Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Haintz, Greer Lamaro
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: McKenzie, Hayley, Turnbull, Beth, Graham, Melissa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427
Resumo: Policy can be used and experienced as a tool for social inclusion or exclusion; it can empower or disenfranchise. Women’s reproductive decision‐making and health is impacted by policy, and women’s experiences of diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations can influence their experiences of policy. This research aimed to explore how intersectionality is considered within Victorian state government policies that influence and impact women’s reproductive decision-making. A systematic search of Victorian (Australia) government policy instruments was undertaken, identifying twenty policy instruments. Policies were analysed using an intersectional policy analysis framework using a two‐stage process involving deductive coding into the domains of the framework, followed by inductive thematic analysis within and across domains. Findings reveal inconsistencies within and across policies in how they consider intersecting social relations of power in the representation of problems, women’s positionings, policy impacts, and policy solutions. These gaps could exclude and marginalise individuals and groups and contribute to systemic inequities in women’s reproductive decision-making and the outcomes of those decisions, particularly among already marginalised groups. The lack of women’s voices in policy further excludes and marginalises those impacted by the policy and limits the representation of all women in policy. Policy development needs to meaningfully involve women with diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations, and critical reflexivity of all stakeholders, to ensure policies can better account for the experiences of, and impacts upon, women who are marginalised and effect change to promote social inclusion and equity in women’s reproductive decision‐making.
id RCAP_f4d13e7a2844b94855d6932d0f5ce702
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6427
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Makingintersectionality; policy analysis; reproductive decision‐making; social inclusion; womenPolicy can be used and experienced as a tool for social inclusion or exclusion; it can empower or disenfranchise. Women’s reproductive decision‐making and health is impacted by policy, and women’s experiences of diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations can influence their experiences of policy. This research aimed to explore how intersectionality is considered within Victorian state government policies that influence and impact women’s reproductive decision-making. A systematic search of Victorian (Australia) government policy instruments was undertaken, identifying twenty policy instruments. Policies were analysed using an intersectional policy analysis framework using a two‐stage process involving deductive coding into the domains of the framework, followed by inductive thematic analysis within and across domains. Findings reveal inconsistencies within and across policies in how they consider intersecting social relations of power in the representation of problems, women’s positionings, policy impacts, and policy solutions. These gaps could exclude and marginalise individuals and groups and contribute to systemic inequities in women’s reproductive decision-making and the outcomes of those decisions, particularly among already marginalised groups. The lack of women’s voices in policy further excludes and marginalises those impacted by the policy and limits the representation of all women in policy. Policy development needs to meaningfully involve women with diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations, and critical reflexivity of all stakeholders, to ensure policies can better account for the experiences of, and impacts upon, women who are marginalised and effect change to promote social inclusion and equity in women’s reproductive decision‐making.Cogitatio Press2023-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Effecting Systemic Change: Critical Strategic Approaches to Social Inclusion; 124-1352183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6427https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6427/6427Copyright (c) 2023 Greer Lamaro Haintz, Hayley McKenzie, Beth Turnbull, Melissa Grahaminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHaintz, Greer LamaroMcKenzie, HayleyTurnbull, BethGraham, Melissa2023-06-15T13:15:13Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6427Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:56:01.514094Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
title Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
spellingShingle Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
Haintz, Greer Lamaro
intersectionality; policy analysis; reproductive decision‐making; social inclusion; women
title_short Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
title_full Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
title_fullStr Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
title_full_unstemmed Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
title_sort Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
author Haintz, Greer Lamaro
author_facet Haintz, Greer Lamaro
McKenzie, Hayley
Turnbull, Beth
Graham, Melissa
author_role author
author2 McKenzie, Hayley
Turnbull, Beth
Graham, Melissa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Haintz, Greer Lamaro
McKenzie, Hayley
Turnbull, Beth
Graham, Melissa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv intersectionality; policy analysis; reproductive decision‐making; social inclusion; women
topic intersectionality; policy analysis; reproductive decision‐making; social inclusion; women
description Policy can be used and experienced as a tool for social inclusion or exclusion; it can empower or disenfranchise. Women’s reproductive decision‐making and health is impacted by policy, and women’s experiences of diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations can influence their experiences of policy. This research aimed to explore how intersectionality is considered within Victorian state government policies that influence and impact women’s reproductive decision-making. A systematic search of Victorian (Australia) government policy instruments was undertaken, identifying twenty policy instruments. Policies were analysed using an intersectional policy analysis framework using a two‐stage process involving deductive coding into the domains of the framework, followed by inductive thematic analysis within and across domains. Findings reveal inconsistencies within and across policies in how they consider intersecting social relations of power in the representation of problems, women’s positionings, policy impacts, and policy solutions. These gaps could exclude and marginalise individuals and groups and contribute to systemic inequities in women’s reproductive decision-making and the outcomes of those decisions, particularly among already marginalised groups. The lack of women’s voices in policy further excludes and marginalises those impacted by the policy and limits the representation of all women in policy. Policy development needs to meaningfully involve women with diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations, and critical reflexivity of all stakeholders, to ensure policies can better account for the experiences of, and impacts upon, women who are marginalised and effect change to promote social inclusion and equity in women’s reproductive decision‐making.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-05-25
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6427
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6427/6427
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Greer Lamaro Haintz, Hayley McKenzie, Beth Turnbull, Melissa Graham
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Greer Lamaro Haintz, Hayley McKenzie, Beth Turnbull, Melissa Graham
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Effecting Systemic Change: Critical Strategic Approaches to Social Inclusion; 124-135
2183-2803
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799131636105740288