Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19711 |
Resumo: | The thesis examines the generosity of unemployment benefits granted to non-standard (outsiders) and standard workers (insiders) in four different countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy and Sweden) between 2000 and 2017, which were selected based on their value to represent a different institutional legacy. These legacies were based off the Varieties of Capitalism literature and the Welfare Regime literature. Comparative Case Study Analysis was the chosen methodology to assess the unemployment benefit reforms, which were primarily retrieved from the LABREF database. Two supporting theories were used to analyse the outcomes, dualization theory and liberalization theory. The findings showed a clear correlation between the institutional legacies of each case and the generosity of the unemployment benefits given to insiders and outsiders. The alternative explanation that a common trend towards liberalization made unemployment benefit systems converge in all four countries could not be supported. |
id |
RCAP_f1267e791402b7f1bea3ff3410aa2d67 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/19711 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contractsDesemprego -- UnemploymentUnemployment insuranceUnemployment modelsEmploymentThe thesis examines the generosity of unemployment benefits granted to non-standard (outsiders) and standard workers (insiders) in four different countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy and Sweden) between 2000 and 2017, which were selected based on their value to represent a different institutional legacy. These legacies were based off the Varieties of Capitalism literature and the Welfare Regime literature. Comparative Case Study Analysis was the chosen methodology to assess the unemployment benefit reforms, which were primarily retrieved from the LABREF database. Two supporting theories were used to analyse the outcomes, dualization theory and liberalization theory. The findings showed a clear correlation between the institutional legacies of each case and the generosity of the unemployment benefits given to insiders and outsiders. The alternative explanation that a common trend towards liberalization made unemployment benefit systems converge in all four countries could not be supported.2020-01-27T16:11:58Z2020-01-13T00:00:00Z2020-01-132019-10info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/19711TID:202372758engBerfelde, Mathildeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T03:47:06Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/19711Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-07-07T03:47:06Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts |
title |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts |
spellingShingle |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts Berfelde, Mathilde Desemprego -- Unemployment Unemployment insurance Unemployment models Employment |
title_short |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts |
title_full |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts |
title_fullStr |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts |
title_sort |
Recent trends and reforms in unemployment benefit coverage: the case of employees with non-standard contracts |
author |
Berfelde, Mathilde |
author_facet |
Berfelde, Mathilde |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Berfelde, Mathilde |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Desemprego -- Unemployment Unemployment insurance Unemployment models Employment |
topic |
Desemprego -- Unemployment Unemployment insurance Unemployment models Employment |
description |
The thesis examines the generosity of unemployment benefits granted to non-standard (outsiders) and standard workers (insiders) in four different countries (Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy and Sweden) between 2000 and 2017, which were selected based on their value to represent a different institutional legacy. These legacies were based off the Varieties of Capitalism literature and the Welfare Regime literature. Comparative Case Study Analysis was the chosen methodology to assess the unemployment benefit reforms, which were primarily retrieved from the LABREF database. Two supporting theories were used to analyse the outcomes, dualization theory and liberalization theory. The findings showed a clear correlation between the institutional legacies of each case and the generosity of the unemployment benefits given to insiders and outsiders. The alternative explanation that a common trend towards liberalization made unemployment benefit systems converge in all four countries could not be supported. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-10 2020-01-27T16:11:58Z 2020-01-13T00:00:00Z 2020-01-13 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19711 TID:202372758 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10071/19711 |
identifier_str_mv |
TID:202372758 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mluisa.alvim@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1817546540530532352 |