Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chau, Hing-Wah
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Gilzean, Ian, Jamei, Elmira, Palmer, Lesley, Preece, Terri, Quirke, Martin
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5668
Resumo: Twenty-minute neighbourhoods highlight the importance of well-connected and mixed-used neighbourhoods and communities with proximate access to employment, essential services, public transport, and open spaces. Shorter distances together with re-prioritised public spaces encourage more active transport choices, resulting in public health benefits and reduced environmental pollution. Higher liveability brought about by mixed-use developments enables people to have equitable access to local facilities, amenities, and employment opportunities, promoting vibrancy, social cohesion, and intergenerational connections. The attributes of 20-minute neighbourhoods also combine to create places, that are acknowledged as friendly for all ages, address changing needs across the life course, and provide better support for the ageing population. Furthermore, there are indications that 20-minute neighbourhoods may be more resilient against many of the negative impacts of stringent public health protocols such as those implemented in periods of lockdown during the Covid-19 pandemic. In this article, we evaluate and compare planning policies and practices aimed at establishing 20-minute neighbourhoods in Melbourne (Australia) and Scotland (the UK). Using case studies, we discuss similarities and differences involved in using place-based approaches of 20-minute neighbourhoods to address 21st-century challenges in key areas of health and wellbeing, equity, environmental sustainability, and community resilience.
id RCAP_f1ea218609a0097609d0dcf0387954c0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5668
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland20-minute neighbourhood; accessibility; active transport; age-friendly; Australia; climate change; Covid-19; liveability; Scotland; walkabilityTwenty-minute neighbourhoods highlight the importance of well-connected and mixed-used neighbourhoods and communities with proximate access to employment, essential services, public transport, and open spaces. Shorter distances together with re-prioritised public spaces encourage more active transport choices, resulting in public health benefits and reduced environmental pollution. Higher liveability brought about by mixed-use developments enables people to have equitable access to local facilities, amenities, and employment opportunities, promoting vibrancy, social cohesion, and intergenerational connections. The attributes of 20-minute neighbourhoods also combine to create places, that are acknowledged as friendly for all ages, address changing needs across the life course, and provide better support for the ageing population. Furthermore, there are indications that 20-minute neighbourhoods may be more resilient against many of the negative impacts of stringent public health protocols such as those implemented in periods of lockdown during the Covid-19 pandemic. In this article, we evaluate and compare planning policies and practices aimed at establishing 20-minute neighbourhoods in Melbourne (Australia) and Scotland (the UK). Using case studies, we discuss similarities and differences involved in using place-based approaches of 20-minute neighbourhoods to address 21st-century challenges in key areas of health and wellbeing, equity, environmental sustainability, and community resilience.Cogitatio2022-10-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5668oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5668Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 4 (2022): Healthy Cities: Effective Urban Planning Approaches to a Changing World; 13-242183-7635reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5668https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5668https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5668/5668Copyright (c) 2022 Hing-Wah Chau, Ian Gilzean, Elmira Jamei, Lesley Palmer, Terri Preece, Martin Quirkeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessChau, Hing-WahGilzean, IanJamei, ElmiraPalmer, LesleyPreece, TerriQuirke, Martin2022-12-20T10:59:42Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5668Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:21:52.845462Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland
title Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland
spellingShingle Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland
Chau, Hing-Wah
20-minute neighbourhood; accessibility; active transport; age-friendly; Australia; climate change; Covid-19; liveability; Scotland; walkability
title_short Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland
title_full Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland
title_sort Comparative Analysis of 20-Minute Neighbourhood Policies and Practices in Melbourne and Scotland
author Chau, Hing-Wah
author_facet Chau, Hing-Wah
Gilzean, Ian
Jamei, Elmira
Palmer, Lesley
Preece, Terri
Quirke, Martin
author_role author
author2 Gilzean, Ian
Jamei, Elmira
Palmer, Lesley
Preece, Terri
Quirke, Martin
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chau, Hing-Wah
Gilzean, Ian
Jamei, Elmira
Palmer, Lesley
Preece, Terri
Quirke, Martin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv 20-minute neighbourhood; accessibility; active transport; age-friendly; Australia; climate change; Covid-19; liveability; Scotland; walkability
topic 20-minute neighbourhood; accessibility; active transport; age-friendly; Australia; climate change; Covid-19; liveability; Scotland; walkability
description Twenty-minute neighbourhoods highlight the importance of well-connected and mixed-used neighbourhoods and communities with proximate access to employment, essential services, public transport, and open spaces. Shorter distances together with re-prioritised public spaces encourage more active transport choices, resulting in public health benefits and reduced environmental pollution. Higher liveability brought about by mixed-use developments enables people to have equitable access to local facilities, amenities, and employment opportunities, promoting vibrancy, social cohesion, and intergenerational connections. The attributes of 20-minute neighbourhoods also combine to create places, that are acknowledged as friendly for all ages, address changing needs across the life course, and provide better support for the ageing population. Furthermore, there are indications that 20-minute neighbourhoods may be more resilient against many of the negative impacts of stringent public health protocols such as those implemented in periods of lockdown during the Covid-19 pandemic. In this article, we evaluate and compare planning policies and practices aimed at establishing 20-minute neighbourhoods in Melbourne (Australia) and Scotland (the UK). Using case studies, we discuss similarities and differences involved in using place-based approaches of 20-minute neighbourhoods to address 21st-century challenges in key areas of health and wellbeing, equity, environmental sustainability, and community resilience.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-10-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5668
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5668
url https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5668
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5668
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5668
https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v7i4.5668
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5668/5668
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Urban Planning; Vol 7, No 4 (2022): Healthy Cities: Effective Urban Planning Approaches to a Changing World; 13-24
2183-7635
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130665099198464