Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200 |
Resumo: | Objective: Identify the perception of professionals regarding the benefits and difficulties of implementing the Methodology of Care Humanitude (MCH) in Residential homes for older people care practice. Method: This is an exploratory and descriptive study of a qualitative nature, covering a sample of three interlocutors with experience in the formation and implementation of MCH. Data collection was carried out through a mixed questionnaire, with open questions being interpreted using the content analysis technique. Results: The benefits of MCH relate to the people cared for (e.g., increased acceptance of care), to formal caregivers/collaborators (e.g., reduced absenteeism), as well as to the organizational system (changing the culture of care). The challenges arise internally (e.g., appropriation of techniques, resistance to change) and externally (e.g., training of professionals, organization of care focused on the task). Conclusions: MCH is an approach centered on interaction with the person being cared for, with benefits that span the entire organizational context. Its implementation translates opportunities for the daily practice of care, encompassing the people cared for and the teams providing care, influencing the organizational context. MCH represents a change in the care paradigm; however, there are several challenges to its implementation in practice, which suggests that greater involvement of all care interlocutors is suggested, namely the formal leaders of institutions and agents of public policies. |
id |
RCAP_faff2464b6784d69e59577e134bcfb02 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.rpics.ismt.pt:article/200 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practiceMetodologia de Cuidado Humanitude: Benefícios e desafios da sua implementação na práticaCareCaregiversOlder adultsHumanitudeQualitative studyCuidadosCuidadoresHumanitudePessoas idosasEstudo qualitativoObjective: Identify the perception of professionals regarding the benefits and difficulties of implementing the Methodology of Care Humanitude (MCH) in Residential homes for older people care practice. Method: This is an exploratory and descriptive study of a qualitative nature, covering a sample of three interlocutors with experience in the formation and implementation of MCH. Data collection was carried out through a mixed questionnaire, with open questions being interpreted using the content analysis technique. Results: The benefits of MCH relate to the people cared for (e.g., increased acceptance of care), to formal caregivers/collaborators (e.g., reduced absenteeism), as well as to the organizational system (changing the culture of care). The challenges arise internally (e.g., appropriation of techniques, resistance to change) and externally (e.g., training of professionals, organization of care focused on the task). Conclusions: MCH is an approach centered on interaction with the person being cared for, with benefits that span the entire organizational context. Its implementation translates opportunities for the daily practice of care, encompassing the people cared for and the teams providing care, influencing the organizational context. MCH represents a change in the care paradigm; however, there are several challenges to its implementation in practice, which suggests that greater involvement of all care interlocutors is suggested, namely the formal leaders of institutions and agents of public policies.Objetivo: Identificar os benefícios e desafios da implementação da Metodologia de Cuidado Humanitude (MCH) na prática dos cuidados em Estrutura Residencial para Idosos. Método: Trata-se de um estudo exploratório e descritivo de natureza qualitativa abrangendo uma amostra de três interlocutores com experiência na formação e implementação da MCH. A recolha de dados foi realizada através de um questionário misto, sendo as questões abertas interpretadas através da técnica da análise de conteúdo. Resultados: Os benefícios da MCH reportam-se às pessoas cuidadas (e.g., aumento da aceitação dos cuidados), aos cuidadores formais/colaboradores (e.g., redução do absentismo), bem como ao sistema organizacional (mudança da cultura dos cuidados). Os desafios colocam-se a nível interno (e.g., apropriação das técnicas, resistência à mudança) e externo (e.g., formação dos profissionais, organização dos cuidados centrados na tarefa). Conclusões: A MCH é uma abordagem centrada na interação com a pessoa cuidada, com benefícios transversais a todo o contexto organizacional. A sua implementação traduz oportunidades para a prática diária do cuidado, abrangendo as pessoas cuidadas e as equipas prestadoras de cuidados, surtindo influência no contexto organizacional. A MCH representa uma mudança no paradigma do cuidado, surgindo, no entanto, vários desafios à sua implementação na prática, pelo que se sugere um maior envolvimento de todos os interlocutores do cuidado, nomeadamente dos líderes formais das instituições e dos agentes das políticas públicas.Departamento de Investigação & Desenvolvimento do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga2021-05-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdftext/htmltext/xmlhttps://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200Portuguese Journal of Behavioral and Social Research; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): May; 14–24Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social; Vol. 7 N.º 1 (2021): Maio; 14–242183-4938reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/438https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/448https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/459Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Carolina Fonseca, Helena Luz, Rosa Melohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFonseca, CarolinaLuz, HelenaCândida Melo, Rosa2023-05-25T22:00:55Zoai:ojs.rpics.ismt.pt:article/200Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:39:47.319476Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice Metodologia de Cuidado Humanitude: Benefícios e desafios da sua implementação na prática |
title |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice |
spellingShingle |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice Fonseca, Carolina Care Caregivers Older adults Humanitude Qualitative study Cuidados Cuidadores Humanitude Pessoas idosas Estudo qualitativo |
title_short |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice |
title_full |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice |
title_fullStr |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice |
title_sort |
Methodology of Care Humanitude: Benefits and challenges of its implementation in practice |
author |
Fonseca, Carolina |
author_facet |
Fonseca, Carolina Luz, Helena Cândida Melo, Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Luz, Helena Cândida Melo, Rosa |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca, Carolina Luz, Helena Cândida Melo, Rosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Care Caregivers Older adults Humanitude Qualitative study Cuidados Cuidadores Humanitude Pessoas idosas Estudo qualitativo |
topic |
Care Caregivers Older adults Humanitude Qualitative study Cuidados Cuidadores Humanitude Pessoas idosas Estudo qualitativo |
description |
Objective: Identify the perception of professionals regarding the benefits and difficulties of implementing the Methodology of Care Humanitude (MCH) in Residential homes for older people care practice. Method: This is an exploratory and descriptive study of a qualitative nature, covering a sample of three interlocutors with experience in the formation and implementation of MCH. Data collection was carried out through a mixed questionnaire, with open questions being interpreted using the content analysis technique. Results: The benefits of MCH relate to the people cared for (e.g., increased acceptance of care), to formal caregivers/collaborators (e.g., reduced absenteeism), as well as to the organizational system (changing the culture of care). The challenges arise internally (e.g., appropriation of techniques, resistance to change) and externally (e.g., training of professionals, organization of care focused on the task). Conclusions: MCH is an approach centered on interaction with the person being cared for, with benefits that span the entire organizational context. Its implementation translates opportunities for the daily practice of care, encompassing the people cared for and the teams providing care, influencing the organizational context. MCH represents a change in the care paradigm; however, there are several challenges to its implementation in practice, which suggests that greater involvement of all care interlocutors is suggested, namely the formal leaders of institutions and agents of public policies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200 https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.31211/rpics.2021.7.1.200 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200 https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/438 https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/448 https://rpics.ismt.pt/index.php/ISMT/article/view/200/459 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Carolina Fonseca, Helena Luz, Rosa Melo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Carolina Fonseca, Helena Luz, Rosa Melo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/html text/xml |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Investigação & Desenvolvimento do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Investigação & Desenvolvimento do Instituto Superior Miguel Torga |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Portuguese Journal of Behavioral and Social Research; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): May; 14–24 Revista Portuguesa de Investigação Comportamental e Social; Vol. 7 N.º 1 (2021): Maio; 14–24 2183-4938 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799130860938592256 |