Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fonseca, Carolina
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Luz, Helena, Cândida Melo, Rosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200
Resumo: Objective: Identify the perception of professionals regarding the benefits and difficulties of implementing the Methodology of Care Humanitude (MCH) in Residential homes for older people care practice. Method: This is an exploratory and descriptive study of a qualitative nature, covering a sample of three interlocutors with experience in the formation and implementation of MCH. Data collection was carried out through a mixed questionnaire, with open questions being interpreted using the content analysis technique. Results: The benefits of MCH relate to the people cared for (e.g., increased acceptance of care), to formal caregivers/collaborators (e.g., reduced absenteeism), as well as to the organizational system (changing the culture of care). The challenges arise internally (e.g., appropriation of techniques, resistance to change) and externally (e.g., training of professionals, organization of care focused on the task). Conclusions: MCH is an approach centered on interaction with the person being cared for, with benefits that span the entire organizational context. Its implementation translates opportunities for the daily practice of care, encompassing the people cared for and the teams providing care, influencing the organizational context. MCH represents a change in the care paradigm; however, there are several challenges to its implementation in practice, which suggests that greater involvement of all care interlocutors is suggested, namely the formal leaders of institutions and agents of public policies.
id RCAP_faff2464b6784d69e59577e134bcfb02
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rpics.ismt.pt:article/200
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practiceMetodologia de Cuidado Humanitude: Benefícios e desafios da sua implementação na práticaCareCaregiversOlder adultsHumanitudeQualitative studyCuidadosCuidadoresHumanitudePessoas idosasEstudo qualitativoObjective: Identify the perception of professionals regarding the benefits and difficulties of implementing the Methodology of Care Humanitude (MCH) in Residential homes for older people care practice. Method: This is an exploratory and descriptive study of a qualitative nature, covering a sample of three interlocutors with experience in the formation and implementation of MCH. Data collection was carried out through a mixed questionnaire, with open questions being interpreted using the content analysis technique. Results: The benefits of MCH relate to the people cared for (e.g., increased acceptance of care), to formal caregivers/collaborators (e.g., reduced absenteeism), as well as to the organizational system (changing the culture of care). The challenges arise internally (e.g., appropriation of techniques, resistance to change) and externally (e.g., training of professionals, organization of care focused on the task). Conclusions: MCH is an approach centered on interaction with the person being cared for, with benefits that span the entire organizational context. Its implementation translates opportunities for the daily practice of care, encompassing the people cared for and the teams providing care, influencing the organizational context. MCH represents a change in the care paradigm; however, there are several challenges to its implementation in practice, which suggests that greater involvement of all care interlocutors is suggested, namely the formal leaders of institutions and agents of public policies.Objetivo: Identificar os benefícios e desafios da implementação da Metodologia de Cuidado Humanitude (MCH) na prática dos cuidados em Estrutura Residencial para Idosos. Método: Trata-se de um estudo exploratório e descritivo de natureza qualitativa abrangendo uma amostra de três interlocutores com experiência na formação e implementação da MCH. A recolha de dados foi realizada através de um questionário misto, sendo as questões abertas interpretadas através da técnica da análise de conteúdo. Resultados: Os benefícios da MCH reportam-se às pessoas cuidadas (e.g., aumento da aceitação dos cuidados), aos cuidadores formais/colaboradores (e.g., redução do absentismo), bem como ao sistema organizacional (mudança da cultura dos cuidados). Os desafios colocam-se a nível interno (e.g., apropriação das técnicas, resistência à mudança) e externo (e.g., formação dos profissionais, organização dos cuidados centrados na tarefa). Conclusões: A MCH é uma abordagem centrada na interação com a pessoa cuidada, com benefícios transversais a todo o contexto organizacional. A sua implementação traduz oportunidades para a prática diária do cuidado, abrangendo as pessoas cuidadas e as equipas prestadoras de cuidados, surtindo influência no contexto organizacional. A MCH representa uma mudança no paradigma do cuidado, surgindo, no entanto, vários desafios à sua implementação na prática, pelo que se sugere um maior envolvimento de todos os interlocutores do cuidado, nomeadamente dos líderes formais das instituições e dos agentes das políticas públicas.Departamento de Investigação & Desenvolvimento do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga2021-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200Portuguese Journal of Behavioral and Social Research; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): May; 14–24Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social; Vol. 7 N.º 1 (2021): Maio; 14–242183-4938reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/438https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/448https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/459Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Carolina Fonseca, Helena Luz, Rosa Melohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFonseca, CarolinaLuz, HelenaCândida Melo, Rosa2023-05-25T22:00:55Zoai:ojs.rpics.ismt.pt:article/200Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:39:47.319476Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
Metodologia de Cuidado Humanitude: Benefícios e desafios da sua implementação na prática
title Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
spellingShingle Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
Fonseca, Carolina
Care
Caregivers
Older adults
Humanitude
Qualitative study
Cuidados
Cuidadores
Humanitude
Pessoas idosas
Estudo qualitativo
title_short Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
title_full Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
title_fullStr Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
title_full_unstemmed Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
title_sort Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
author Fonseca, Carolina
author_facet Fonseca, Carolina
Luz, Helena
Cândida Melo, Rosa
author_role author
author2 Luz, Helena
Cândida Melo, Rosa
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fonseca, Carolina
Luz, Helena
Cândida Melo, Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Care
Caregivers
Older adults
Humanitude
Qualitative study
Cuidados
Cuidadores
Humanitude
Pessoas idosas
Estudo qualitativo
topic Care
Caregivers
Older adults
Humanitude
Qualitative study
Cuidados
Cuidadores
Humanitude
Pessoas idosas
Estudo qualitativo
description Objective: Identify the perception of professionals regarding the benefits and difficulties of implementing the Methodology of Care Humanitude (MCH) in Residential homes for older people care practice. Method: This is an exploratory and descriptive study of a qualitative nature, covering a sample of three interlocutors with experience in the formation and implementation of MCH. Data collection was carried out through a mixed questionnaire, with open questions being interpreted using the content analysis technique. Results: The benefits of MCH relate to the people cared for (e.g., increased acceptance of care), to formal caregivers/collaborators (e.g., reduced absenteeism), as well as to the organizational system (changing the culture of care). The challenges arise internally (e.g., appropriation of techniques, resistance to change) and externally (e.g., training of professionals, organization of care focused on the task). Conclusions: MCH is an approach centered on interaction with the person being cared for, with benefits that span the entire organizational context. Its implementation translates opportunities for the daily practice of care, encompassing the people cared for and the teams providing care, influencing the organizational context. MCH represents a change in the care paradigm; however, there are several challenges to its implementation in practice, which suggests that greater involvement of all care interlocutors is suggested, namely the formal leaders of institutions and agents of public policies.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-05-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200
https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200
url https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200
https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/438
https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/448
https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/459
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Carolina Fonseca, Helena Luz, Rosa Melo
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Carolina Fonseca, Helena Luz, Rosa Melo
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Investigação & Desenvolvimento do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Investigação & Desenvolvimento do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Behavioral and Social Research; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): May; 14–24
Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social; Vol. 7 N.º 1 (2021): Maio; 14–24
2183-4938
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130860938592256