Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Fernando Max
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Brenner, Diego, Rodrigues, Gustavo de Mello, Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho, Bertoncello, Dernival
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
DOI: 10.6063/motricidade.18097
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.18097
Resumo: The objective was to evaluate whether the 10-RM test can be applied to both trained and untrained people in elbow flexor strengthening exercises. The sample consisted of 23 men aged between 18 and 30 years old, of which 11 were untrained (NT - control group), and 12 were resistance-trained (TR - trained group). The experiment started with a specific warm-up session followed by collections of myoelectric signals from the brachial biceps muscle, bilaterally, in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contractions (MVIC), the 10-RM test for elbow flexion and the new MVIC, followed by deceleration. By analyzing each contraction separately contraction, a significant increase in RMS (Root Mean Square) was found by a normalized MVIC with regard to 1st contraction, starting from the 3rd repetition for the TR group. When comparing each contraction of the 10-RM test with the previous one, a significant reduction of MF (Median Frequency) between the 5th and the 6th repetition of the TR group was observed. It was concluded that the Test of 10 Maximum Repetitions should be reconsidered when performed for purposes of comparison between sides of the body. Also, when considering the probable fatigue caused by the successive movements, a better application of tests with 6 to 8 repetitions was suggested.
id RCAP_fc61913bc2371531c12c263f557ce526
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/18097
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?O teste de 10-RM é ideal para avaliação de indivíduos treinados e não treinados?Original ArticleThe objective was to evaluate whether the 10-RM test can be applied to both trained and untrained people in elbow flexor strengthening exercises. The sample consisted of 23 men aged between 18 and 30 years old, of which 11 were untrained (NT - control group), and 12 were resistance-trained (TR - trained group). The experiment started with a specific warm-up session followed by collections of myoelectric signals from the brachial biceps muscle, bilaterally, in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contractions (MVIC), the 10-RM test for elbow flexion and the new MVIC, followed by deceleration. By analyzing each contraction separately contraction, a significant increase in RMS (Root Mean Square) was found by a normalized MVIC with regard to 1st contraction, starting from the 3rd repetition for the TR group. When comparing each contraction of the 10-RM test with the previous one, a significant reduction of MF (Median Frequency) between the 5th and the 6th repetition of the TR group was observed. It was concluded that the Test of 10 Maximum Repetitions should be reconsidered when performed for purposes of comparison between sides of the body. Also, when considering the probable fatigue caused by the successive movements, a better application of tests with 6 to 8 repetitions was suggested.O objetivo do estudo foi avaliar se o teste de 10-RM pode ser aplicado a pessoas treinadas e não treinadas através do exercício de força do cotovelo. A amostra constituiu de 23 homens idade entre 18 e 30 anos, sendo 11 não treinados (UT-grupo controle) e 12 treinados com resistência (TR – grupo treinado). O experimento foi iniciado com aquecimento específico seguido por coleta de sinal mioelétrico do músculo bíceps braquial bilateralmente na Contração Isométrica Voluntária Máxima (MVIC), teste de 10-RM para flexão de cotovelo e nova MVIC, seguido de desaceleração. Ao analisar contração por contração, foi encontrado um aumento significativo no RMS (Root Mean Square) normalizado pela CIVM em relação a 1ª contração a partir da 3ª repetição para o grupo TR. Quando comparado cada contração do teste de 10-RM com o predecessor, observou-se redução significativa da FM (Frequencia Média) entre a 5ª e a 6ª repetição do TR. Conclui-se que o Teste de 10 Repetições Máximas deve ser reconsiderado quando realizado para fins de comparação entre os dois lados do corpo. Além disso, ao considerar a provável fadiga causada pelos movimentos sucessivos, sugere-se melhor aplicação de testes com 6 a 8 repetições.Edições Sílabas Didáticas2020-09-30info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.18097eng2182-29721646-107XLima, Fernando MaxBrenner, DiegoRodrigues, Gustavo de MelloFernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues MartinhoBertoncello, Dernivalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T15:06:26Zoai:ojs.revistas.rcaap.pt:article/18097Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openairemluisa.alvim@gmail.comopendoar:71602024-05-06T15:06:26Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
O teste de 10-RM é ideal para avaliação de indivíduos treinados e não treinados?
title Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
spellingShingle Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
Lima, Fernando Max
Original Article
Lima, Fernando Max
Original Article
title_short Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
title_full Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
title_fullStr Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
title_full_unstemmed Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
title_sort Is the 10-RM test ideal for evaluating trained and untrained individuals?
author Lima, Fernando Max
author_facet Lima, Fernando Max
Lima, Fernando Max
Brenner, Diego
Rodrigues, Gustavo de Mello
Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho
Bertoncello, Dernival
Brenner, Diego
Rodrigues, Gustavo de Mello
Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho
Bertoncello, Dernival
author_role author
author2 Brenner, Diego
Rodrigues, Gustavo de Mello
Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho
Bertoncello, Dernival
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Fernando Max
Brenner, Diego
Rodrigues, Gustavo de Mello
Fernandes, Luciane Fernanda Rodrigues Martinho
Bertoncello, Dernival
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Original Article
topic Original Article
description The objective was to evaluate whether the 10-RM test can be applied to both trained and untrained people in elbow flexor strengthening exercises. The sample consisted of 23 men aged between 18 and 30 years old, of which 11 were untrained (NT - control group), and 12 were resistance-trained (TR - trained group). The experiment started with a specific warm-up session followed by collections of myoelectric signals from the brachial biceps muscle, bilaterally, in Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contractions (MVIC), the 10-RM test for elbow flexion and the new MVIC, followed by deceleration. By analyzing each contraction separately contraction, a significant increase in RMS (Root Mean Square) was found by a normalized MVIC with regard to 1st contraction, starting from the 3rd repetition for the TR group. When comparing each contraction of the 10-RM test with the previous one, a significant reduction of MF (Median Frequency) between the 5th and the 6th repetition of the TR group was observed. It was concluded that the Test of 10 Maximum Repetitions should be reconsidered when performed for purposes of comparison between sides of the body. Also, when considering the probable fatigue caused by the successive movements, a better application of tests with 6 to 8 repetitions was suggested.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-30
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.18097
url https://doi.org/10.6063/motricidade.18097
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2182-2972
1646-107X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edições Sílabas Didáticas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Edições Sílabas Didáticas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv mluisa.alvim@gmail.com
_version_ 1822183179890458624
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.6063/motricidade.18097