author
author2 Fonseca, Gabriela
Major, Sofia de Oliveira
Relvas, Ana P.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Areia, Neide P.
Fonseca, Gabriela
Major, Sofia de Oliveira
Relvas, Ana P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Psychological morbidity
Cancer
Family caregivers
Palliative care
Risk factors
topic Psychological morbidity
Cancer
Family caregivers
Palliative care
Risk factors
description Objective. The issues surrounding a patient's terminal phase of cancer and the imminent death of the individual represent a major family crisis affecting all its members. The goal of this study was to assess the prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers of persons with terminal cancer in terms of psychological distress, depression, anxiety, somatization, and complicated anticipatory grief, and to determine which factors may influence these responses. Method. One hundred and twelve family caregivers of individuals with terminal cancer completed an assessment protocol comprising the Brief Symptom Inventory (depression, anxiety, somatization, and a computed score for global distress), the Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory - Short Form (anticipatory grief), the Family Inventory of Needs (importance and satisfaction of needs), and the Systemic Clinical Outcome Routine Evaluation -15 (family functioning). Prevalence of psychological morbidity was determined through descriptive and frequency statistics. Predictors of psychological morbidity were ascertained through structural equation modelling methods. Result. Regarding the prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers, 66.1% reported high levels of distress, 68.8% showed high risk of depression, 72.3% showed high risk of anxiety, 50.9% reported high levels of somatization, and 25.9% showed high risk of complicated anticipatory grief. It was found that the predictors of age, gender, relationship to the family member with terminal cancer, the caregiving role played (i.e., primary vs. nonprimary), the satisfaction of needs by healthcare professionals, and family functioning play an important role in terms of one’s risk of developing psychological morbidity. Significance of results. This study revealed an alarming prevalence of psychological morbidity in family caregivers of individuals living with terminal cancer, making it crucial to move forward from a patient-centered approach to a family-centrad approach to reduce the risk of family maladjustment when facing the imminent death of a family member and to prevent postdeath unadjusted responses.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/89328
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/89328
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951518000044
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/89328
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951518000044
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 1478-9515
1478-9523
https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S1478951518000044
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133992244477952