Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Madeira, Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Raimundo, F., Pires, A.L., Fonseca, S., Martins, A.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/1458
Resumo: The effects of several soil management systems on litterfall production (leaves, burs, chestnuts and inflorescences) and leaf nutrient concentration were studied in a 50 year-old chestnut grove, located in North-east Portugal. The experimental trial was installed in the beginning of 1996 and it was monitored for eight years. The treatments were: chisel plow (average depth 15 cm), which corresponds to the traditional tillage (MT); disc harrowing tillage, up to 7 cm depth (GD); rainfed seeded pasture, with leguminous and grasses species (PS); and no-tillage with spontaneous herbaceous vegetation (NM). Results, between 1999 and 2004, showed that the average production of litterfall (leaves, burs, chestnuts and inflorescences), was greatest in NM treatment (755 g m-2), followed by the PS (729 g m-2), GD (708 g m-2) and MT (627 g m-2) treatment, although the differences were not significant. During that period, the burs (36.7%) made the greatest contribution to total litterfall, followed by the leaves (32.5%), chestnuts (24.7%) and inflorescences (6.1%). The chestnut production was significantly lower in the MT (133 g m-2) treatment than in the NM (193 g m-2) and PS (191 g m-2). The N, P and Mg content in leaves were significantly lower in MT treatment than in the others; the K content was significantly lower in MT and PS treatments than in GD; the Ca concentration was significantly lower in MT treatment than in GD and PS. Management practices alternatives to the traditional soil tillage revealed to be more appropriated to enhance productivity of chestnut groves and to reduce production costs.
id RCAP_fddb1ae2f01bd94ae5ead845484ada42
oai_identifier_str oai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/1458
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do soloChestnut and litterfall production and leaf nutrient concentration in chestnut groves submitted to different soil tillage systemslitterfallcastanea sativachestnutsoil tillageThe effects of several soil management systems on litterfall production (leaves, burs, chestnuts and inflorescences) and leaf nutrient concentration were studied in a 50 year-old chestnut grove, located in North-east Portugal. The experimental trial was installed in the beginning of 1996 and it was monitored for eight years. The treatments were: chisel plow (average depth 15 cm), which corresponds to the traditional tillage (MT); disc harrowing tillage, up to 7 cm depth (GD); rainfed seeded pasture, with leguminous and grasses species (PS); and no-tillage with spontaneous herbaceous vegetation (NM). Results, between 1999 and 2004, showed that the average production of litterfall (leaves, burs, chestnuts and inflorescences), was greatest in NM treatment (755 g m-2), followed by the PS (729 g m-2), GD (708 g m-2) and MT (627 g m-2) treatment, although the differences were not significant. During that period, the burs (36.7%) made the greatest contribution to total litterfall, followed by the leaves (32.5%), chestnuts (24.7%) and inflorescences (6.1%). The chestnut production was significantly lower in the MT (133 g m-2) treatment than in the NM (193 g m-2) and PS (191 g m-2). The N, P and Mg content in leaves were significantly lower in MT treatment than in the others; the K content was significantly lower in MT and PS treatments than in GD; the Ca concentration was significantly lower in MT treatment than in GD and PS. Management practices alternatives to the traditional soil tillage revealed to be more appropriated to enhance productivity of chestnut groves and to reduce production costs.Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de PortugalRepositório da Universidade de LisboaMadeira, ManuelRaimundo, F.Pires, A.L.Fonseca, S.Martins, A.2009-11-11T15:03:32Z2009-012009-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/1458por"Revista de Ciências Agrárias". ISSN 0871-018X. 32:1 (2009) 245-2570871-018Xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAP2023-03-06T14:32:42Zoai:www.repository.utl.pt:10400.5/1458Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-19T16:49:35.319343Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo
Chestnut and litterfall production and leaf nutrient concentration in chestnut groves submitted to different soil tillage systems
title Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo
spellingShingle Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo
Madeira, Manuel
litterfall
castanea sativa
chestnut
soil tillage
title_short Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo
title_full Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo
title_fullStr Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo
title_full_unstemmed Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo
title_sort Produção de castanha e de folhada e concentração de nutrientes nas folhas de soutos submetidos a diferentes sistemas de mobilização do solo
author Madeira, Manuel
author_facet Madeira, Manuel
Raimundo, F.
Pires, A.L.
Fonseca, S.
Martins, A.
author_role author
author2 Raimundo, F.
Pires, A.L.
Fonseca, S.
Martins, A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Universidade de Lisboa
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Madeira, Manuel
Raimundo, F.
Pires, A.L.
Fonseca, S.
Martins, A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv litterfall
castanea sativa
chestnut
soil tillage
topic litterfall
castanea sativa
chestnut
soil tillage
description The effects of several soil management systems on litterfall production (leaves, burs, chestnuts and inflorescences) and leaf nutrient concentration were studied in a 50 year-old chestnut grove, located in North-east Portugal. The experimental trial was installed in the beginning of 1996 and it was monitored for eight years. The treatments were: chisel plow (average depth 15 cm), which corresponds to the traditional tillage (MT); disc harrowing tillage, up to 7 cm depth (GD); rainfed seeded pasture, with leguminous and grasses species (PS); and no-tillage with spontaneous herbaceous vegetation (NM). Results, between 1999 and 2004, showed that the average production of litterfall (leaves, burs, chestnuts and inflorescences), was greatest in NM treatment (755 g m-2), followed by the PS (729 g m-2), GD (708 g m-2) and MT (627 g m-2) treatment, although the differences were not significant. During that period, the burs (36.7%) made the greatest contribution to total litterfall, followed by the leaves (32.5%), chestnuts (24.7%) and inflorescences (6.1%). The chestnut production was significantly lower in the MT (133 g m-2) treatment than in the NM (193 g m-2) and PS (191 g m-2). The N, P and Mg content in leaves were significantly lower in MT treatment than in the others; the K content was significantly lower in MT and PS treatments than in GD; the Ca concentration was significantly lower in MT treatment than in GD and PS. Management practices alternatives to the traditional soil tillage revealed to be more appropriated to enhance productivity of chestnut groves and to reduce production costs.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-11-11T15:03:32Z
2009-01
2009-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/1458
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/1458
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv "Revista de Ciências Agrárias". ISSN 0871-018X. 32:1 (2009) 245-257
0871-018X
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade de Ciências Agrárias de Portugal
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799130969650757632