Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Maciel Barbosa, Jorge
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Tralhão, José Guilherme, Botelho, Maria Filomena, Nunes Santos, Jorge, Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo, Abrantes, Ana Margarida, Gomes Carrapita, Jorge Humberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/101507
https://doi.org/10.21614/sgo-25-3-113
Resumo: Aim of the study: To systematically review the evidence regarding the association between portal venous pressure (PVP) after hepatectomy and posthepatectomy liver failure (PLHF) or other postsurgical outcomes. Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for studies assessing post-hepatectomy PVP (or its variation) and reporting its association with PHLF or other postsurgical outcomes. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis for the association between development of PHLF and post-hepatectomy PVP and its variation. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q-Cochran test and I2 statistic. Quality assessment was performed considering ROBINS-1 Cochrane tool. Results: Four studies, assessing 439 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. The meta-analyses, including 3 studies, demonstrated that patients developing PHLF did not have a significantly higher post-hepatectomy PVP when compared to the remainder (1.98; 95%CI=-1.44-5.39; p=0.256; I2=2%), but had a significantly higher PVP variation (increase) during hepatectomy (1.65; 95%CI=1.15-2.15; p<0.001; I2=0%). The quality of the studies allowed to consider the robustness of the conclusions as “median”. Conclusions: An increased PVP variation following hepatectomy associates with a higher risk of PHLF, but the same was not observed for the absolute value of post-hepatectomy PVP.
id RCAP_f9ebf149547df7a6a52d52018bb54364
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/101507
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysishepatobiliary surgeryliverportal venous pressureportal inflow modulationposthepatectomy liver failuremeta-analysisAim of the study: To systematically review the evidence regarding the association between portal venous pressure (PVP) after hepatectomy and posthepatectomy liver failure (PLHF) or other postsurgical outcomes. Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for studies assessing post-hepatectomy PVP (or its variation) and reporting its association with PHLF or other postsurgical outcomes. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis for the association between development of PHLF and post-hepatectomy PVP and its variation. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q-Cochran test and I2 statistic. Quality assessment was performed considering ROBINS-1 Cochrane tool. Results: Four studies, assessing 439 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. The meta-analyses, including 3 studies, demonstrated that patients developing PHLF did not have a significantly higher post-hepatectomy PVP when compared to the remainder (1.98; 95%CI=-1.44-5.39; p=0.256; I2=2%), but had a significantly higher PVP variation (increase) during hepatectomy (1.65; 95%CI=1.15-2.15; p<0.001; I2=0%). The quality of the studies allowed to consider the robustness of the conclusions as “median”. Conclusions: An increased PVP variation following hepatectomy associates with a higher risk of PHLF, but the same was not observed for the absolute value of post-hepatectomy PVP.2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/101507http://hdl.handle.net/10316/101507https://doi.org/10.21614/sgo-25-3-113eng2559-723XMaciel Barbosa, JorgeTralhão, José GuilhermeBotelho, Maria FilomenaNunes Santos, JorgeSousa-Pinto, BernardoAbrantes, Ana MargaridaGomes Carrapita, Jorge Humbertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2022-08-29T20:39:50Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/101507Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T21:18:41.124072Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
spellingShingle Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Maciel Barbosa, Jorge
hepatobiliary surgery
liver
portal venous pressure
portal inflow modulation
posthepatectomy liver failure
meta-analysis
title_short Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort Portal Pressure Impact on Clinical Outcome after Major Hepatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
author Maciel Barbosa, Jorge
author_facet Maciel Barbosa, Jorge
Tralhão, José Guilherme
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Nunes Santos, Jorge
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
Abrantes, Ana Margarida
Gomes Carrapita, Jorge Humberto
author_role author
author2 Tralhão, José Guilherme
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Nunes Santos, Jorge
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
Abrantes, Ana Margarida
Gomes Carrapita, Jorge Humberto
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maciel Barbosa, Jorge
Tralhão, José Guilherme
Botelho, Maria Filomena
Nunes Santos, Jorge
Sousa-Pinto, Bernardo
Abrantes, Ana Margarida
Gomes Carrapita, Jorge Humberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv hepatobiliary surgery
liver
portal venous pressure
portal inflow modulation
posthepatectomy liver failure
meta-analysis
topic hepatobiliary surgery
liver
portal venous pressure
portal inflow modulation
posthepatectomy liver failure
meta-analysis
description Aim of the study: To systematically review the evidence regarding the association between portal venous pressure (PVP) after hepatectomy and posthepatectomy liver failure (PLHF) or other postsurgical outcomes. Materials and methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science for studies assessing post-hepatectomy PVP (or its variation) and reporting its association with PHLF or other postsurgical outcomes. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis for the association between development of PHLF and post-hepatectomy PVP and its variation. Heterogeneity was assessed using Q-Cochran test and I2 statistic. Quality assessment was performed considering ROBINS-1 Cochrane tool. Results: Four studies, assessing 439 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were included in this systematic review. The meta-analyses, including 3 studies, demonstrated that patients developing PHLF did not have a significantly higher post-hepatectomy PVP when compared to the remainder (1.98; 95%CI=-1.44-5.39; p=0.256; I2=2%), but had a significantly higher PVP variation (increase) during hepatectomy (1.65; 95%CI=1.15-2.15; p<0.001; I2=0%). The quality of the studies allowed to consider the robustness of the conclusions as “median”. Conclusions: An increased PVP variation following hepatectomy associates with a higher risk of PHLF, but the same was not observed for the absolute value of post-hepatectomy PVP.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/101507
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/101507
https://doi.org/10.21614/sgo-25-3-113
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/101507
https://doi.org/10.21614/sgo-25-3-113
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2559-723X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134081056768000