Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Jaime A.
Data de Publicação: 2006
Outros Autores: Bugalho, Miguel N., Cortez, Paulo, Iason, Glenn R.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.017
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10316/5351
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.017
Resumo: Antler rubbing is a form of behaviour by which deer may damage and ultimately induce mortality of trees. Understanding factors affecting selection of trees for rubbing may contribute to mitigation of negative effects of such behaviour in plantations or woodlands. We analysed characteristics of trees rubbed by red and roe deer along transects established in plantations of Pinus pinaster (Aiton), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco, Betula alba L. and Quercus robur L. in Northeast Portugal. Transects were walked during five sampling periods covering mating seasons of red and roe deer. Red deer preferentially rubbed trees adjacent to the edge of plantations and large clearings whilst roe deer selected those inside plantations within small clearings. There was seasonal segregation in the number of trees rubbed by each deer species with red deer rubbing trees mainly between September and February and roe deer mainly between December and June. Both red and roe deer selected trees with smaller diameter than those of available trees although trees selected by red deer had larger diameters than those selected by roe deer. Roe, but not red deer, tended to avoid trees protected by shrubs. Overall, the selection of trees for rubbing was site-dependent suggesting that generalizations across sites should be made with caution. Mitigating measures, such as deer control, tree protection or provision of alternative rubbing posts should target stands of particular tree species, location of trees in relation to stand clearings and tree size classes.
id RCAP_fbfa81f7889e3b19800b14954c0a7153
oai_identifier_str oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/5351
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantationsCapreolus capreolusCervus elaphusFrayingPortugalRubbingAntler rubbing is a form of behaviour by which deer may damage and ultimately induce mortality of trees. Understanding factors affecting selection of trees for rubbing may contribute to mitigation of negative effects of such behaviour in plantations or woodlands. We analysed characteristics of trees rubbed by red and roe deer along transects established in plantations of Pinus pinaster (Aiton), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco, Betula alba L. and Quercus robur L. in Northeast Portugal. Transects were walked during five sampling periods covering mating seasons of red and roe deer. Red deer preferentially rubbed trees adjacent to the edge of plantations and large clearings whilst roe deer selected those inside plantations within small clearings. There was seasonal segregation in the number of trees rubbed by each deer species with red deer rubbing trees mainly between September and February and roe deer mainly between December and June. Both red and roe deer selected trees with smaller diameter than those of available trees although trees selected by red deer had larger diameters than those selected by roe deer. Roe, but not red deer, tended to avoid trees protected by shrubs. Overall, the selection of trees for rubbing was site-dependent suggesting that generalizations across sites should be made with caution. Mitigating measures, such as deer control, tree protection or provision of alternative rubbing posts should target stands of particular tree species, location of trees in relation to stand clearings and tree size classes.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6T6X-4HGM78R-2/1/29fe58190c40581f0716e977b7847d382006info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleaplication/PDFhttp://hdl.handle.net/10316/5351http://hdl.handle.net/10316/5351https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.017engForest Ecology and Management. 222:1-3 (2006) 39-45Ramos, Jaime A.Bugalho, Miguel N.Cortez, PauloIason, Glenn R.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2020-11-06T16:49:05Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/5351Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T20:55:27.376636Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
title Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
spellingShingle Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
Ramos, Jaime A.
Capreolus capreolus
Cervus elaphus
Fraying
Portugal
Rubbing
Ramos, Jaime A.
Capreolus capreolus
Cervus elaphus
Fraying
Portugal
Rubbing
title_short Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
title_full Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
title_fullStr Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
title_full_unstemmed Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
title_sort Selection of trees for rubbing by red and roe deer in forest plantations
author Ramos, Jaime A.
author_facet Ramos, Jaime A.
Ramos, Jaime A.
Bugalho, Miguel N.
Cortez, Paulo
Iason, Glenn R.
Bugalho, Miguel N.
Cortez, Paulo
Iason, Glenn R.
author_role author
author2 Bugalho, Miguel N.
Cortez, Paulo
Iason, Glenn R.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Jaime A.
Bugalho, Miguel N.
Cortez, Paulo
Iason, Glenn R.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Capreolus capreolus
Cervus elaphus
Fraying
Portugal
Rubbing
topic Capreolus capreolus
Cervus elaphus
Fraying
Portugal
Rubbing
description Antler rubbing is a form of behaviour by which deer may damage and ultimately induce mortality of trees. Understanding factors affecting selection of trees for rubbing may contribute to mitigation of negative effects of such behaviour in plantations or woodlands. We analysed characteristics of trees rubbed by red and roe deer along transects established in plantations of Pinus pinaster (Aiton), Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirbel) Franco, Betula alba L. and Quercus robur L. in Northeast Portugal. Transects were walked during five sampling periods covering mating seasons of red and roe deer. Red deer preferentially rubbed trees adjacent to the edge of plantations and large clearings whilst roe deer selected those inside plantations within small clearings. There was seasonal segregation in the number of trees rubbed by each deer species with red deer rubbing trees mainly between September and February and roe deer mainly between December and June. Both red and roe deer selected trees with smaller diameter than those of available trees although trees selected by red deer had larger diameters than those selected by roe deer. Roe, but not red deer, tended to avoid trees protected by shrubs. Overall, the selection of trees for rubbing was site-dependent suggesting that generalizations across sites should be made with caution. Mitigating measures, such as deer control, tree protection or provision of alternative rubbing posts should target stands of particular tree species, location of trees in relation to stand clearings and tree size classes.
publishDate 2006
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2006
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10316/5351
http://hdl.handle.net/10316/5351
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.017
url http://hdl.handle.net/10316/5351
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Forest Ecology and Management. 222:1-3 (2006) 39-45
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv aplication/PDF
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1822183370033987584
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.017