No historian worthy of the name is only an historian
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n6.22481 |
Resumo: | This essay discusses an almost forgotten text by Hayden White: a 1959 book review published in the journal Speculum. The brief text offers an interesting glimpse on the medieval historian that was White in 1959 – though one who clearly was on his way of becoming a historical theorist. At the same time, the review raises a number of questions with which historians still find themselves struggling. What are the moral interventions that historians make through their books and articles? And is it true, as White memorably put it, that “no historian worthy of the name is only an historian”? |
id |
RCAP_f62a585a1aaac3d4a91c6a92cc8e60c4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22481 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historianNenhum historiador digno desse nome é apenas um historiadorHayden WhiteLouis LekaiChristopher Dawsonhistoria e éticaHayden WhiteLouis LekaiChristopher Dawsonhistory and ethicsThis essay discusses an almost forgotten text by Hayden White: a 1959 book review published in the journal Speculum. The brief text offers an interesting glimpse on the medieval historian that was White in 1959 – though one who clearly was on his way of becoming a historical theorist. At the same time, the review raises a number of questions with which historians still find themselves struggling. What are the moral interventions that historians make through their books and articles? And is it true, as White memorably put it, that “no historian worthy of the name is only an historian”?Este ensaio debruça-se sobre um texto quase esquecido de Hayden White: uma recensão publicada em 1959 na revista Speculum. Este breve texto oferece um interessante vislumbre do medievalista que White ainda era em 1959, embora já a caminho de se tornar um especialista em teoria da história. Simultaneamente, a recensão levanta um conjunto de questões com que os historiadores ainda se deparam hoje em dia. Que intervenções morais faz o historiador através dos seus livros e artigos? E será verdade que, nas palavras de White, “nenhum historiador digno desse nome é apenas um historiador”?Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa2021-01-21info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n6.22481https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n6.22481Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; No. 6 (2018); 15-22Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; N.º 6 (2018); 15-222183-590Xreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttps://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22481https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22481/16573Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Pastinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPaul, Herman2023-04-15T05:23:16Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/22481Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:49:20.709675Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historian Nenhum historiador digno desse nome é apenas um historiador |
title |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historian |
spellingShingle |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historian Paul, Herman Hayden White Louis Lekai Christopher Dawson historia e ética Hayden White Louis Lekai Christopher Dawson history and ethics |
title_short |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historian |
title_full |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historian |
title_fullStr |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historian |
title_full_unstemmed |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historian |
title_sort |
No historian worthy of the name is only an historian |
author |
Paul, Herman |
author_facet |
Paul, Herman |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paul, Herman |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hayden White Louis Lekai Christopher Dawson historia e ética Hayden White Louis Lekai Christopher Dawson history and ethics |
topic |
Hayden White Louis Lekai Christopher Dawson historia e ética Hayden White Louis Lekai Christopher Dawson history and ethics |
description |
This essay discusses an almost forgotten text by Hayden White: a 1959 book review published in the journal Speculum. The brief text offers an interesting glimpse on the medieval historian that was White in 1959 – though one who clearly was on his way of becoming a historical theorist. At the same time, the review raises a number of questions with which historians still find themselves struggling. What are the moral interventions that historians make through their books and articles? And is it true, as White memorably put it, that “no historian worthy of the name is only an historian”? |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-21 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n6.22481 https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n6.22481 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.48487/pdh.2018.n6.22481 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22481 https://praticasdahistoria.pt/article/view/22481/16573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade NOVA de Lisboa |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; No. 6 (2018); 15-22 Práticas da História. Journal on Theory, Historiography and Uses of the Past; N.º 6 (2018); 15-22 2183-590X reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131574541746176 |