Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moreira, J. António
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Ferreira, António Gomes, Almeida, Ana Cristina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/46349
https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.2.50
Resumo: The purpose of this study was to report evidence obtained in a survey based on the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 1991
id RCAP_fa133374095b401650b47cec6e885df3
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/46349
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?Blended LearningCommunity of InquiryLearning CommunityOnline LearningPolytechnic; UniversityThe purpose of this study was to report evidence obtained in a survey based on the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 19912000) carried out in different groups. The study comprised 510 higher education students enrolled in blended online courses offered through Moodle platform during one semester. It considered students from different private and public Portuguese polytechnic schools and universities. Moreira & Almeida (2011) have suggested that CoI framework is a valid, reliable, and efficient measure of its dimensions within the Portuguese population. Although similarities in aspects of social presence were discovered among polytechnic and universities students, the two groups showed some differences. In particular, it was observed that the polytechnic students appear to be a more robust community when compared to university students.2013info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/46349http://hdl.handle.net/10316/46349https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.2.50eng2304-070XMoreira, J. AntónioFerreira, António GomesAlmeida, Ana Cristinainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2020-05-27T16:14:43Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/46349Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:50:01.828427Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?
title Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?
spellingShingle Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?
Moreira, J. António
Blended Learning
Community of Inquiry
Learning Community
Online Learning
Polytechnic; University
title_short Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?
title_full Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?
title_fullStr Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?
title_full_unstemmed Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?
title_sort Comparing communities of inquiry in higher education students: one for all or one for each?
author Moreira, J. António
author_facet Moreira, J. António
Ferreira, António Gomes
Almeida, Ana Cristina
author_role author
author2 Ferreira, António Gomes
Almeida, Ana Cristina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moreira, J. António
Ferreira, António Gomes
Almeida, Ana Cristina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Blended Learning
Community of Inquiry
Learning Community
Online Learning
Polytechnic; University
topic Blended Learning
Community of Inquiry
Learning Community
Online Learning
Polytechnic; University
description The purpose of this study was to report evidence obtained in a survey based on the Community of Inquiry (CoI) framework (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 1991
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/46349
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/46349
https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.2.50
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/46349
https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.2.50
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2304-070X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799133781745991680

Registros relacionados