Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77621 |
Resumo: | False memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm are explained in terms of the interplay between error-inflating and error-editing (e.g., monitoring) mechanisms. In this study, we focused on disqualifying monitoring, a decision process that helps to reject false memories through the recollection of collateral information (i.e., recall-to-reject strategies). Participants engage in recall-to-reject strategies using one or two metacognitive processes: (1) applying the logic of mutual exclusivity or (2) experiencing feelings of contrast between studied items and unstudied lures. We aimed to provide, for the first time in the DRM literature, evidence favorable to the existence of a recall-to-reject strategy based on the experience of feelings of contrast. One hundred and forty participants studied six-word DRM lists (e.g., spy, hell, fist, fight, abduction, mortal), simultaneously associated with three critical lures (e.g., WAR, BAD, FEAR). Lists differed in their ease to identify their critical lures (extremely low-BAS lists vs. high-BAS lists). At recognition test, participants saw either one or the three critical lures of the lists. Participants in the three-critical-lure condition were expected to increase their monitoring, as they would experience stronger feelings of contrast than the participants in the one-critical-lure condition. Results supported our hypothesis, showing lower false recognition in the three-critical-lure condition than in the one critical-lure condition. Critically, in the three-critical-lure condition, participants reduced even more false memory when they could also resort to another monitoring strategy (i.e., identify-to-reject). These findings suggest that, in the DRM context, disqualifying monitoring could be guided by experiencing feelings of contrast between different types of words. |
id |
RCAP_fa84ecabc7d987efee82bfea96186f84 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/77621 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigmfalse memoriesfalse recognitionDRM paradigmdisqualifying monitoringmemory error-editing processesmultiple critical lures per listbackward associative strengthCiências Sociais::PsicologiaSocial SciencesEducação de qualidadeFalse memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm are explained in terms of the interplay between error-inflating and error-editing (e.g., monitoring) mechanisms. In this study, we focused on disqualifying monitoring, a decision process that helps to reject false memories through the recollection of collateral information (i.e., recall-to-reject strategies). Participants engage in recall-to-reject strategies using one or two metacognitive processes: (1) applying the logic of mutual exclusivity or (2) experiencing feelings of contrast between studied items and unstudied lures. We aimed to provide, for the first time in the DRM literature, evidence favorable to the existence of a recall-to-reject strategy based on the experience of feelings of contrast. One hundred and forty participants studied six-word DRM lists (e.g., spy, hell, fist, fight, abduction, mortal), simultaneously associated with three critical lures (e.g., WAR, BAD, FEAR). Lists differed in their ease to identify their critical lures (extremely low-BAS lists vs. high-BAS lists). At recognition test, participants saw either one or the three critical lures of the lists. Participants in the three-critical-lure condition were expected to increase their monitoring, as they would experience stronger feelings of contrast than the participants in the one-critical-lure condition. Results supported our hypothesis, showing lower false recognition in the three-critical-lure condition than in the one critical-lure condition. Critically, in the three-critical-lure condition, participants reduced even more false memory when they could also resort to another monitoring strategy (i.e., identify-to-reject). These findings suggest that, in the DRM context, disqualifying monitoring could be guided by experiencing feelings of contrast between different types of words.This work was partially supported by grant SA052G18, Junta de Castilla y Leon, by the University of Salamanca (Spain), and by Support scholarships for doctoral students (Becas de apoyo para estudiantes doctorales) from the Universidad del Rosario (Colombia).Frontiers MediaUniversidade do MinhoCadavid, SaraBeato, Maria SoledadSuarez, MarAlbuquerque, Pedro Barbas20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/77621engCadavid, S., Beato, M. S., Suarez, M., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2021). Feelings of Contrast at Test Reduce False Memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm. [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.6863901664-107810.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-07-21T12:33:42Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/77621Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T19:29:15.858903Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm |
title |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm |
spellingShingle |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm Cadavid, Sara false memories false recognition DRM paradigm disqualifying monitoring memory error-editing processes multiple critical lures per list backward associative strength Ciências Sociais::Psicologia Social Sciences Educação de qualidade |
title_short |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm |
title_full |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm |
title_fullStr |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm |
title_full_unstemmed |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm |
title_sort |
Feelings of contrast at test reduce false memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm |
author |
Cadavid, Sara |
author_facet |
Cadavid, Sara Beato, Maria Soledad Suarez, Mar Albuquerque, Pedro Barbas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Beato, Maria Soledad Suarez, Mar Albuquerque, Pedro Barbas |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Minho |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cadavid, Sara Beato, Maria Soledad Suarez, Mar Albuquerque, Pedro Barbas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
false memories false recognition DRM paradigm disqualifying monitoring memory error-editing processes multiple critical lures per list backward associative strength Ciências Sociais::Psicologia Social Sciences Educação de qualidade |
topic |
false memories false recognition DRM paradigm disqualifying monitoring memory error-editing processes multiple critical lures per list backward associative strength Ciências Sociais::Psicologia Social Sciences Educação de qualidade |
description |
False memories in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm are explained in terms of the interplay between error-inflating and error-editing (e.g., monitoring) mechanisms. In this study, we focused on disqualifying monitoring, a decision process that helps to reject false memories through the recollection of collateral information (i.e., recall-to-reject strategies). Participants engage in recall-to-reject strategies using one or two metacognitive processes: (1) applying the logic of mutual exclusivity or (2) experiencing feelings of contrast between studied items and unstudied lures. We aimed to provide, for the first time in the DRM literature, evidence favorable to the existence of a recall-to-reject strategy based on the experience of feelings of contrast. One hundred and forty participants studied six-word DRM lists (e.g., spy, hell, fist, fight, abduction, mortal), simultaneously associated with three critical lures (e.g., WAR, BAD, FEAR). Lists differed in their ease to identify their critical lures (extremely low-BAS lists vs. high-BAS lists). At recognition test, participants saw either one or the three critical lures of the lists. Participants in the three-critical-lure condition were expected to increase their monitoring, as they would experience stronger feelings of contrast than the participants in the one-critical-lure condition. Results supported our hypothesis, showing lower false recognition in the three-critical-lure condition than in the one critical-lure condition. Critically, in the three-critical-lure condition, participants reduced even more false memory when they could also resort to another monitoring strategy (i.e., identify-to-reject). These findings suggest that, in the DRM context, disqualifying monitoring could be guided by experiencing feelings of contrast between different types of words. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021 2021-01-01T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77621 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/77621 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadavid, S., Beato, M. S., Suarez, M., & Albuquerque, P. B. (2021). Feelings of Contrast at Test Reduce False Memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm. [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390 1664-1078 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390/full |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799132791777001472 |