‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Castro, P.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Mouro, C.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12182
Resumo: This article examines how residents in Natura 2000 sites in Southern Portugal ‘imagine themselves’ as publics participating in biodiversity conservation. Through nine focus groups (n = 49) it seeks to understand whether and how these self-imaginations reproduce and/or resist experts’ highly shared, hegemonic, representations across two dimensions: the epistemic and the normative. Analysis of the groups’ discussions shows that (1) reproduction is clearer in the normative dimension, conveyed through discursive formats that place ‘people’ as its actor and exempt the Ego from it; (2) resistance is clearer in the epistemic dimension, relying on vibrant claims of local knowledge, yet it can be maintained as hidden discourse; (3) the forms of reproduction or resistance that emerged were hybrid ones; and (4) self-imaginations are more fragmented and negative in normative matters and more unified and positive in epistemic matters. We discuss how these findings help understand how hegemonic representations are maintained/resisted in enduring public–expert relations.
id RCAP_f9f2dcdc1bbc94579594366bff253378
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12182
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservationHegemonyInteraction experts/publicsLay expertisePublic participationResistanceSocial representationsThis article examines how residents in Natura 2000 sites in Southern Portugal ‘imagine themselves’ as publics participating in biodiversity conservation. Through nine focus groups (n = 49) it seeks to understand whether and how these self-imaginations reproduce and/or resist experts’ highly shared, hegemonic, representations across two dimensions: the epistemic and the normative. Analysis of the groups’ discussions shows that (1) reproduction is clearer in the normative dimension, conveyed through discursive formats that place ‘people’ as its actor and exempt the Ego from it; (2) resistance is clearer in the epistemic dimension, relying on vibrant claims of local knowledge, yet it can be maintained as hidden discourse; (3) the forms of reproduction or resistance that emerged were hybrid ones; and (4) self-imaginations are more fragmented and negative in normative matters and more unified and positive in epistemic matters. We discuss how these findings help understand how hegemonic representations are maintained/resisted in enduring public–expert relations.SAGE Publications2016-12-07T12:20:19Z2016-01-01T00:00:00Z20162019-04-09T12:20:01Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10071/12182eng0963-662510.1177/0963662515581303Castro, P.Mouro, C.info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-11-09T18:01:46Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/12182Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T22:33:07.965494Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation
title ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation
spellingShingle ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation
Castro, P.
Hegemony
Interaction experts/publics
Lay expertise
Public participation
Resistance
Social representations
title_short ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation
title_full ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation
title_fullStr ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation
title_full_unstemmed ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation
title_sort ‘Imagining ourselves’ as participating publics: an example from biodiversity conservation
author Castro, P.
author_facet Castro, P.
Mouro, C.
author_role author
author2 Mouro, C.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Castro, P.
Mouro, C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hegemony
Interaction experts/publics
Lay expertise
Public participation
Resistance
Social representations
topic Hegemony
Interaction experts/publics
Lay expertise
Public participation
Resistance
Social representations
description This article examines how residents in Natura 2000 sites in Southern Portugal ‘imagine themselves’ as publics participating in biodiversity conservation. Through nine focus groups (n = 49) it seeks to understand whether and how these self-imaginations reproduce and/or resist experts’ highly shared, hegemonic, representations across two dimensions: the epistemic and the normative. Analysis of the groups’ discussions shows that (1) reproduction is clearer in the normative dimension, conveyed through discursive formats that place ‘people’ as its actor and exempt the Ego from it; (2) resistance is clearer in the epistemic dimension, relying on vibrant claims of local knowledge, yet it can be maintained as hidden discourse; (3) the forms of reproduction or resistance that emerged were hybrid ones; and (4) self-imaginations are more fragmented and negative in normative matters and more unified and positive in epistemic matters. We discuss how these findings help understand how hegemonic representations are maintained/resisted in enduring public–expert relations.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-07T12:20:19Z
2016-01-01T00:00:00Z
2016
2019-04-09T12:20:01Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12182
url http://hdl.handle.net/10071/12182
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 0963-6625
10.1177/0963662515581303
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv SAGE Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799134892908347392