Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rocha,Joana Francisca
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Fructuoso,Mónica, Sousa,Pedro Filipe, Ferreira,Joana, Abreu,Rui Miguel, Eusébio,Catarina, Morgado,Teresa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
Texto Completo: http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692017000300003
Resumo: Introduction: The use of iodinated contrast angiography in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to arteriovenous access (AVA) problems is limited by nephrotoxicity and allergic reactions. The use of alternatives such as CO2 or ultrasound guidance has increased over the last few decades. Purpose: To evaluate the results and complications of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of AVA performed at our centre without the use of iodinated contrast. Methods: We evaluated retrospectively all patients submitted to endovascular diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures using CO2 or ultrasound at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2016. Results: 30 procedures were performed in 22 patients: 15 ultrasound-guided angioplasties and 15 CO2 procedures (14 angioplasties and 1 diagnostic angiography). The mean age of patients was 74±10 years (41--94). Most procedures (90%) were performed on proximal arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and 3 were performed on distal AVFs. Iodinated contrast was not used because of its potential nephrotoxicity. Ultrasound-guided angioplasty was performed to treat outflow stenoses in the majority (73%) of the cases. The result was favourable in all procedures. One was complicated by venous rupture. Regarding angioplasties with CO2, outflow stenoses were the most treated (38%). The result was favourable in all procedures. Diagnostic angiography with CO2 was performed in a patient with signs of limb venous hypertension and was inconclusive. There were two complications in CO2 procedures: formation of pseudoaneurysm at the place of insertion of the introducer (n=1) and transient headache and nausea (n=1). Three of the patients who underwent angioplasty with CO2 and one patient who underwent ultrasound-guided procedure were submitted to balloon-assisted maturation. Conclusion: In our experience, the use of alternative methods with no iodinated contrast (CO2/ultrasound) in the evaluation and treatment of vascular access problems in patients with renal dysfunction is effective and safe
id RCAP_feeca3867c9e9d4f5e994cb872a40869
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0872-01692017000300003
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository_id_str 7160
spelling Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experienceAngiographycarbon dioxidehaemodialysis vascular accessultrasound guidedIntroduction: The use of iodinated contrast angiography in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to arteriovenous access (AVA) problems is limited by nephrotoxicity and allergic reactions. The use of alternatives such as CO2 or ultrasound guidance has increased over the last few decades. Purpose: To evaluate the results and complications of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of AVA performed at our centre without the use of iodinated contrast. Methods: We evaluated retrospectively all patients submitted to endovascular diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures using CO2 or ultrasound at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2016. Results: 30 procedures were performed in 22 patients: 15 ultrasound-guided angioplasties and 15 CO2 procedures (14 angioplasties and 1 diagnostic angiography). The mean age of patients was 74±10 years (41--94). Most procedures (90%) were performed on proximal arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and 3 were performed on distal AVFs. Iodinated contrast was not used because of its potential nephrotoxicity. Ultrasound-guided angioplasty was performed to treat outflow stenoses in the majority (73%) of the cases. The result was favourable in all procedures. One was complicated by venous rupture. Regarding angioplasties with CO2, outflow stenoses were the most treated (38%). The result was favourable in all procedures. Diagnostic angiography with CO2 was performed in a patient with signs of limb venous hypertension and was inconclusive. There were two complications in CO2 procedures: formation of pseudoaneurysm at the place of insertion of the introducer (n=1) and transient headache and nausea (n=1). Three of the patients who underwent angioplasty with CO2 and one patient who underwent ultrasound-guided procedure were submitted to balloon-assisted maturation. Conclusion: In our experience, the use of alternative methods with no iodinated contrast (CO2/ultrasound) in the evaluation and treatment of vascular access problems in patients with renal dysfunction is effective and safeSociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia2017-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692017000300003Portuguese Journal of Nephrology & Hypertension v.31 n.3 2017reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãoinstacron:RCAAPenghttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692017000300003Rocha,Joana FranciscaFructuoso,MónicaSousa,Pedro FilipeFerreira,JoanaAbreu,Rui MiguelEusébio,CatarinaMorgado,Teresainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-02-06T17:04:55Zoai:scielo:S0872-01692017000300003Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireopendoar:71602024-03-20T02:18:58.707649Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informaçãofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience
title Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience
spellingShingle Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience
Rocha,Joana Francisca
Angiography
carbon dioxide
haemodialysis vascular access
ultrasound guided
title_short Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience
title_full Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience
title_fullStr Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience
title_full_unstemmed Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience
title_sort Diagnosis and treatment of haemodialysis vascular access problems without iodinated contrast: a single-centre experience
author Rocha,Joana Francisca
author_facet Rocha,Joana Francisca
Fructuoso,Mónica
Sousa,Pedro Filipe
Ferreira,Joana
Abreu,Rui Miguel
Eusébio,Catarina
Morgado,Teresa
author_role author
author2 Fructuoso,Mónica
Sousa,Pedro Filipe
Ferreira,Joana
Abreu,Rui Miguel
Eusébio,Catarina
Morgado,Teresa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rocha,Joana Francisca
Fructuoso,Mónica
Sousa,Pedro Filipe
Ferreira,Joana
Abreu,Rui Miguel
Eusébio,Catarina
Morgado,Teresa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Angiography
carbon dioxide
haemodialysis vascular access
ultrasound guided
topic Angiography
carbon dioxide
haemodialysis vascular access
ultrasound guided
description Introduction: The use of iodinated contrast angiography in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to arteriovenous access (AVA) problems is limited by nephrotoxicity and allergic reactions. The use of alternatives such as CO2 or ultrasound guidance has increased over the last few decades. Purpose: To evaluate the results and complications of the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures of AVA performed at our centre without the use of iodinated contrast. Methods: We evaluated retrospectively all patients submitted to endovascular diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedures using CO2 or ultrasound at our hospital between January 2013 and December 2016. Results: 30 procedures were performed in 22 patients: 15 ultrasound-guided angioplasties and 15 CO2 procedures (14 angioplasties and 1 diagnostic angiography). The mean age of patients was 74±10 years (41--94). Most procedures (90%) were performed on proximal arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) and 3 were performed on distal AVFs. Iodinated contrast was not used because of its potential nephrotoxicity. Ultrasound-guided angioplasty was performed to treat outflow stenoses in the majority (73%) of the cases. The result was favourable in all procedures. One was complicated by venous rupture. Regarding angioplasties with CO2, outflow stenoses were the most treated (38%). The result was favourable in all procedures. Diagnostic angiography with CO2 was performed in a patient with signs of limb venous hypertension and was inconclusive. There were two complications in CO2 procedures: formation of pseudoaneurysm at the place of insertion of the introducer (n=1) and transient headache and nausea (n=1). Three of the patients who underwent angioplasty with CO2 and one patient who underwent ultrasound-guided procedure were submitted to balloon-assisted maturation. Conclusion: In our experience, the use of alternative methods with no iodinated contrast (CO2/ultrasound) in the evaluation and treatment of vascular access problems in patients with renal dysfunction is effective and safe
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692017000300003
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692017000300003
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0872-01692017000300003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Nefrologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Nephrology & Hypertension v.31 n.3 2017
reponame:Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
instname:Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
collection Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Científico de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (Repositórios Cientìficos) - Agência para a Sociedade do Conhecimento (UMIC) - FCT - Sociedade da Informação
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1799137279680184320