Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln8ano2021a17 |
Resumo: | This study investigates the interpretation of subject pronouns in L2 EP by Italian native speakers, to examine the following questions: In overt subject resolution, do L1 Italian - L2 European Portuguese learners behave like L1 EP speakers regarding antecedent animacy (a property at the syntax-semantics interface) at L2 developmental stages and at the near-native level?; When the antecedent in object position is animate, do L1 Italian - L2 EP learners exhibit permanent optionality in the interpretation of overt subject pronouns but not of null subjects, as claimed by Sorace (2016), a.o.? Participants were 15 adult EP native speakers, 10 intermediate, 10 advanced and 10 near-native Italian adult learners of L2 EP. They were administered two multiple-choice tasks (speeded and untimed) with a 2x2 design crossing the following variables: animacy of the matrix object (animate vs. inanimate) and type of embedded pronominal subject (overt vs. null). Results indicate that L2 learners show problems only in the areas where the L1 and the L2 differ (Madeira, Fiéis & Teixeira, this volume), namely: the resolution of overt subjects in the presence of [-animate] object antecedent and the resolution of null subjects. Learners’ performance in these areas remains unstable even at the near-native level. These findings challenge the ideas that internal interfaces (syntax/semantics) are not persistently problematic and that null subjects are unproblematic in L2 anaphora resolution (cf. Sorace, 2011, 2016). They moreover point to the importance of L1 influence in L2 anaphora resolution, a factor generally played down in previous studies (e.g., Sorace, 2016). |
id |
RCAP_fbed839b6e2ad9f3316e2d49efd038a0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs3.ojs.apl.pt:article/124 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository_id_str |
7160 |
spelling |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedentResolução anafórica em português europeu L2: efeitos de animacidade e a posição do antecedenteaquisição de L2resolução anafóricaanimacidadeposição do antecedenteportuguês europeuL2 acquisitionanaphora resolutionanimacyposition of the antecedentEuropean PortugueseThis study investigates the interpretation of subject pronouns in L2 EP by Italian native speakers, to examine the following questions: In overt subject resolution, do L1 Italian - L2 European Portuguese learners behave like L1 EP speakers regarding antecedent animacy (a property at the syntax-semantics interface) at L2 developmental stages and at the near-native level?; When the antecedent in object position is animate, do L1 Italian - L2 EP learners exhibit permanent optionality in the interpretation of overt subject pronouns but not of null subjects, as claimed by Sorace (2016), a.o.? Participants were 15 adult EP native speakers, 10 intermediate, 10 advanced and 10 near-native Italian adult learners of L2 EP. They were administered two multiple-choice tasks (speeded and untimed) with a 2x2 design crossing the following variables: animacy of the matrix object (animate vs. inanimate) and type of embedded pronominal subject (overt vs. null). Results indicate that L2 learners show problems only in the areas where the L1 and the L2 differ (Madeira, Fiéis & Teixeira, this volume), namely: the resolution of overt subjects in the presence of [-animate] object antecedent and the resolution of null subjects. Learners’ performance in these areas remains unstable even at the near-native level. These findings challenge the ideas that internal interfaces (syntax/semantics) are not persistently problematic and that null subjects are unproblematic in L2 anaphora resolution (cf. Sorace, 2011, 2016). They moreover point to the importance of L1 influence in L2 anaphora resolution, a factor generally played down in previous studies (e.g., Sorace, 2016).Associação Portuguesa de Linguística2021-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln8ano2021a17https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln8ano2021a17Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; No. 8 (2021): Journal of the Portuguese Linguistics Association; 260-275Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; N.º 8 (2021): Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; 260-2752183-9077reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPporhttps://ojs.apl.pt/index.php/rapl/article/view/124https://ojs.apl.pt/index.php/rapl/article/view/124/121Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Joana Teixeira, Alexandra Fiéis, Ana Madeirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTeixeira, JoanaFiéis, AlexandraMadeira, Ana2023-12-02T10:17:50Zoai:ojs3.ojs.apl.pt:article/124Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:36:01.866049Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent Resolução anafórica em português europeu L2: efeitos de animacidade e a posição do antecedente |
title |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent |
spellingShingle |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent Teixeira, Joana aquisição de L2 resolução anafórica animacidade posição do antecedente português europeu L2 acquisition anaphora resolution animacy position of the antecedent European Portuguese |
title_short |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent |
title_full |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent |
title_fullStr |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent |
title_sort |
Anaphora resolution in L2 European Portuguese: animacy effects and the position of the antecedent |
author |
Teixeira, Joana |
author_facet |
Teixeira, Joana Fiéis, Alexandra Madeira, Ana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fiéis, Alexandra Madeira, Ana |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Teixeira, Joana Fiéis, Alexandra Madeira, Ana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
aquisição de L2 resolução anafórica animacidade posição do antecedente português europeu L2 acquisition anaphora resolution animacy position of the antecedent European Portuguese |
topic |
aquisição de L2 resolução anafórica animacidade posição do antecedente português europeu L2 acquisition anaphora resolution animacy position of the antecedent European Portuguese |
description |
This study investigates the interpretation of subject pronouns in L2 EP by Italian native speakers, to examine the following questions: In overt subject resolution, do L1 Italian - L2 European Portuguese learners behave like L1 EP speakers regarding antecedent animacy (a property at the syntax-semantics interface) at L2 developmental stages and at the near-native level?; When the antecedent in object position is animate, do L1 Italian - L2 EP learners exhibit permanent optionality in the interpretation of overt subject pronouns but not of null subjects, as claimed by Sorace (2016), a.o.? Participants were 15 adult EP native speakers, 10 intermediate, 10 advanced and 10 near-native Italian adult learners of L2 EP. They were administered two multiple-choice tasks (speeded and untimed) with a 2x2 design crossing the following variables: animacy of the matrix object (animate vs. inanimate) and type of embedded pronominal subject (overt vs. null). Results indicate that L2 learners show problems only in the areas where the L1 and the L2 differ (Madeira, Fiéis & Teixeira, this volume), namely: the resolution of overt subjects in the presence of [-animate] object antecedent and the resolution of null subjects. Learners’ performance in these areas remains unstable even at the near-native level. These findings challenge the ideas that internal interfaces (syntax/semantics) are not persistently problematic and that null subjects are unproblematic in L2 anaphora resolution (cf. Sorace, 2011, 2016). They moreover point to the importance of L1 influence in L2 anaphora resolution, a factor generally played down in previous studies (e.g., Sorace, 2016). |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-16 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln8ano2021a17 https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln8ano2021a17 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln8ano2021a17 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.apl.pt/index.php/rapl/article/view/124 https://ojs.apl.pt/index.php/rapl/article/view/124/121 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Joana Teixeira, Alexandra Fiéis, Ana Madeira info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Joana Teixeira, Alexandra Fiéis, Ana Madeira |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Linguística |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Associação Portuguesa de Linguística |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; No. 8 (2021): Journal of the Portuguese Linguistics Association; 260-275 Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; N.º 8 (2021): Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; 260-275 2183-9077 reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
collection |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1799133623304060928 |