Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nacif, Lucas S.
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Zanini, Leonardo Y., Pinheiro, Rafael S., Waisberg, Daniel R., Rocha-Santos, Vinicius, Andraus, Wellington, Carrilho, Flair J., Carneiro-D’Albuquerque, Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191791
Resumo: Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of PVT in LT outcomes and analyze the types of surgical techniques used for dealing with PVT during LT. A systematic review was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, selecting articles from January 1990 to December 2019. The MESH-terms used were (‘‘Portal Vein’’[Mesh] AND ‘‘Thrombosis’’[Mesh] NOT ‘‘Neoplasms’’[Mesh]) AND (‘‘Liver Transplantation’’[Mesh]). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendation was used, and meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager Version 5.3 software. A total of 1,638 articles were initially found: 488 in PubMed, 289 in Cochrane Library, and 861 in EMBASE, from which 27 were eventually selected for the meta-analysis. Surgery time of LT in patients with PVT was longer than in patients without LT (po0.0001). Intraoperative red blood cell (po0.00001), fresh frozen plasma (p=0.01), and platelets (p=0.03) transfusions during LT were higher in patients with PVT. One-year (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; p=0.002) and 5-year (OR 1.12; p=0.01) patient survival after LT was worse in the PVT group. Total occlusive PVT presented higher mortality (OR 3.70; p=0.00009) and rethrombosis rates (OR 3.47 [1.18–10.21]; p=0.02). PVT Yerdel III/IV classification exhibited worse 1-year [2.04 (1.21–3.42); p=0.007] and 5-year [0.98 (0.59–1.62); p=0.93] patient survival. Thrombectomy with primary anastomosis was associated with better outcomes. LT in patients with non-tumoral PVT demands more surgical time, needs more intraoperative transfusion, and presents worse 1- and 5-year patient survival. Total occlusive PVT and Yerdel III/IV PVT classification were associated with higher mortality. (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42020132915).
id USP-19_0b077c6caf475643287ab45ecde73918
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/191791
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisLiver TransplantationPortal Vein ThrombosisSystematic ReviewPortal VeinCirrhoticLiver DiseaseNon-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of PVT in LT outcomes and analyze the types of surgical techniques used for dealing with PVT during LT. A systematic review was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, selecting articles from January 1990 to December 2019. The MESH-terms used were (‘‘Portal Vein’’[Mesh] AND ‘‘Thrombosis’’[Mesh] NOT ‘‘Neoplasms’’[Mesh]) AND (‘‘Liver Transplantation’’[Mesh]). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendation was used, and meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager Version 5.3 software. A total of 1,638 articles were initially found: 488 in PubMed, 289 in Cochrane Library, and 861 in EMBASE, from which 27 were eventually selected for the meta-analysis. Surgery time of LT in patients with PVT was longer than in patients without LT (po0.0001). Intraoperative red blood cell (po0.00001), fresh frozen plasma (p=0.01), and platelets (p=0.03) transfusions during LT were higher in patients with PVT. One-year (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; p=0.002) and 5-year (OR 1.12; p=0.01) patient survival after LT was worse in the PVT group. Total occlusive PVT presented higher mortality (OR 3.70; p=0.00009) and rethrombosis rates (OR 3.47 [1.18–10.21]; p=0.02). PVT Yerdel III/IV classification exhibited worse 1-year [2.04 (1.21–3.42); p=0.007] and 5-year [0.98 (0.59–1.62); p=0.93] patient survival. Thrombectomy with primary anastomosis was associated with better outcomes. LT in patients with non-tumoral PVT demands more surgical time, needs more intraoperative transfusion, and presents worse 1- and 5-year patient survival. Total occlusive PVT and Yerdel III/IV PVT classification were associated with higher mortality. (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42020132915).Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2021-11-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19179110.6061/clinics/2021/e2184Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2184Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2184Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e21841980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191791/176701Copyright (c) 2021 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNacif, Lucas S. Zanini, Leonardo Y. Pinheiro, Rafael S. Waisberg, Daniel R. Rocha-Santos, Vinicius Andraus, Wellington Carrilho, Flair J. Carneiro-D’Albuquerque, Luiz 2023-07-06T13:04:09Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/191791Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:04:09Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
spellingShingle Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Nacif, Lucas S.
Liver Transplantation
Portal Vein Thrombosis
Systematic Review
Portal Vein
Cirrhotic
Liver Disease
title_short Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
author Nacif, Lucas S.
author_facet Nacif, Lucas S.
Zanini, Leonardo Y.
Pinheiro, Rafael S.
Waisberg, Daniel R.
Rocha-Santos, Vinicius
Andraus, Wellington
Carrilho, Flair J.
Carneiro-D’Albuquerque, Luiz
author_role author
author2 Zanini, Leonardo Y.
Pinheiro, Rafael S.
Waisberg, Daniel R.
Rocha-Santos, Vinicius
Andraus, Wellington
Carrilho, Flair J.
Carneiro-D’Albuquerque, Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nacif, Lucas S.
Zanini, Leonardo Y.
Pinheiro, Rafael S.
Waisberg, Daniel R.
Rocha-Santos, Vinicius
Andraus, Wellington
Carrilho, Flair J.
Carneiro-D’Albuquerque, Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Liver Transplantation
Portal Vein Thrombosis
Systematic Review
Portal Vein
Cirrhotic
Liver Disease
topic Liver Transplantation
Portal Vein Thrombosis
Systematic Review
Portal Vein
Cirrhotic
Liver Disease
description Non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in liver transplantation (LT). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of PVT in LT outcomes and analyze the types of surgical techniques used for dealing with PVT during LT. A systematic review was conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, selecting articles from January 1990 to December 2019. The MESH-terms used were (‘‘Portal Vein’’[Mesh] AND ‘‘Thrombosis’’[Mesh] NOT ‘‘Neoplasms’’[Mesh]) AND (‘‘Liver Transplantation’’[Mesh]). The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) recommendation was used, and meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager Version 5.3 software. A total of 1,638 articles were initially found: 488 in PubMed, 289 in Cochrane Library, and 861 in EMBASE, from which 27 were eventually selected for the meta-analysis. Surgery time of LT in patients with PVT was longer than in patients without LT (po0.0001). Intraoperative red blood cell (po0.00001), fresh frozen plasma (p=0.01), and platelets (p=0.03) transfusions during LT were higher in patients with PVT. One-year (odds ratio [OR] 1.17; p=0.002) and 5-year (OR 1.12; p=0.01) patient survival after LT was worse in the PVT group. Total occlusive PVT presented higher mortality (OR 3.70; p=0.00009) and rethrombosis rates (OR 3.47 [1.18–10.21]; p=0.02). PVT Yerdel III/IV classification exhibited worse 1-year [2.04 (1.21–3.42); p=0.007] and 5-year [0.98 (0.59–1.62); p=0.93] patient survival. Thrombectomy with primary anastomosis was associated with better outcomes. LT in patients with non-tumoral PVT demands more surgical time, needs more intraoperative transfusion, and presents worse 1- and 5-year patient survival. Total occlusive PVT and Yerdel III/IV PVT classification were associated with higher mortality. (PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42020132915).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191791
10.6061/clinics/2021/e2184
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191791
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2184
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191791/176701
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2184
Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2184
Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2184
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222765612007424