Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendonca, Alexandre
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Santos, Helena, Franco-Duarte, Ricardo, Sampaio, Paula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80198
Resumo: Despite the scientific advances observed in the recent decades and the emergence of new methodologies, the diagnosis of systemic fungal infections persists as a problematic issue. Fungal cultivation, the stan-dard method that allows a proven diagnosis, has numerous disadvantages, as low sensitivity (only 50% of the patients present positive fungal cultures), and long growth time. These are factors that delay the patient's treatment and, consequently, lead to higher hospital costs. To improve the accuracy and quickness of fungal infections diagnosis, several new methodologies attempt to be implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories. Most of these innovative methods are independent of pathogen isolation, which means that the diagnosis goes from being considered proven to probable. In spite of the advantage of being culture-independent, the majority of the methods lack standardization. PCR-based methods are becoming more and more commonly used, which has earned them an important place in hospital laboratories. This can be perceived now, as PCR-based methodologies have proved to be an essential tool fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to go through the main steps of the diagnosis for systemic fungal infection, from diagnostic classifications, through methodologies considered as "gold standard", to the molecular methods currently used, and finally mentioning some of the more futuristic approaches.(c) 2021 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
id RCAP_f116f9d619c2c94d61e353f4c86c5338
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/80198
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and futureFungal infections diagnosisProven diagnosisProbable diagnosisGold standard methodologiesPCR-based methodologiesScience & TechnologyDespite the scientific advances observed in the recent decades and the emergence of new methodologies, the diagnosis of systemic fungal infections persists as a problematic issue. Fungal cultivation, the stan-dard method that allows a proven diagnosis, has numerous disadvantages, as low sensitivity (only 50% of the patients present positive fungal cultures), and long growth time. These are factors that delay the patient's treatment and, consequently, lead to higher hospital costs. To improve the accuracy and quickness of fungal infections diagnosis, several new methodologies attempt to be implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories. Most of these innovative methods are independent of pathogen isolation, which means that the diagnosis goes from being considered proven to probable. In spite of the advantage of being culture-independent, the majority of the methods lack standardization. PCR-based methods are becoming more and more commonly used, which has earned them an important place in hospital laboratories. This can be perceived now, as PCR-based methodologies have proved to be an essential tool fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to go through the main steps of the diagnosis for systemic fungal infection, from diagnostic classifications, through methodologies considered as "gold standard", to the molecular methods currently used, and finally mentioning some of the more futuristic approaches.(c) 2021 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.This work was supported by the UID/BIA/04050/2013 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007569) and UID/BIA/04050/2019 strategic programs, which is funded by national funds through the FCT-Fundacao para a Ciência e Tecnologia, and by the ERDF-European Regional Devel-opment Fund through the COMPETE2020-Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao (POCI) and Sistema de Apoio à Investigacao Cientifica e Tecnol?ogica (SAICT) .ElsevierUniversidade do MinhoMendonca, AlexandreSantos, HelenaFranco-Duarte, RicardoSampaio, Paula2022-032022-03-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/80198engMendonça, A., Santos, H., Franco-Duarte, R., & Sampaio, P. (2022, March). Fungal infections diagnosis – Past, present and future. Research in Microbiology. Elsevier BV. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2021.1039150923-250810.1016/j.resmic.2021.10391534863883https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923250821001297info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:20:13Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/80198Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:13:18.884583Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future
title Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future
spellingShingle Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future
Mendonca, Alexandre
Fungal infections diagnosis
Proven diagnosis
Probable diagnosis
Gold standard methodologies
PCR-based methodologies
Science & Technology
title_short Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future
title_full Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future
title_fullStr Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future
title_full_unstemmed Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future
title_sort Fungal infections diagnosis - Past, present and future
author Mendonca, Alexandre
author_facet Mendonca, Alexandre
Santos, Helena
Franco-Duarte, Ricardo
Sampaio, Paula
author_role author
author2 Santos, Helena
Franco-Duarte, Ricardo
Sampaio, Paula
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendonca, Alexandre
Santos, Helena
Franco-Duarte, Ricardo
Sampaio, Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Fungal infections diagnosis
Proven diagnosis
Probable diagnosis
Gold standard methodologies
PCR-based methodologies
Science & Technology
topic Fungal infections diagnosis
Proven diagnosis
Probable diagnosis
Gold standard methodologies
PCR-based methodologies
Science & Technology
description Despite the scientific advances observed in the recent decades and the emergence of new methodologies, the diagnosis of systemic fungal infections persists as a problematic issue. Fungal cultivation, the stan-dard method that allows a proven diagnosis, has numerous disadvantages, as low sensitivity (only 50% of the patients present positive fungal cultures), and long growth time. These are factors that delay the patient's treatment and, consequently, lead to higher hospital costs. To improve the accuracy and quickness of fungal infections diagnosis, several new methodologies attempt to be implemented in clinical microbiology laboratories. Most of these innovative methods are independent of pathogen isolation, which means that the diagnosis goes from being considered proven to probable. In spite of the advantage of being culture-independent, the majority of the methods lack standardization. PCR-based methods are becoming more and more commonly used, which has earned them an important place in hospital laboratories. This can be perceived now, as PCR-based methodologies have proved to be an essential tool fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. This review aims to go through the main steps of the diagnosis for systemic fungal infection, from diagnostic classifications, through methodologies considered as "gold standard", to the molecular methods currently used, and finally mentioning some of the more futuristic approaches.(c) 2021 Institut Pasteur. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03
2022-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80198
url https://hdl.handle.net/1822/80198
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Mendonça, A., Santos, H., Franco-Duarte, R., & Sampaio, P. (2022, March). Fungal infections diagnosis – Past, present and future. Research in Microbiology. Elsevier BV. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.resmic.2021.103915
0923-2508
10.1016/j.resmic.2021.103915
34863883
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923250821001297
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799132571955625984