Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427 |
Resumo: | Policy can be used and experienced as a tool for social inclusion or exclusion; it can empower or disenfranchise. Women’s reproductive decision‐making and health is impacted by policy, and women’s experiences of diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations can influence their experiences of policy. This research aimed to explore how intersectionality is considered within Victorian state government policies that influence and impact women’s reproductive decision-making. A systematic search of Victorian (Australia) government policy instruments was undertaken, identifying twenty policy instruments. Policies were analysed using an intersectional policy analysis framework using a two‐stage process involving deductive coding into the domains of the framework, followed by inductive thematic analysis within and across domains. Findings reveal inconsistencies within and across policies in how they consider intersecting social relations of power in the representation of problems, women’s positionings, policy impacts, and policy solutions. These gaps could exclude and marginalise individuals and groups and contribute to systemic inequities in women’s reproductive decision-making and the outcomes of those decisions, particularly among already marginalised groups. The lack of women’s voices in policy further excludes and marginalises those impacted by the policy and limits the representation of all women in policy. Policy development needs to meaningfully involve women with diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations, and critical reflexivity of all stakeholders, to ensure policies can better account for the experiences of, and impacts upon, women who are marginalised and effect change to promote social inclusion and equity in women’s reproductive decision‐making. |
id |
RCAP_f4d13e7a2844b94855d6932d0f5ce702 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6427 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Makingintersectionality; policy analysis; reproductive decision‐making; social inclusion; womenPolicy can be used and experienced as a tool for social inclusion or exclusion; it can empower or disenfranchise. Women’s reproductive decision‐making and health is impacted by policy, and women’s experiences of diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations can influence their experiences of policy. This research aimed to explore how intersectionality is considered within Victorian state government policies that influence and impact women’s reproductive decision-making. A systematic search of Victorian (Australia) government policy instruments was undertaken, identifying twenty policy instruments. Policies were analysed using an intersectional policy analysis framework using a two‐stage process involving deductive coding into the domains of the framework, followed by inductive thematic analysis within and across domains. Findings reveal inconsistencies within and across policies in how they consider intersecting social relations of power in the representation of problems, women’s positionings, policy impacts, and policy solutions. These gaps could exclude and marginalise individuals and groups and contribute to systemic inequities in women’s reproductive decision-making and the outcomes of those decisions, particularly among already marginalised groups. The lack of women’s voices in policy further excludes and marginalises those impacted by the policy and limits the representation of all women in policy. Policy development needs to meaningfully involve women with diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations, and critical reflexivity of all stakeholders, to ensure policies can better account for the experiences of, and impacts upon, women who are marginalised and effect change to promote social inclusion and equity in women’s reproductive decision‐making.Cogitatio Press2023-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Effecting Systemic Change: Critical Strategic Approaches to Social Inclusion; 124-1352183-2803reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6427https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6427/6427Copyright (c) 2023 Greer Lamaro Haintz, Hayley McKenzie, Beth Turnbull, Melissa Grahaminfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHaintz, Greer LamaroMcKenzie, HayleyTurnbull, BethGraham, Melissa2023-06-15T13:15:13Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/6427Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:56:01.514094Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making |
title |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making |
spellingShingle |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making Haintz, Greer Lamaro intersectionality; policy analysis; reproductive decision‐making; social inclusion; women |
title_short |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making |
title_full |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making |
title_fullStr |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making |
title_sort |
Inclusive Policy? An Intersectional Analysis of Policy Influencing Women’s Reproductive Decision‐Making |
author |
Haintz, Greer Lamaro |
author_facet |
Haintz, Greer Lamaro McKenzie, Hayley Turnbull, Beth Graham, Melissa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
McKenzie, Hayley Turnbull, Beth Graham, Melissa |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Haintz, Greer Lamaro McKenzie, Hayley Turnbull, Beth Graham, Melissa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
intersectionality; policy analysis; reproductive decision‐making; social inclusion; women |
topic |
intersectionality; policy analysis; reproductive decision‐making; social inclusion; women |
description |
Policy can be used and experienced as a tool for social inclusion or exclusion; it can empower or disenfranchise. Women’s reproductive decision‐making and health is impacted by policy, and women’s experiences of diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations can influence their experiences of policy. This research aimed to explore how intersectionality is considered within Victorian state government policies that influence and impact women’s reproductive decision-making. A systematic search of Victorian (Australia) government policy instruments was undertaken, identifying twenty policy instruments. Policies were analysed using an intersectional policy analysis framework using a two‐stage process involving deductive coding into the domains of the framework, followed by inductive thematic analysis within and across domains. Findings reveal inconsistencies within and across policies in how they consider intersecting social relations of power in the representation of problems, women’s positionings, policy impacts, and policy solutions. These gaps could exclude and marginalise individuals and groups and contribute to systemic inequities in women’s reproductive decision-making and the outcomes of those decisions, particularly among already marginalised groups. The lack of women’s voices in policy further excludes and marginalises those impacted by the policy and limits the representation of all women in policy. Policy development needs to meaningfully involve women with diverse and intersecting marginalised social locations, and critical reflexivity of all stakeholders, to ensure policies can better account for the experiences of, and impacts upon, women who are marginalised and effect change to promote social inclusion and equity in women’s reproductive decision‐making. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-05-25 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v11i2.6427 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6427 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/6427/6427 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Greer Lamaro Haintz, Hayley McKenzie, Beth Turnbull, Melissa Graham info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Greer Lamaro Haintz, Hayley McKenzie, Beth Turnbull, Melissa Graham |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 11, No 2 (2023): Effecting Systemic Change: Critical Strategic Approaches to Social Inclusion; 124-135 2183-2803 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131636105740288 |