Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4026 |
Resumo: | Objective: To evaluate the content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites in the United States of America. Methods: We obtained a list of accredited 104 Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Electronic Residency Application Service. Individual Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were then evaluated on 14 different criteria. We grouped fellowship programs based on census region and Electronic Residency Application Service participation status, and analyzed the differences using nonparametric statistics. Results: A total of 104 accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were evaluated for a total of 14 different criteria. Of the 14 different criteria, an average of 3.94 were described in each website. Number of Fellowship positions per year (71.8%), clinical rotations during the program (65.1%), and faculty background (62.2%) were the most frequently described features on the websites. Night call responsibilities (3.9%), meal allowance (7.8%) and parking availability (10.7%) were the least described features in the websites. There were no significant differences between program websites when grouped by census regions or the participation status in the Electronic Residency Applications Service. Conclusion: The content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites is extremely variable across the United States of America. This study indicates that there is room for improvement and enhancement of the comprehensiveness of website content for the majority of the programs analyzed. Additionally, this study also emphasizes the importance of having accurate and easily available online information in a post-pandemic era, when prospective fellows evaluate programs online through their websites. |
id |
RCAP_f8cf8cdf76964b0d256189798b9853d4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/4026 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different CriteriaCHLC MFRACGMEERASApplicationFellowship ProgramPain MedicineWebsiteObjective: To evaluate the content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites in the United States of America. Methods: We obtained a list of accredited 104 Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Electronic Residency Application Service. Individual Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were then evaluated on 14 different criteria. We grouped fellowship programs based on census region and Electronic Residency Application Service participation status, and analyzed the differences using nonparametric statistics. Results: A total of 104 accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were evaluated for a total of 14 different criteria. Of the 14 different criteria, an average of 3.94 were described in each website. Number of Fellowship positions per year (71.8%), clinical rotations during the program (65.1%), and faculty background (62.2%) were the most frequently described features on the websites. Night call responsibilities (3.9%), meal allowance (7.8%) and parking availability (10.7%) were the least described features in the websites. There were no significant differences between program websites when grouped by census regions or the participation status in the Electronic Residency Applications Service. Conclusion: The content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites is extremely variable across the United States of America. This study indicates that there is room for improvement and enhancement of the comprehensiveness of website content for the majority of the programs analyzed. Additionally, this study also emphasizes the importance of having accurate and easily available online information in a post-pandemic era, when prospective fellows evaluate programs online through their websites.Dove PressRepositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPEGupta, SPalmer, SFerreira-dos-Santos, G2022-03-31T11:01:27Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4026engJ Pain Res. 2021 May 21;14:1339-1343.10.2147/JPR.S313513.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-10T09:44:59Zoai:repositorio.chlc.min-saude.pt:10400.17/4026Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T17:21:20.101750Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria |
title |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria |
spellingShingle |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria Gupta, S CHLC MFR ACGME ERAS Application Fellowship Program Pain Medicine Website |
title_short |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria |
title_full |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria |
title_fullStr |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria |
title_sort |
Pain Medicine Fellowship Program Websites in the United States of America - A Nonparametric Statistic Analysis of 14 Different Criteria |
author |
Gupta, S |
author_facet |
Gupta, S Palmer, S Ferreira-dos-Santos, G |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Palmer, S Ferreira-dos-Santos, G |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório do Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, EPE |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gupta, S Palmer, S Ferreira-dos-Santos, G |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
CHLC MFR ACGME ERAS Application Fellowship Program Pain Medicine Website |
topic |
CHLC MFR ACGME ERAS Application Fellowship Program Pain Medicine Website |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites in the United States of America. Methods: We obtained a list of accredited 104 Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Electronic Residency Application Service. Individual Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were then evaluated on 14 different criteria. We grouped fellowship programs based on census region and Electronic Residency Application Service participation status, and analyzed the differences using nonparametric statistics. Results: A total of 104 accredited Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites were evaluated for a total of 14 different criteria. Of the 14 different criteria, an average of 3.94 were described in each website. Number of Fellowship positions per year (71.8%), clinical rotations during the program (65.1%), and faculty background (62.2%) were the most frequently described features on the websites. Night call responsibilities (3.9%), meal allowance (7.8%) and parking availability (10.7%) were the least described features in the websites. There were no significant differences between program websites when grouped by census regions or the participation status in the Electronic Residency Applications Service. Conclusion: The content of Pain Medicine Fellowship Program websites is extremely variable across the United States of America. This study indicates that there is room for improvement and enhancement of the comprehensiveness of website content for the majority of the programs analyzed. Additionally, this study also emphasizes the importance of having accurate and easily available online information in a post-pandemic era, when prospective fellows evaluate programs online through their websites. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z 2022-03-31T11:01:27Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4026 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4026 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
J Pain Res. 2021 May 21;14:1339-1343. 10.2147/JPR.S313513. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dove Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Dove Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799131309289766912 |